Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бизнес-модели и всё такое

Channel

Бизнес-модели и всё такое

@aktoclient

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

294subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001963831445
TypeChannel
Username@aktoclient
DescriptionПолезная информация и тренды для интересующихся бизнес-моделями + архив курсов в Вышке. По вопросам к @akarlov📲 или @Ekaterinnns
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/aktoclient

Growth

2947 Aug 2026, 10:22 — 294 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:15 — 294 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:228 Aug 2026, 08:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 293–295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:15294no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:22294first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 294 subscribers
Avg views / post
40.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held15 (27 January 202625 July 2026)
Views total40
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
216
Videos
31
Links
145

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54201074660776506401031.3%
🤔825.0%
618.8%
👏39.38%
🤯26.25%
🦄26.25%
🔥13.13%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

О том, как создатель BitTorrent пережил борьбу с пиратами, но не смог найти устойчивую бизнес-модель, читаем в конспекте vc.ru/story/3021454

🤔1custom 54201074660776506401

2 Jun 2026, 21:08 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всю бизнес-модель выстроили на алгоритме, который рассыпался перед вычислительными мощностями домашних ПК. В 1996 году киностудии утвердили защиту CSS для стандарта DVD. Причиной её уязвимости стала политика экспортного контроля США, запрещавшая ключи длиннее 40 бит. @aktoclient ⏹

custom 54201074660776506401

29 May 2026, 15:39 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В мае параллельно с 🟢🟢🟢 к нам в гости заглянула Юлия и Лариса из медиа и креативного агентства «❣️❣️❣️❣️❣️❣️❣️❣️@forumchanka_on_air! Отлично поговорили про бизнес-модель медиа и не только: https://t.me/forumchanka_on_air/1566 Скоро выложим подкаст или нейроверсию выступления🤝 и новые анонсы+отчеты клуба Деловые гипотезы 🔵⏹ @aktoclient ⏹

👏3

3 May 2026, 14:02 UTC169 viewsread 8 August 2026

💬 Дезинформация о брендах — это теперь бизнес-модель? Forbes разобрал тревожное исследование: инфлюенсеры распространяют ложь о компаниях значительно агрессивнее, чем обычные пользователи. И делают это не случайно. Помните TikTok-волну про Hermès, Louis Vuitton и Chanel? Тогда несколько блогеров выпустили вирусные ролики с «разоблачением»: мол, люксовые вещи тайно шьют в Китае, а этикетки «Made in France» — ложь. И

22 Apr 2026, 19:39 UTC157 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

новый термин - OaaS (Outcome as a Service) - бизнес-модель, где продается гарантированный измеримый результат. ссылку прислал Дмитрий Карандин ⚫️ @aktoclient ⏹

🤔1custom 54201074660776506401

15 Apr 2026, 10:45 UTC188 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бизнес-модели. Новые источники дохода Вопросы для обсуждения: Подписка, донаты, branded content, коммерция — что работает в 2026 году и почему? Как «упаковать» экспертизу в платный продукт? Кейсы успешных медийных образовательных проектов. Можно ли построить устойчивый бизнес на узкой нише? Каков порог входа? Транзакционные медиа: как платформа с пользовательским контентом превращает внимание в прямые продажи и стро

29 Mar 2026, 20:51 UTC268 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Эпоха “идей” закончилась. эпоха “делающих в одиночку с AI” началась. @aktoclient 🔟 ⏹ 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣

2🔥1custom 54201074660776506401

14 Mar 2026, 10:09 UTC213 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Корректный перевод понятия pivot от наших друзей из ДФВУ @academy_dvfu из Владивостока! Любая бизнес-модель это процесс поиска инсайда и proof of concept (да, мы терм на не все переводим), а не статика и новык/готовность быстро меняться едва ли не самый практичный навык. @aktoclient ⏹

🤔2custom 54201074660776506401

4 Mar 2026, 06:01 UTC220 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Бизнес-модель NVIDIA напоминает первого миллионера Калифорнии Сэмюэля Браннана, знаменитого торговца инструментами для золотоискателей, который жил в Сан-Франциско в середине ХІХ века» Из новой книги Стивена Витта «Мыслящие машины Дженсена Хуанга. История Nvidia и мировой ИИ-революции» Nvidia избрала бизнес-модель коммерческой доступности: микросем производили Европе, а сборкой, дистрибуцией и розничной продажей г

🦄21custom 54201074660776506401

2 Mar 2026, 15:38 UTC157 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Крупные рекламные холдинги, такие как WPP и Publicis, сталкиваются со скептицизмом инвесторов, несмотря на активное внедрение ИИ. Клиенты пока не видят обещанной экономии, а индустрия испытывает трудности с разработкой новой бизнес-модели для ИИ-ориентированного производства контента и медиазакупок. But whatever model wins, creative will be at the center of it — not as a production cost to be automated away but as t

🤔21custom 54201074660776506401

19 Feb 2026, 09:12 UTC167 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уолл-Стрит же заранее похоронил бизнес-модель Getty Images и подобных… Компании оцениваются в разы дешевле годовой выручки😨 @aktoclient 1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣ ⏹

custom 54201074660776506401

16 Feb 2026, 19:30 UTC183 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Есть идея сделать статью про сегментирование пользователей маркетплейсов на основе сексизма

  1. 🙂‍↕️! 🥳85%
  2. Может не надо?🥺4%
  3. 🤔12%
  4. 🫤12%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @aktoclient. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Feb 2026, 19:30 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Есть идея сделать статью про сегментирование пользователей маркетплейсов на основе сексизма

  1. 🙂‍↕️! 🥳85%
  2. Может не надо?🥺4%
  3. 🤔12%
  4. 🫤12%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бизнес-модели и всё такое” (@aktoclient), 294 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aktoclient.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.