Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алло, Ада

Channel

Алло, Ада

@allo_ada

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

281subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002511570132
TypeChannel
Username@allo_ada
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/allo_ada

Growth

276281278.56 August 2026 — 276 subscribers6 August 2026 — 276 subscribers15 August 2026 — 281 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–282 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:26281+5
6 Aug 2026, 23:31276no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:31276first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.9%
avg views ÷ 281 subscribers
Avg views / post
166
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (21 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total993
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

266 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8331.2%
🔥7427.8%
👍4316.2%
❤‍🔥2810.5%
👏134.89%
🎉114.14%
🥰41.50%
🐳31.13%
👨‍💻31.13%
🆒10.376%
😁10.376%
🤩10.376%
🦄10.376%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC155 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У нас снова немного про софт-скиллы 😉 В этот раз наша гостья - Гала Емец, тренер по подготовке публичных выступлений, расскажет много нового о том, как неумение разговаривать у IT-специалистов мешает им в карьерном продвижении и что с этим делать 🤔 Кирилл и Гала в новом подкасте постарались так же разобраться: • почему с приходом ИИ умение говорить стало очень важным для senior-позиций; • как готовиться к созвонам

🔥95🥰4👍1

24 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC169 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Митап закончился! Всем спасибо, кто был! Хороших выходных, а мы скоро продолжим ❤️

❤‍🔥73🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC165 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥3❤‍🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC163 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥41

24 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC167 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Скоро начинаем! 7й этаж офиса ВК на Красном мосту❤️

6🔥5

23 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC174 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ждем вас завтра на нашем уютном митапе! Готовьтесь, будут кружки 🙃

5

12 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC471 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Зовем на митап "Старый добрый Go в мире AI-агентов" 24 июля в 18:30 Санкт-Петербурге - офис VK (ТДЦ «У Красного моста», наб. реки Мойки, 73) Совместно с VK мы, канал IT-подкастов "Алло, Ада", устраиваем Go-митап о том, как он живет в новой реальности разработки с AI-агентами, интегрируясь в инженерный контур облаков и инфраструктуры В программе 3 доклада и целый круглый стол, на которых мы с вами: - разберемся, ка

🔥54👏3👍1

10 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC277 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Что же, сегодня не четверг, но подкаст мы донесли 😁 Встречайте - Дмитрий Буров! Гость, который с нами уже был, но который в этот раз раскроет не техническую, а более софтовую тематику IT ☝️ Мы поговорим про построение комьюнити внутри компаний. Дмитрий несколько лет выстраивал go-сообщество и знает, о чем говорит. А именно о сложностях, выгорании. А еще о пользе и необходимости наличия таких гильдий/сообществ для с

🔥9👍53😁1🆒1

25 Jun 2026, 15:32 UTC305 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У нас сегодня четверг - самое время для нового подкаста! В совместном треке с конференцией GolangConf мы продолжаем общаться с представителями Go-сообщества Новым гостем подкаста стал Владимир Балун, который расскажет о параллелях между С++ и Go, об их сильных и слабых сторонах. Мы пообщались и на счет того, стоит ли сейчас идти программировать на плюсах и что надо знать go-разработчику, если он вдруг все же захоче

🔥7👍64🤩1

14 Jun 2026, 09:28 UTC330 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Небольшое объявление! По разным причинам наш розыгрыш продлился на пару дней дольше) В ближайшую неделю свяжемся с победителями и передадим им билеты! Увидимся на полях конференций!

9

11 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTC321 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Существует ли второй пилот для разработчика? 🤔 Конечно! О так называемом Copilot Code поговорили с Антоном Удаловым из MagnitTech, который рассказал о самой технологии, ее реальной разработке, преимуществе внедрения собственного решения, а также проблемах, в том числе с контекстными окнами и нюансами архитектуры 🧐 Смотрим выпуск на всех площадках: 🎥 YouTube 🎥 VK 🎥 RuTube

🔥64🐳3👨‍💻3🦄1

5 Jun 2026, 08:03 UTC317 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

РЕБЯТА! На носу две крупные IT-конференции, а у нас новый розыгрыш билетов! 💪 Совсем скоро пройдут: - Saint HighLoad++ в Санкт-Петербурге 22 и 23 июня; - Saint TeamLead Conf тоже в Санкт-Петербурге, но 25 и 26 июня. В связи с чем предлагаем вам возможность получить бесплатные билеты на одну из конференций, заполнив форму по ссылке! У нас по одному оффлайн и по два онлайн-билета на каждую из конференций. Правила про

8👍3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allo_ada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 343,217 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алло, Ада” (@allo_ada), 281 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allo_ada.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.