Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алиорам алтайский

Channel

Алиорам алтайский

@alio_altai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

364subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001074618600
TypeChannel
Username@alio_altai
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alio_altai

Growth

364365364.56 August 2026 — 365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 365 subscribers13 August 2026 — 364 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 364–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:05364-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:02365no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:19365first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 364 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held8 (24 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total167
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6447.8%
2619.4%
👍2417.9%
😁118.21%
🥰85.97%
🤔10.746%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC89 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я вам больше скажу: я вот перевожу не то что нон-фикшен, а вообще научпоп. Причём не по истории искусств, а по палеонтологии. Но даже у меня два раза в книгах стихи попадались.

🔥10

30 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC78 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @translationguru

в отличие от многих литературно одаренных коллег, которые поступали на пер- и филфаки с осознанным желанием переводить байронов и шекспиров, я никогда не считала, что буду иметь хоть какое-то отношение к переводу стихов или он ко мне а потом началась реальная работа и выяснилось, что копирайтеры любят рифмы в слоганах и теглайнах, а бренды — песни в видео-роликах (мазафака) что 99,9% авторов нехудожественных книг

14 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC168 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Получил авторский экземпляр журнала. Внутри — моя статья, на обложке — мой сын)

🔥2410👍5

9 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC214 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Тесен книжный диномир. Прислали на рецензию книжку про динозавров, а я у нее был научным редактором)

😁11👍76🤔1

7 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC192 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Документалка про «Динозавров» Посмотрел тут интервью с создателями «Динозавров». Кто не в курсе — это такой документальный минисериал, который вышел весной на Нетфликсе. Очень хороший, мне понравился. Так вот, видео. С одной стороны, это, конечно, маркетинг. «Посмотрите, как мы хорошо поработали, а потом подпишитесь на Нетфликс и сам сериал тоже посмотрите». Но с другой стороны, сколько у этих мужиков энтузиазма, с

10👍6

2 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC178 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nemarshakPhoto

Анита Леманн, Жан-Батист Обен, Йоонас Сильдре «Большая книга числа Пи» Эта замечательная книга про загадочное число Пи появилась благодаря сотрудничеству увлеченных авторов: Анита любит писать, Жан-Батист любит математику, Йоонас любит рисовать, мышонок Пи-рат любит спрашивать, лошадка Пиппа любит цифры. А когда столько любовей сходятся в одной точке, то непременно получается что-то стоящее и интересное. Так и ест

🥰5

2 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вынужден признаться: я из этих. Когда выходит очередной перевод, я как одержимый читаю все отзывы на лайвлибе и маркетплейсах, до каких могу дотянуться. Гуглю рецензии и отзывы людей в соцсетях. А уж если выходит рецензия на профильных сайтах, это вообще мед. В идеале, конечно, хотелось бы прочитать «О господи, это лучший перевод, какой я читала, моя жизнь никогда не будет прежней, хочу детей от переводчика!». Но д

🔥7👍1

24 Jun 2026, 09:58 UTC203 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пи-пи-пи Получил авторские наконец-то)

🔥23👍5🥰3

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @alio_altai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,226,858 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алиорам алтайский” (@alio_altai), 364 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alio_altai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.