Channel
@InTheStormNews1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,421subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001761543607 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @InTheStormNews1 |
| Created | 27 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/InTheStormNews1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 3,421 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 3,425 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 3,431 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 3,432 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 3,432 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
163 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 78 | 47.9% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 30.7% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 9.82% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 5.52% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.07% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.613% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2024 to 31 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
In The Storm News pinned a photo
I.T.S.N. presents: 🔥 'Anonymous Disclosure Drip, Drip, Flood.' Aug 3🔥 👀 here 👉🏻: https://rumble.com/v59kgph-itsn-presents-anonymous-disclosure-drip-drip-flood.-aug-3.html. 🔥Please Share. Thx. I.T.S.N. 🐸🐇🍿 (Rumble/Truth Social/ Telegram, X.) #Anonymous, #Israel, #communism, #PresidentialElection2024, #coup, #Truth, #Luciiferian, #NCSWIC, #spiritualwarfare, #WWG1WGA, #psychwar, #crimesagainsthumanity, #undergrou…
👍25❤6🙏2👌1👎1😈1
England's fields are not to be tarnished, Nor undone. Her grace needn't be soiled, Nor over run. Her beauty needn't turn ugly, Her gowns better kept clean For England is no mole hill, She is our queen.
❤12👍2🔥2
www.nationalstrikeaustralia.org
👏15❤4
In The Storm News pinned a video
This clip w/ Hannity, Jarrett, and Gorka is absolute fire. They speak of “boomerangs”, “the hunt for Red October”, “floodgates opening”, Sessions, Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein, Russia Collusion, and Spygate. Basically - in 7 minutes, they beat the hell out of the first 100-150 drops. Ready for the kicker? This video is from 10/24/2017 … 4 days BEFORE Q’s first drop. 👀 X-POST
👍13❤2🔥2
In The Storm News pinned a video
⚖️. Post from August 2023 Save this one 🙏🫶⌛️
👍17❤2👏1
https://rumble.com/v59jci1-heydonmusicpage-latest-videos-and-breaking-news-8.03.24.html
Once we were warriors. 🐸⚔️🌎
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @InTheStormNews1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,064,985 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@InTheStormNews1 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“In The Storm News” (@InTheStormNews1), 3,421 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/InTheStormNews1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.