Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بوح الشعر 🖤🎻

Channel

بوح الشعر 🖤🎻

@alharbiah123

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,153subscribers

+232 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001185052002
TypeChannel
Username@alharbiah123
Descriptionسلامُ لمن يحمل الحب للجميع و يتمنى الخير للكل ✨❤️.. https://t.me/+bZysd38q4D42NWE0
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alharbiah123

Growth

14,92115,15315,0376 August 2026 — 14,921 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,941 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,991 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,011 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,064 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,077 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,094 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,110 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,131 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,153 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +232. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,886–15,188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:0715,153+22
14 Aug 2026, 09:5515,131+21
13 Aug 2026, 01:3415,110+16
12 Aug 2026, 00:5215,094+17
10 Aug 2026, 21:4515,077+13
9 Aug 2026, 20:5515,064+53
8 Aug 2026, 18:4215,011+20
7 Aug 2026, 21:2614,991+50
6 Aug 2026, 20:0514,941+20
6 Aug 2026, 05:1914,921first reading

Engagement

282 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.57%
avg views ÷ 15,153 subscribers
Avg views / post
238
282 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
282
of 282 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 228 of 282 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held282 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total67,171
Reactions total947
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,900
Videos
7,190
Links
124

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
52m 31s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 106 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

809 reactions across 214 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44154.5%
👏9311.5%
🔥8710.8%
👍799.77%
😍496.06%
❤‍🔥242.97%
👌202.47%
🤣91.11%
🫡50.618%
💔10.124%
😐10.124%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 228 of the 282 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 947reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 282 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC34 viewsread 15 August 2026

كروب دردشه مختلطه : ♥🔥,

Signed - مُجـلد 𝗟7𝗡 .

15 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏ لا ماتت الاحلام . . في وجه الظروف، ‏ جعل العوض في الباقيات الصالحات !

1

15 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

مع إني بذلت الجهد كله عشان انساك ‏ماعندي سبب مقنع .. يخليني أخليك .

4

15 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC121 viewsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙻𝚒𝚘000𝚘𝚗

15 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC119 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3

Signed 𝙻𝚒𝚘000𝚘𝚗

15 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC120 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏ ثُم إن.... ‏ من أجمل أنواع الرزق.... ‏ شخص يُطيّب خاطرك ويستثنيك.... ‏ عن الجميع مهما كلّفه الأمر... ‏ مساكم ورد...❤️

3

15 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC122 viewsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙻𝚒𝚘000𝚘𝚗

15 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

2

Signed 𝙻𝚒𝚘000𝚘𝚗

15 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC131 viewsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙻𝚒𝚘000𝚘𝚗

15 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

°° مساء الخير 💕 أنت أقوى مما تظن ، و أجمل مما تعتقد ، فلا تترك للحزن مكاناً في ثنايا روحك ، و اخلق من وجعك قوة تجعلك تمضي في طريقك بقلبٍ مطمئن و ابتسامه واثقه 🍂

3

Signed 𝙻𝚒𝚘000𝚘𝚗

15 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC153 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

‏أبي أخذك من هالناس وأتملكك ‏ " شعور إني أحبك مايكفيني " ‏

4

Signed ۛ ּا̍ڷــڣــڕٰا̍ڜــہ

Showing the 12 most recent of 282 posts we hold for @alharbiah123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

هل استغفرت الله اليوم ؟

  1. اسـتغفِـرالله العظيم وأتوبُ اليه .67%
  2. أستغفرُ الله من كل ذنب وأتوبُ إليه .33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 282 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 191,934 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ذووق الخواطر 🌸❤️
@q_ggi · 153,520
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
زَحمه شعر 📸🌿
@zhmah · 105,376
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
﮼انتي،جميله 🌸 ، عبارات | تحفيزيه🌱
@Einglish_jj · 233,038
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 August 2026
خلفيات💛عبارات💛حب💛كلام
@STORYAT_10 · 344,978
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
‹ أنفاس ﺎلـورد 🌻 .
@alnouree6 · 113,753
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026
اقتباسات روعة 🤍🌱
@shsvsbbs · 230,124
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
مدرسة الخليفي
@y1400h · 140,820
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بوح الشعر 🖤🎻” (@alharbiah123), 15,153 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alharbiah123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.