Channel
@alexmgi
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
635subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001445720003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alexmgi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alexmgi |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @alexmgi/3686 · this entry22 Oct 2023, 10:30 UTC | @cryptomagnier/63222 Oct 2023, 10:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cryptomagnier/63429 Nov 2023, 07:32 UTC | @alexmgi/3688 · this entry29 Nov 2023, 07:32 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cryptomagnier/64717 Jun 2024, 12:28 UTC | @alexmgi/3700 · this entry17 Jun 2024, 12:28 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cryptomagnier/6492 Sept 2024, 05:44 UTC | @alexmgi/3701 · this entry2 Sept 2024, 05:45 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cryptomagnier/65418 Sept 2025, 11:57 UTC | @alexmgi/3705 · this entry18 Sept 2025, 11:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cryptomagnier | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @cryptomagnier (5–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 May 2023 to 25 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @alexmgi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 635 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 635 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 11 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
16 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 6 | 37.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2023 to 25 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ВАГОН ПОЛЬЗЫ ПОДЪЕХАЛ вы такое любите Бесплатно показываю от и до как быстро, дешево и легко собирать сайты с вайбкодингом Если вы не используете ещё это в своих запусках — вы, конечно, многое теряете Смотреть видео
😁3👎2
Signed Alex Magnier
Я запустил канал с аудитами смыслов, презентаций, продуктов, сайтов и воронок Делаю это первое время бесплатно. Буду регулярно выбирать проекты на разборы, в ответ буду писать развернутые документы с рекомендациями по тому, что улучшить, чтоб повысить конверсии в оплату и прибыль ваших проектов. Вступайте, все кто использует в своей работе текст, занимается маркетингом и продает что-либо, будет полезно. https://t…
👎2
Signed Alex Magnier
Ребята зашли ко мне на консалтинг с точкой, в которой они за пол года не смогли запустить флагман продукт… Прошли консалтинг за более чем 6000$ и так и остались на уровне «много делаем, готовимся, но так и не запустились» Собирались запустить продукт с решениями за 30-60к и 80к рублей. Когда я зашел в проект — я помог им переделать абсолютно все. Мы создали с нуля воронку, которая принесла 500 продаж трип-ваера с…
👍3👎1
Signed Alex Magnier
Друзья! Спешу вас порадовать, я решил провести еще один бесплатный, мясной, сочный, мощный разбор своего первого зарубежного запуска (точнее, его подготовительного этапа) 💣В этом проекте я уже: поднял в 48.8 средний чек (с 50$ до 2445$) Мы сделали кассу: 66 000$ Проданных мест: 27 Чеки: 1000$-2000$-4000$ Мы сделали это без: • воронок • рассылок • ОП • предзаписи • технички для оплат кредитными картами (которыми пл…
👎1🔥1
Signed Alex Magnier
Всем привет! В четверг в 15:00 по мск проведу Zoom разбор запуска по крипте С отличительными особенностями: 1. Чистая прибыль 48.000$ с 950 человек в боте (воронке) 2. Продажа с веба на высокий чек за 25.000$ (2.3 млн рублей) 3. Сложная тема с продажей будущего, а не прибыли в моменте. Что будет на зум созвоне: ⁃ Разбор стратегии запуска с 0 до 5 млн рублей за месяц ⁃ Структура продающего вебинара на высокий ч…
❤2
Signed Alex Magnier
Там эирдроп в Тоне на OKX еще включился Регайтесь, участвуйте 10$-50$ насыпет) 3 мин займет TONomaniaOKX
Signed Alex Magnier
У Телеграм запустился проект и набрал уже 1 млн пользователей Возможно будет дроп бесплатных токенов, которые можно получить в игре) Все в боте: t.me/notcoin_bot
Signed Alex Magnier
Друзья! Я залил на ютуб свой диджей сет с тусовки Буду очень благодарен лайкам, поддержке, репостам в инсте) Слушайте, наслаждайтесь ❤️ Можно включить дома на телеке большом) https://youtu.be/zMZRpYUa5XM?si=pilFHBzokQKJ8UVU
🔥1
Signed Alex Magnier
Алекс Манье | Alex Magnier pinned «Напоминаю, что завтра стартует мой 7 дневный интенсив по созданию быстрой воронки из 2х лонгридов с высокими конверсиями) Заходите в бота https://t.me/Alexfunnel_bot?start=tg»
Напоминаю, что завтра стартует мой 7 дневный интенсив по созданию быстрой воронки из 2х лонгридов с высокими конверсиями) Заходите в бота https://t.me/Alexfunnel_bot?start=tg
Signed Alex Magnier
Как я отношусь к тому, что Китайский национальный исследовательский центр блокчейна будет обучать от 500 тысяч специалистов для Web 3.0 индустрии? В этом канале я уже неоднократно рассказывал вам о том, что строю свою образовательную компанию в сфере Web3 профессий и обучения заработку в этом рынке. И когда выходят новости из разряда той, что я оставил в заголовке — меня распирает от уверенности в том, что я четко …
Signed Alex Magnier
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @alexmgi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 431,554 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@alexmgi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алекс Манье | Alex Magnier” (@alexmgi), 635 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexmgi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.