22 Mar 2026, 05:00 UTC362 viewsread 8 August 2026
Eng xafvli inson chala tushunib qattiq ishonadigan insondir. © Anton Chexov
Channel
Ali Odiljonov | Blog
@ali_odiljonov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
175subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001447721865 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ali_odiljonov |
| Description | Dasturlash - bu texnika emas, fikrlash madaniyati Bog'lanish: @appealtome_bot |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ali_odiljonov |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 175 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 175 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 11
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 10
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ali_odiljonov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2025 to 22 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
18 Mar 2026, 06:27 UTC437 viewsread 8 August 2026
Ko‘pchilik Senior dasturchini "kodlarni yoddan biladigan daho" deb tasavvur qiladi. Ammo haqiqat ancha sodda va qiziqroq. Junior va Senior o‘rtasidagi asosiy farq Seniorning xotirasi kuchliligida emas, balki uning savol berish mahoratida. Bugungi kunda Google, Stack Overflow va ayniqsa Claude/ChatGPT kabi sun’iy intellektlar barcha javoblarni biladi. Endi muammo javob topishda emas, muammoni qanday savol berib hal…
5 Mar 2026, 01:00 UTC392 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Bannister effekti 1950-yillarda bir qarash bor edi: 1 milni(1.609 km) 4 daqiqadan tez yugurish — fiziologik jihatdan imkonsiz. Shifokorlar ham, sportchilar ham, olimlar ham shunday deyishgan. Go‘yoki inson tanasining chegarasi bor edi. Hamma bunga ishongan. Faqat bir insondan tashqari. U — Roger Bannister. Va u 1 milni 3:59 daqiqada yugurib o‘tdi. Lekin eng qiziq joyi bu emas. Shundan keyin, o‘sha yilning o‘zi…
23 Feb 2026, 08:43 UTC379 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Hamma kelajakdan qo‘rqyapti. — AI bizni almashtiradi — Dasturchilarga talab kamayadi — Dizaynerlarga ish qolmayabdi va hokazo Odamlar go‘yoki kelajakda qandaydir kuch bilan urushishi kutilayotgandek gapirishyabdi. Aslida esa biz boshqa odamlar bilan raqobatdamiz, xolos. Dasturchilarga talab kamayadi degani, bu hamma uchun emas. Eng zaif natija ko‘rsatganlar chiqib ketadi. Sun’iy intellekt ham eng sust o‘qituvchin…
3 Dec 2025, 08:53 UTC610 viewsread 8 August 2026
AI kod yozayabdi dasturlashni o'rganish kerakmi? Ko‘pchilik yangi boshlovchilar: “AI hamma narsani qiladi, dasturlashni o‘rganish shart emas” deb o‘ylayapti. Aslida esa — unday emas. Dasturlash — bu faqat kod yozishni o'rganish emas. Bu tizim qanday ishlashini, qanday qismlar bir-biriga ta’sir qilishini tushunishdir. Frontend qayerdan ma’lumot oladi, backend qanday javob qaytaradi, devops nima uchun kerak — bular…
12 Nov 2025, 08:40 UTC535 viewsread 8 August 2026
Har bir erkak nimagadir qaram bo‘ladi. Kimdir pulga qaram, kimdir ayollarga, kimdir chekishga yoki ichkilikka. Lekin haqiqiy erkak — intizomga qaram bo‘ladi. Chunki aynan intizom seni keyingi bosqichga olib chiqadi. Intizom seni issiq to‘shagingdan tortib chiqaradi. Intizom seni istamagan ishni qilishga majbur qiladi. Charchagan, tushkunlikka tushgan yoki sinib qolgan bo‘lsang ham — intizomga farqi yo‘q. U shu…
6 Nov 2025, 10:42 UTC528 viewsread 8 August 2026
"Bu oddiy narsaku" - Danning-Kryuger effekti frontend o‘qituvchisi nigohida Men bir necha yildan beri frontend yo'nalishida dars berib kelaman va shu vaqt ichida har doim bir qiziq holatga duch kelaman. Har bir guruhdagi o'quvchilarim orasida Danning-Kryuger effektini kuzataman. Har doim hamma narsani tez ilg‘ab oladigan bir nechta o‘quvchilar bo‘ladi. Ular birinchi bo‘lib uy vazifasini bajarishadi, kodni ishonch…
27 Oct 2025, 09:42 UTC509 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Ildizingni unutma Bilasanmi? Odam hayotda yuksalib borgani sari, kimlar bilan boshlaganini unutib qo‘yar ekan. Bugun sening atrofingda ko‘plab odamlar, tabassumlar, olqishlar bo‘lishi mumkin. Ammo bir paytlar sen hech kim bo‘lmagan paytingda, hech kim ishonmaganda senga ishongan, yoningda turgan insonlar bor edi — ular senga yo‘l ko‘rsatgan, dalda bergan, “bo‘ladi” deganlar edi. Shularni unutish — o‘z ildizingni …
26 Oct 2025, 10:10 UTC421 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Yaqinda biz OPEN WEB jamoamiz bilan President Tech Award Hackathon Season 2025’da qatnashdik. Yo‘nalish — Fintech, vazifa — 3 kun ichida moliyaviy muammoga real texnik yechim yaratish. Shunday qilib, Finman nomli loyiha tug‘ildi. Maqsad — moliyaviy shaffoflik, tezkor analitika va avtomatlashtirilgan jarayonlar. Finman nimalar qila oladi? — Live transaction monitoring: to‘lov tizimlaridan kelayotgan pul oqimlarin…
19 Oct 2025, 17:14 UTC409 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
President TechAward Hackaton - Season 2025 Biz yutqazib yutdik!!! :)
30 Sept 2025, 07:16 UTC565 viewsread 8 August 2026
Motivatsiya emas — tizim kerak Yaqinda “yapon intizomi” haqida o‘qib qoldim va bu yondashuv meni soddaligi bilan o'ziga tortdi. Yaponlar buni “mayda qadamlar kuchi” deb atashar ekan. Biz ko‘pincha hammasini birdan o‘zgartirmoqchi bo'lamiz: 05:00 da turish, yugurish, to‘g‘ri ovqatlanish, 50 sahifa kitob, kuniga 2–3 soat deep work… Natija? Ikki-uch kun kuchli motivatsiya, keyin esa — divan va “dushanbadan boshlayman…
18 Sept 2025, 05:55 UTC528 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Ishimiz yuzasidan har xil bino egalari bilan ko‘rishib turaman. Yillar davomida bitta qonuniyatni kuzatdim: Bizdagi boylarning ko‘pi ko‘ringanidan ancha boyroq bo‘lib chiqadi. Ya‘ni, darajasiga nisbatan oddiyroq yuradi. Balki, status xaridlariga ortiqcha pul ketkazmaganlari uchun ham, aktivlarga pul yig‘a olishgandir. Bir vaqtning o‘zida, puli yo‘qlarning o‘zini boyroq qilib ko‘rsatayotganini kuzatamiz. Bo‘lib to…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ali_odiljonov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,064,240 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ali Odiljonov | Blog” (@ali_odiljonov), 175 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ali_odiljonov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.