Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

عبارات عيد ميلاد🤍.

@VXXXXP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,361subscribers

-68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001457043127
TypeChannel
Username@VXXXXP
Descriptionالقناة الرسميه . اقتباسات عيد ميلاد صور صديقات عبارات عيد ميلاد صديقتي معايدات صور اقتباسات عيد ميلاد صور صديقات https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaEJvFv1iUxQf5z5L72t https://t.me/Elllikx
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VXXXXP

Growth

16,36116,42916,3956 August 2026 — 16,429 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,424 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,422 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,414 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,410 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,398 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,376 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,361 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,351–16,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:0716,361-15
11 Aug 2026, 23:2216,376-22
10 Aug 2026, 20:4716,398-12
9 Aug 2026, 19:2116,410-4
8 Aug 2026, 21:1216,414-8
8 Aug 2026, 00:0116,422-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:0216,424-5
6 Aug 2026, 05:1716,429first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.17%
avg views ÷ 16,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
356
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.034%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held47 (31 May 202612 August 2026)
Views total13,867
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
344
Videos
352
Links
291

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 23:55 UTC5 viewsread 13 August 2026

💟الاشيااء التي نحبها نراها بقلوبنا ‏وليي باعيننا قراءة المزيد 🩷

12 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC17 viewsread 13 August 2026

• İsminizi Türkçe kabartma . - زخـرف اسمك بالتركي ♥️🦉 .

12 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC21 viewsread 12 August 2026

🟢اخيييييييييييراً لقيت أفخم قناة بعالم التلگرام ❤️ لأجمل رسائل وأرقى الصور والعبارات العميقة 🖤👇🏻. https://t.me/alharbiah123/139612 https://t.me/alharbiah123/138392?single دقيقة واحذف 🏃🏻‍♀🏃🏻‍♀

12 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC38 viewsread 12 August 2026

‏على الأرض مالك ند يالناعم الحسّاس ‏أنا بس قراءة المزيد 💟

12 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026

صبَاحيِ أنَـت 🌤🤍. رسَائـل غزليـة صباحيةَ لِـ حـبيبيِ🥺.

11 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC56 viewsread 11 August 2026

🟢اخيييييييييييراً لقيت أفخم قناة بعالم التلگرام ❤️ لأجمل رسائل وأرقى الصور والعبارات العميقة 🖤👇🏻. https://t.me/alharbiah123/139612 https://t.me/alharbiah123/138392?single دقيقة واحذف 🏃🏻‍♀🏃🏻‍♀

11 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC125 viewsread 11 August 2026

للمنحرفين فكرياً وعقلياً فقط🕷🚭.

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @VXXXXP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 865,349 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ستوريات ، اقتباسات ، رسائل ، عبارات لـ صديقتي ♥️
@fraind_2 · 175,412
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 August 2026
خلفيات💛عبارات💛حب💛كلام
@STORYAT_10 · 345,549
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
اقتباسات حب ستوريات صور بنات خلفيات
@Raakan_2 · 192,876
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عبارات عيد ميلاد🤍.” (@VXXXXP), 16,361 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VXXXXP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.