Channel
@allcallsignsinfogroup
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
360subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001413608534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allcallsignsinfogroup |
| Created | 21 December 2020 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allcallsignsinfogroup |
Local community β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:07 | 360 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 361 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 363 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 362 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 363 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 363 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 33 | 55.9% | |
| β€ | 8 | 13.6% | |
| β‘ | 6 | 10.2% | |
| π | 4 | 6.78% | |
| π«‘ | 3 | 5.08% | |
| π‘ | 2 | 3.39% | |
| π€¬ | 2 | 3.39% | |
| π | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π¨ BEACON UPDATE: FOUNDπ¨ Russell from the Merseyside area, for whom we recently launched a beacon alert, has been located and is receiving support. Thank you to everyone who shared this post and helped bring about a positive result. #BeaconAlert #Found
π1π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π3
π¨ BEACON ALERT - MISSING VETERAN - SERIOUS CONCERNS FOR WELFARE π¨ Have you seen Russell Brookes? There are serious concerns for Russell's welfare, and police are appealing for information to help locate him. Description: 43 β’ 5'8" tall β’ Medium build β’ Short mousey-coloured hair β’ Tribal tattoo on his left arm β’ Large tattoo on his right calf β’ Possibly wearing grey shorts and a light blue hooded top Last seen: Rβ¦
π3β‘1
Iβd like to ask a favour of all of you. Can you push this out to your followers on any social media platforms that you may have. Iβm behind this push for October to be recognised as Veterans Month. Iβm sick of seeing these lefty politicians alphabet people and the Islamists being recognised every day of the bloody year. No one is being asked for money, maybe if people can contribute big or small directly to the veterβ¦
π3
Jane has been located and is safe. Thank you to everyone who shared our alert.ππ
β€2π2β‘1
BEACON ALERT MISSING VETERAN Jane Todd is missing with serious concerns for her wellbeing, after leaving her home in the North Shields area on Sunday night 05/07. Her family say Jane booked a taxi, but they do not know which taxi company she used or where she was travelling to, but believe she may have been going somewhere to watch the England game. Her phone is turned off, and she is not receiving calls, texts or Whβ¦
β‘1π1
π¨ BEACON UPDATE FOUND π¨ We've received an update that Scott from Dorset has been located and is safe. Thank you to everyone who shared this alert and helped bring about a positive result.
β€3π2β‘1
π¨ BEACON ALERT MISSING VETERAN π¨ There are serious concerns for the welfare of Scott Yates, 45, who has been reported missing. Last Known Location: Blandford Forum, Dorset Last Contact: 24 June Scott does not have access to a vehicle but is known to travel using public transport, including trains, and may also accept lifts. If you have seen Scott, or have any information that could help locate him, please contacβ¦
π2
Photo, posted without a caption
β€3π1
Photo, posted without a caption
β‘1
Daniel from Taunton has been reported safe by Avon & Somerset Police. Thank you to everyone who helped bring about a positive result.
π3β‘1
Photo, posted without a caption
π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allcallsignsinfogroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βALL CALL SIGNS ππβ (@allcallsignsinfogroup), 360 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allcallsignsinfogroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.