Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ☀️Conscious Health☀️

Channel

☀️Conscious Health☀️

@ConsciousHealthOfficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,591subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372547996
TypeChannel
Username@ConsciousHealthOfficial
Descriptionhttps://Conscioushealth.store ✨ Follow Us For Daily Conscious Health Vids 💊 Shop Our Non-GMO American-Made Supplements
Created25 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConsciousHealthOfficial

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,5817,6307,605.56 August 2026 — 7,606 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,605 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,630 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,618 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,614 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,618 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,612 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,611 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,618 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,606 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,602 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,595 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,587 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,586 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,582 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,581 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,591 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,589 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,600 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,598 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,604 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,601 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,603 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,596 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,594 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,591 subscribers7,5916 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,574–7,637 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:387,591-3
6 Nov 2026, 00:297,594-2
2 Nov 2026, 18:467,596-7
30 Oct 2026, 15:067,603+2
27 Oct 2026, 10:297,601-3
24 Oct 2026, 05:577,604+6
21 Oct 2026, 12:577,598-2
18 Oct 2026, 14:417,600+11
15 Oct 2026, 12:387,589-2
12 Oct 2026, 11:387,591+10
5 Oct 2026, 20:567,581-1
28 Sept 2026, 20:417,582-4
16 Sept 2026, 08:007,586-1
12 Sept 2026, 19:387,587-8
8 Sept 2026, 16:367,595-7
2 Sept 2026, 23:487,602-4
30 Aug 2026, 21:347,606-12
27 Aug 2026, 15:537,618+7
24 Aug 2026, 22:177,611-1
21 Aug 2026, 07:587,612first reading

Engagement

200 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.39%
avg views ÷ 7,591 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
85
of 200 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held200 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total15,413
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈27,200
Videos
≈19,100
Links
≈4,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 19m
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 85 posts held from the last 30 days (4.71%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC252 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Your thyroid is the MOTOR of your body. As Dr. Sebi said — it regulates heat, energy, metabolism, weight, movement, and your nervous system. When it lacks minerals, everything slows down. You feel cold, tired, and unbalanced. And what does your thyroid need to fire properly? Iodine + minerals from natural sea plants. That's why Sea Moss has been used for generations: 🌊 Naturally rich in Iodine — the key mineral …

5 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC253 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

​🌿 The Ancient Secret of Natural Healing ​Did you know that nature holds the key to every single human illness? 🌱✨ For centuries, traditional wisdom has pointed to a profound truth: plants are our most powerful allies in health and healing. 🌞@ConsciousHealthOfficial

5 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC249 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

I got one for Christmas and everyone wanted to borrow it

Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @ConsciousHealthOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ConsciousHealthOfficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Experience with cannabis

  1. I smoke it everyday11%
  2. I stick to tinctures and Edibles only (daily)0%
  3. I'll smoke once or twice a week4%
  4. I'll take a tincture/ edibles once or twice a week4%
  5. I'll do it once a month or so15%
  6. All indulge once or twice a year7%
  7. It's been years since I've touched any cannabis products33%
  8. Never have touched cannabis and I never will19%
  9. Stal (no vote. Results)19%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Did you smoke cigarettes when you were younger?

  1. I still smoke cigarettes now9%
  2. I used to chain smoke but I don't smoke now13%
  3. I smoked a little bit in my younger years but not much17%
  4. I tried it once or twice but didn't like it30%
  5. Never tried it. Never would26%
  6. Stal (no vote)4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Hidden In Plain Sight
@hiddeninplainsight1 · 38,084
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 31 August 2026
144,000 Light Warriors
@DavideB144 · 29,927
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 7 September 2026
Sapphire Skye 5D OFFICIAL💜💟
@SapphireSkyeOfficial · 31,252
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
Quantum Medicine ️⚡
@QuantumMedicineFree · 32,284
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 5 September 2026
Dr. Alan Mandell
@alan_mandell_official · 22,537
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr. Jeevesh yadav notes
@Jeevesh_yadav_notes · 30,915
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 6 September 2026
🌱Gardener's Secrets🌱
@GardeningSecrets · 26,908
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 September 2026
Alternative Medicine
@natural_meds · 28,528
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 September 2026
Natural Remedies 🥦
@NaturalRemediesUsa · 30,679
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 6 September 2026
USEFUL TIPS | LIFEHACKS💡
@Useful_Tips_Lifehacks · 33,657
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
Natural Healing 🥦
@Natural_Healing_USA · 70,641
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Barbara O'Neill
@barbara_oneill · 26,584
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 September 2026
SECRETS OF HEALTH
@secret_health1 · 42,475
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
TRADITIONAL MEDICINE🌿🌸
@Traditional_Medicine_folk · 34,188
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 September 2026
Health Tips🍀
@Health_Tips_USA · 51,731
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Barbara O'neill
@BarbaraOneillOfficial · 65,711
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 August 2026
Amazing Facts💡
@amazingfacts4 · 32,557
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
Beautiful universe
@BeautifulUniverse11 · 20,965
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 September 2026
Majestic 12 Hub
@Majestic12Mirror · 22,187
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“☀️Conscious Health☀️” (@ConsciousHealthOfficial), 7,591 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConsciousHealthOfficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.