Channel
@Butterflyhf
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,550subscribers
-1,085 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001526478554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Butterflyhf |
| Description | " لِـ آخـرتِـــي 🌼🫀 " البداية كانت في 18 / 12 / 2022 _ للتواصل : @Butterflyhfhf_bot ♡ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Butterflyhf |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 8 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 34 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @PpAmera/12060122 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC | @Butterflyhf/120551 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @Butterflyhf/120554 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC | @PpAmera/12061422 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @Butterflyhf/120671 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC | @PpAmera/12104225 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Butterflyhf/120926 · this entry1 Sept 2026, 04:00 UTC | @PpAmera/1218101 Sept 2026, 04:04 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @Butterflyhf/120935 · this entry1 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC | @PpAmera/1218441 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @PpAmera/1299669 Nov 2026, 18:03 UTC | @Butterflyhf/122720 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @PpAmera | 207 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @PpAmera (123–84) |
| @hasan_sheh | 45 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 44 minutes | this entry (40–5) |
| @aaooum | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.9 hours | this entry (14–1) |
| @cfdxe7890 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 86 minutes | this entry (9–1) |
| @RR4MN | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 86 minutes | this entry (9–1) |
| @taeb96 | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3 minutes | this entry (7–0) |
| @ABODIIl | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 26 minutes | this entry (6–0) |
| @Rahiklgana | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 13 hours | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 131 of the 131 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 296 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 34 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Butterflyhf — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 34 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 13,550 | -22 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:56 | 13,572 | -16 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:01 | 13,588 | -31 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:41 | 13,619 | -11 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 13,630 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:11 | 13,639 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:10 | 13,647 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 13,657 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:29 | 13,669 | -18 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 13,687 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 13,701 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 13,721 | -13 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:19 | 13,734 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 13,741 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 13,753 | -13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:49 | 13,766 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:48 | 13,773 | -22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:30 | 13,795 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 13,805 | -20 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 13,825 | first reading |
424 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 122 of 170 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 424 (1 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,911 |
| Reactions total | 203 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
655 reactions across 339 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 617 | 94.2% | |
| 🕊 | 14 | 2.14% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 1.98% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.611% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.611% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.305% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.153% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 339 of the 424 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 655 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 424 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 170 posts held from the last 30 days (1.18%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اليلة ليلة الجمعة فأكثروا فيها من الصلاة على النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم اللهمَّ صلِّ على محمَّد وعلى آل محمَّد، كما صليتَ على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم، إنَّك حميدٌ مجيد. اللهمَّ بارِك على محمَد وعلى آل محمَّد، كما باركتَ على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم، إنَّك حميدٌ مجيد💛
❤1
Signed ݺ، أබȷɹ̤ᓄ ، محمد💜
فضل الصلاة على النبي يوم الجمعة قال رسولُ اللَّه ﷺ: إنَّ مِن أَفْضلِ أيَّامِكُمْ يَوْمَ الجُمُعةِ، فَأَكْثِرُوا عليَّ مِنَ الصلاةِ فِيهِ، فإنَّ صَلاتَكُمْ معْرُوضَةٌ علَيَّ. آلَلَهّمً صّلَ وٌسِلَمً وبًآرکْ عٌلَيَکْ يَآ حًبًيَبًيَ يَآ رسِوٌلَ آلَلَهّ يقول عمر بن الخطاب :- لو علم المؤمنون فضل الصلاه ع النبى ﷺ، لما كفت ألسنتهم عنها كل حين اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ وَبَارِكْ على نَبِيِّنَا مُحمَّدﷺ. ♡ مَنْ …
❤2🕊1
Signed ݺ، أබȷɹ̤ᓄ ، محمد💜
الصلاة الإبراهيمية من أفضل صيغ الصلاة على النبي ﷺ، وقد علّمها النبي ﷺ لأصحابه💛 أكثروا من الصلاة والسلام عليه💛
❤1
Signed ݺ، أබȷɹ̤ᓄ ، محمد💜
🫂 همسة لقلبك... هناك قوة تُسمى "اليقين بالله" بها نتخطى أزماتنا ، ونتحمل وندعو ونستمر في الدعاء ، حتى لو كانت كل الأبواب مغلقة،والظروف ليست ميسرة ، وكل الأسباب توحي بعكس ما نتمنى ، لكننا على يقين أن الله سيُصلح كل شيء في الوقت المناسب ، لأننا نؤمن بالله وقوته وبحكمته وتدبيره.... ثقوا بربكم 💛🌾
❤1
Signed Harases Aya
سُنَّةٌ مَهجُورَةٌ لِلشِّفَاءِ.. كَانَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ إِذَا اشْتَكَى أَحَدٌ، أَوْ كَانَتْ بِهِ قُرْحَةٌ أَوْ جُرْحٌ، فَعَلَ هَكَذَا: الطَّرِيقَةُ النَّبَوِيَّةُ: ¹ . يُبَلِّلُ إِصْبَعَهُ السَّبَّابَةَ بِرِيقِهِ. ² . يَضَعُهَا فِي التُّرَابِ الطَّاهِرِ. ³ . يَمْسَحُ بِهَا مَكَانَ الأَلَمِ وَيَقُولُ الدُّعَاءَ: «بِسْمِ اللهِ، تُرْبَةُ أَرْضِنَا، بِرِيقَةِ بَعْضِنَا، يُشْفَى سَقِيمُنَا، بِإِذْنِ رَبِّنَا». رَوَاهُ …
❤3
Signed Harases Aya
"لا تؤجل حلمك من أجل راحةٍ مؤقتة، فكل صفحة تقرؤها، وكل معلومة تتعلمها، وكل ساعة تجتهد فيها، تقرّبك خطوة من هدفك. تذكّر أن تعب اليوم هو فخر الغد، وأن الله لا يضيع أجر من أحسن عملًا." اجتهد، فنسختك التي تحلم بها تنتظر منك ألّا تستسلم. #تحفيز_دراسي🎓💛
❤5
Signed ݺ، أබȷɹ̤ᓄ ، محمد💜
▫️مقطع قصير | أُولى معالم الهدي: أن تجعل لك وِردًا من كتاب الله لا تخلُٓ به !!
❤4
Signed Harases Aya
لا تحزن لبطء حِفظك للقرآن، لا تمّل من الإعَادة عدّة مرّات، فالوَقت الكثير الذي تأخذه لتحفظ، وتُراجع وتضبط المَخارج، يصَلُح قلبك، ويزيد أجرك ويُهذب جَوارحك، يُوسّع مَداركك يَجعلك شخصًا أفضل، لن تذهب مُجاهدتك هباءًا أبدًا، ستسعَد بها في الدُنيا والآخرة! 💛 يَكفيك أنك ظفرت بوقتٍ أطوَل في صُحبة القرآن 💛
❤1
Signed Harases Aya
لا تنسَ صلاة الضحى.. «ركعتان من الضحى تكفيان عن صدقةٍ لكل مفصل في جسدك، فلا تحرم نفسك أجرها، واجعل لك مع إشراقة كل صباح موعدًا مع الله». صلاة الضحى.. نورٌ في يومك، وأجرٌ في ميزانك. اللهم أعنّا على ذكرك وشكرك وحسن عبادتك💛
❤1
Signed ݺ، أබȷɹ̤ᓄ ، محمد💜
رسالتك اليوم💌💛.
❤1
Signed ݺ، أබȷɹ̤ᓄ ، محمد💜
قمَّةُ الأمان ﴿وَإِلَيهِ يُرجَعُ الأَمرُ كُلُّهُ﴾؛ كلُّــــه لا بعــضه! آية تُحيي القلب وتشفيه وتريحه وتطمئنه. القارئ الشيخ ياسر الدوسري💛
❤4
Signed ݺ، أබȷɹ̤ᓄ ، محمد💜
نصيحة قلبية: "على قدر قربك من الله وخوفك منه في السّر والعلن يُعطيك الله، وعلى قدر إهمالك لطاعته وأوّلها التقصير في الصلاة، والجرأة في الخلوات يُؤخرك الله، هذه الأفعال التي ربّما اعتدتها لها تأثير، وإنّها لَتَحُول بينك وبين استجابة الدُعاء، ووالله لو عَلِمت عُمق تأثيرها لتوقّفت"💛
❤2
Signed Harases Aya
Showing the 12 most recent of 424 posts we hold for @Butterflyhf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Butterflyhf edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @Butterflyhf as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لُِيطُمئن قٌلُِبَي 🌻💛” (@Butterflyhf), 13,550 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Butterflyhf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.