Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алмаз Роботы

@almazrobots

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

319subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001777626112
TypeChannel
Username@almazrobots
DescriptionРассказываю про роботов и различные технологии автоматизации По вопросам - @almazrobotsqxp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/almazrobots

Growth

3197 Aug 2026, 11:55 — 319 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:32 — 319 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:558 Aug 2026, 07:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 318–320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:32319no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:55319first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 10 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
291
Videos
30
Links
149

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2765.9%
1024.4%
❤‍🔥37.32%
custom 528313930974076537912.44%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @almazrobots. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 March 2026 to 2 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Apr 2026, 06:51 UTC448 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

TO THE MOON! 🚀 🌑 🌒 🌓 Зафиксируем историческое событие - впервые за 50 лет с Земли на Луну отправился пилотируемый экипаж. Облетят Луну и обратно, простое приключение на 10 дней, вошел и вышел. Информационная справка о проекте (посмотрите на второй вкладке инфографику динамическую, захватывающе конечно)

🔥8custom 52831393097407653791

19 Mar 2026, 14:01 UTC396 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

AI-native отделы появляются быстрее, чем компании успевают перестроить свой HR. Недавно писал про орг. дизайн в топ-10 компании мира: 1 менеджер на 50 человек, все артефакты через Claude, а руками пишешь — получаешь объяснительную. Но вот вопрос, который мало кто задаёт: а кто перепроектирует саму организационную обвязку под эту новую реальность? Грейды, ФОТ, юрисдикции, оформление людей в трёх странах, приём дене

2🔥2

16 Mar 2026, 21:52 UTC331 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ChatGPT 5.3-5.4 Thinking решает любую HARD задачу. Есть очень популярный сайт для упражнений в программировании - LeetCode. Его используют для оценки знаний разработчика при приеме на работу, например. По крайней мере раньше это было достаточно серьезным преимуществом при собеседовании показать в своем портфолио ссылку на литкод. А сейчас? Тоже в целом хорошо, но уже не показатель. Как обычно - из-за нейронок. Л

4

12 Mar 2026, 22:14 UTC375 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вайбкодеры, ̶ч̶т̶о̶ ̶с̶ ̶л̶и̶ц̶о̶м̶ как дела? Знакомьтесь, один из знаковых AI-предпринимателей - Бен Аффлек, продал 3-летнюю ИИ-фирму Нетфликсу за 600 млн баксов. В 2022 году, как и многие из нас, упоролся в MidJourney и нейросети, начал смотреть как их использовать в кинематографе. Подозреваю, что это было на фоне зарождающейся волны возмущений аниматоров и профсоюзов киноделов, которые говорили НЕТ ИИ В ТВОРЧЕ

🔥92

12 Mar 2026, 00:21 UTC341 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ARC с Кэти Вуд во главе выпустили отчет по большим идеям 2026 года. Там очень много лишнего про блокчейны, биткоины и прочее. Это конечно связано с тем, какую прорву денег туда засадили эти ребята и греют рынок в ожидании прибыли. Поэтому вычитал и записал для видео с ключевыми выводами нескольких слайдов из 110 страничного отчета: - 1, 8, 13, 20, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 33, 34, 37, 62, 64, 74, 77, 89, 102, 103 Мне ос

❤‍🔥3

10 Mar 2026, 21:23 UTC219 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Большие компании делают большие ставки на AI. Но это может выходить боком. Возможно это цена будущей победы, но также и поражения от более осторожных конкурентов. Кто быстрее, заяц или черепаха?

🔥2

10 Mar 2026, 10:55 UTC231 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

AI-native отделы - наше ближайшее будущее. Игорь @ai_product поделился интересным разговором с разрабом из крупнейшей международной компании (топ-10 по капитализации). Орг. дизайн: - 1 менеджер на 50 сотрудников. - ВСЕ АРТЕФАКТЫ: код, документы, требования, презентации, дизайн - пишутся через Claude Codex/CODEX - Claude Code подключен через собственную обвязку безопасности, чтобы закрывать корпоративные риски. Про

🔥52

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @almazrobots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 538,022 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алмаз Роботы” (@almazrobots), 319 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almazrobots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.