2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 683–685 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 16:38
684
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:03
684
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.9%
avg views ÷ 684 subscribers
Avg views / post
239
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
20 (12 July 2025 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
956
Reactions total
28
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
62
Videos
11
Links
97
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
83
38.6%
👏
67
31.2%
👍
65
30.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اخلاق و دگرگونی سیاسی؛ تاملی بر اخلاق اصلاح طلبی
مسئله معما گونه اخلاق و دگرگونی سیاسی که در این مقاله به آن پرداخته شده است، ما را با پرسش پر اهمیت نقطه عزیمت و آغاز دگرگونی سیاسی روبرو میسازد. کواکبی از نخستین اندیشمندانی بود که به اهمیت این مسئله پیبرد و پارادوکسیکال و تناقض آمیز بودن آن را آشکار کرد. او نشان داد که استبداد اخلاق را فاسد میکند، در عین حال بدون تحول و اصلاح اخلاقی جامعه نمیتوان به ریشه کن شد…
اخلاق و دگرگوني سياسي؛ تاملی بر اخلاق اصلاح طلبی
معمای رابطه اخلاق و دگرگونی سیاسی مسئلهای است که جوامع غیر دموکراتیک و استبدادی در فرایند تحول خود با آن روبرو هستند. از یک سو چنین نظامهایی بحران و فساد اخلاق عمومی را در پی دارند، از سوی دیگر تجربه نشان داده است گذار از چنین نظامهایی بدون اصلاح اخلاقی تغییری دمکراتیک را به دنبال ندارد. عبدالرحمن کواکبی از نخستین اندیشمندان مسلمان است که به این معضل توجه کرده است.…
ای نور دیده صلح به از جنگ و داوری!
فضای کشور بوی آغاز جنگی دیگر میدهد. بدخواهانی که ناجوانمردانه به ایران یورش بردند و کودکان بی گناه میناب را به خاک و خون کشیدند، بار دیگر بر طبل جنگ زده و یاوهگویانه از ویرانی این مرز و بوم دم میزنند. اما میهندوستان تنها به نجات ایران میاندیشند و چون حکیم طوس نگرانند که مبادا:
بدین جنگ ننگی به ایران شود
بر و بوم ما پاک ویران شود
و این سخن او را زمزمه میکنند:
که از جنگ و پی…
بنبست ژئوپولیتیک و چشم انداز برون رفت
تشدید تنشها بار دیگر به موج نگرانی از سرگیری جنگ دامن زده است. آمریکا که از دید بسیاری از ناظران به اهداف خود در جنگ چهلروزه دست نیافت، در تلاش برای تضعیف ج.ا. ایران و ایجاد اجماع جهانی علیه آن است. سفر ترامپ به ترکیه و شرکت او در نشست ناتو نیز در همین راستا ارزیابی میشود. ایران نیز برای حفظ تنگه هرمز، به عنوان مهمترین برگ برنده راهبردی خود، تلاش میکند.
تفاهم اخیر میان دو…
اسطوره بیطرفی!
پندارها نقشی انکار ناپذیر و حذف ناشدنی در برداشت ما از جهان و فهم حقیقت دارند. اسطورهها دستپرورده همین واقعیتاند و «الگوهای پنداشتی هستند که فهم و برداشت ما از جهان و حقایق را شکل میدهند». اسطوره بیطرفی یکی از آنهاست که به معنای ناسوگیری و نگاه غیر جانبدارانه به واقعیتها برای فهم بهتر و درست تر آنها است. در این جا مسئله اعتبار و روایی آن نیست، بلکه مسئله امکان آن و کمکی است که میتواند به فه…
آزمندی در سیاست!
بر شاهنامه پژوهان پوشیده نیست که دوگانه «خرد» و «آز» و تقابل میان آن دو، جایگاهی بنیادین در فلسفه اخلاق و بینش سیاسی فردوسی دارد. او هر گاه سخن از خرد و اهمیت آن به میان میآورد، نیمنگاهی به نقطه و قطب مقابل آن «آز» دارد و خطر گرفتار شدن خرد در چنگ آن را گوشزد میکند. تقابل این دو چنان است که تمامی نیکیها و بدی هایِ زندگی بشر را میتوان به آنها بازگرداند.
«خرد» نیروی «شناسنده نیک و بد» و راهنما…
دفاع از آزادگی یا جان دادن در راه عقیده؟!
در انقلاب ۵۷ شعارِ «إنَّ الحياةَ عقيدةٌ وجهاد» ورد زبان بسیاری از انقلابیها بود و با انتساب به امام حسین(ع)، در شکلدادن به فهم عمومی از نهضت و شهادت او نقشی مهم داشت. زندهیاد علی شریعتی نیز در خوانش انقلابی خود از عاشورا، با تأکید بر آن، یکی از مسئولیتهای شیعه بودن را آن میدانست که «زندگی را عقیده و جهاد بفهمد». پژواک این شعار پس از انقلاب نیز خاموش نشد و در تداوم برخی …
دین و صلح پایدار؛ نگاهی کارکرد گرایانه!
در جهان امروز، شاهد یک پارادوکس هستیم. از یک سو، دین همچنان یکی از قدرتمندترین منابع معنا، هویت و جهتگیری اخلاقی است. از سوی دیگر، بسیاری از خشونتآمیزترین و بیثباتکنندهترین درگیریها در دنیای معاصر - درست یا غلط - با هویتها، روایتها یا تفاسیر مذهبی مرتبط هستند. این پارادوکس به طرح این پرسش میانجامد: آیا دین ذاتاً منبع درگیری است یا میتواند به عنوان پایهای برای صلح پ…
معمای تنگه هرمز؛ جنگ، بازدارندگی یا توافق؟
بحرانهای بین المللی را میتوان زلزلهای سیاسی دانست که نظم بین الملل را به لرزه میاندازد. آنها همچون زلزلههای طبیعی از نظر شدت یا درجه ویرانگری و دامنه تفاوت دارند و بسته به میزان این دو، تاثیرگذاریشان متفاوت خواهد بود. همانطور که از میان انبوه زلزلههایی که هر سال در جهان رخ میدهد، اندکی از آن ها خیلی شدید هستند، بحرانهای بین المللی شدید و ویرانگر نیز بسیار اندکند…
❤3
Signed علی میرموسوی
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alimirmoosavi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 419,459 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“میرموسوی” (@alimirmoosavi), 684 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alimirmoosavi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
