3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 382–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 19:09
383
-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:17
387
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:45
387
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
134.0%
avg views ÷ 383 subscribers
Avg views / post
513
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.929%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
16 (21 May 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
2,567
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
96 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
41
42.7%
❤
40
41.7%
👍
6
6.25%
😁
5
5.21%
❤🔥
2
2.08%
💯
1
1.04%
🥰
1
1.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alp_publishing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Diyoraga g‘alabada kim yordam bergan? Tahlil
Xo‘sh, u qanday muhim qarashlarni ilgari surganki, biz hatto Diyora Keldiyorovaga ham ta’sir ko‘rsatgan deya olamiz?
Batafsil: https://oyina.uz/uz/article/4902
Rasmiy sahifalarimiz👇
Telegram | Instagram | X | YouTube
Krishnamurti yordam bergan desam, ishonmaysizlar. Lekin shunaqa.
Va'da qilgan maqolam chiqdi.
"Bilganingdan ozodlik" kitobi yaqin orada qo'lingizda bo'ladi.
"Taym mashin: 1984" kitobi Madrid ko'chalarida
SOTUVDA
Kitob: Taym mashin: 1984/ roman
Muqova: qattiq
Narx: 60.000
📞 Murojaat uchun: @alpsavdo
+998507607434
📍 Manzil: Toshkent shahri, Muqimiy, 178 (Mo'ljal: Sporttovar)
Charos Bobomurodova:
"Одам кўкка эмас, балки ер курраси одамга сажда қилган даврга доя бўлган эди Тошкент."
Менинг Совет даври Тошкенти билан илмий, умумий билимларим кам, балки мустақиллик болаларининг кўпида шундайдир. Лекин дадам тарафидан кўп эшитганман. Дадам ўша пайтдаги Политехника университетида ўқиган, шу давр руҳида Тошкентни озми-кўпми танитган. Кейин кучли қизиқиш орқасидан ўзим Тошкентда ўқидим. Ўрта О…
Shuningdek, Diyora Keldiyorovaning sport falsafasi va muvaffaqiyati ham o'zi bilib bilmagan holda Krishnamurti falsafasiga borib taqaladi.
Aytgancha, kitob nomi ham o'zgardi:
BILGANINGDAN OZODLIK
Bryus Lining Jit Kun Do (jang san’ati tizimi) si uchun Krishnamurti ta’limoti poydevor vazifasini o'tab berdi.
Robert Kolet,jang san’ati bo'yicha mutaxassis va tadqiqotchi
Bizni Krish shunaqa 20 asrdagi har qanday yo'nalishga ta'sir ko'rsatib ketavergan. Devid Bom - kvant fizikasi nazariyotchisi aynan Jidduning kuzatuvchi va kuzatuv obyekti (kuzatilmish) bir narsa degan fikri tufayli kvant fizikasi bo'yicha o'z ta…
Ana, nima uchun Krishnamurti kitobini "Bilganingdan xalos bo'lib" deb nomladik:
Ўлим янгиланиш, ўзгаришдир, бунда тафаккур умуман ишламайди, чунки фикр эскиликка оид. Ўлим бор жойда бутунлай янги нарса вужудга келади. Сизга маълум, билган нарсаларингиздан халос бўлиш ўлимдир, ўшандагина чинакам ҳаёт кечира бошлайсиз.
Krishnamurti
Sizningcha, "Bilganingdan xalos bo'l" yaxshimi yoki ...Bo'lib?
Ps.: muqova taxmini…
Asiaterra nashri O'zbekistonda chop etilgan yangi kitob haqida xabar berdi:
В Узбекистане опубликован первый роман-антиутопия
https://m.asiaterra.info/
Издательство АЛП в Ташкенте выпустило отдельной книгой роман известного художника и журналиста Шухрата Бабажанова «Тайм машин 1984». Произведение представлено как первый антиутопический роман в Узбекистане.
В романе рассказывается о том, как в 1984 году аспирантка И…
Prezident "Taym-mashin: 1984" asarini e'tirof etdimi?
Ko‘p hollarda O‘zbekiston Prezidenti bilan ko‘p masalalarda bir xil fikrda ekanimni sezaman. Maktab davrida paxtaga chiqishdan va paxta terishdan nafratlanardim. Paxta sabab majburlangan shaharning go‘yo harbiy holat joriy etilgandek ko‘rinishini dahshat deb bilardim. Kuni kecha ziyolilar va ijodkorlar bilan uchrashuvda Shavkat Mirziyoyev maktabda o‘qish o‘rniga…
https://youtu.be/5erBzZm-_WE
Videoda Alpning oxirgi oylarda chiqqan 4 kitobiga ham sharh berib o'tilgan.
Bular:
"Cho'g' ustida raqs"
"O'rmondagi portal"
"Taym mashin: 1984" (kirill va lotinda alohida) asarlaridir.
She'riy kitobimiz sifati maqtalgan bo'lsa, "O'rmondagi portal" bolalar kitobining muallifi aynan bolaning o'zi ekani eslatilgan. Bu kitobimiz 8+ yosh toifasidagi o'quvchilar uchundir.
"Taym mashin:1984"…
"Taym mashin:1984" asari o'z egalarini topmoqda.
Kitobxon fikri:
Мен сотиб олиб 4 кунда (26-30 май кунлари орасида) ўқиб чиқдим! Фонтастик-тарихий жанрдаги жудаям қизиқ китоб! 10 дан 10 балл!
Автор ижодига мувоффақиятлар тилаб, янгидан янги шунақа қизиқ асарларни кутиб қоламиз!
Husan Haydarov
Siz ham o'qigan, olgan bo'lsangiz fikr va mulohazalarni qoldiring izohda. Kanalda e'lon qilamiz.
📞 Murojaat uchun: @al…
❤4🔥2
Signed Tillajon
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @alp_publishing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 206,316 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALP” (@alp_publishing), 383 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alp_publishing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.