Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ain

Channel

Ain

@ainreimusic

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

617subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002477713201
TypeChannel
Username@ainreimusic
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ainreimusic

Growth

6176196186 August 2026 — 619 subscribers6 August 2026 — 619 subscribers13 August 2026 — 617 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 617–619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:27617-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:34619no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:35619first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 617 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held17 (30 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,448
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52426310250408309212738.6%
custom 52922834540277568331927.1%
custom 53481815342622054601927.1%
custom 529448272209644208845.71%
custom 529218723387542741011.43%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Sub Urban - Time of My Life

custom 52426310250408309216

1 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC99 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

sound design ~ music for intro and outro Director: AR’9 🩸🐐

custom 53481815342622054607custom 52426310250408309214custom 52922834540277568332

31 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC233 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

История музыки и музыка как ремесло как никогда актуальны Это означает, что все эти «крутые новые штуки» (жанровые, саунд-дизайнерские, контекстуальные звукорежиссерские решения и новые подходы к крафту) нужно нанизывать на хорошо забытое старое и на его актуальное положение Под актуальным положением я подразумеваю то, что науки музыкальных дисциплин (многим из которых более 2х тысяч лет) - тоже не стоят на месте и

custom 52426310250408309218

30 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC153 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @richsabina138Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52426310250408309214

30 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC153 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @richsabina138

завтра

custom 53481815342622054604

25 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC290 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

mixed and mastered this beautiful body of work TESLA feat. @linx.cw LINX - Like A Boy (prod. by @prelest10000, @angelseason__) choreography @vot.mov video production @______salibi

custom 529228345402775683310

22 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC265 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дэниэл Левитин «На Музыке. Наука о человеческой одержимости звуком» Почти дочитал На наши предпочтения влияет баланс простоты и сложности в музыке. Исследования симпатий и антипатий в разных эстетических областях - живописи, поэзии, танце и музыке - показали упорядоченную связь между сложностью произведения и тем, насколько оно нам нравится. Конечно, сложность - понятие субъективное. Чтобы это обрело смысл, нужно д

custom 52426310250408309215custom 52922834540277568335custom 53481815342622054605

15 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC292 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @copilotbukakkePhoto

кто едет на аутлайн? мы готовим новую программу тесла вы уже слышали трек с linx впереди еще много фитов среди них готовы catu diosis, vmo, nttrl

custom 52944827220964420882custom 52921872338754274101custom 52922834540277568331

15 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC325 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @copilotbukakke

один из самых долгожданных коллабов будет с VMO один из самых ярких проектов прямо сейчас и ближайшего времени https://youtu.be/Fc2_G75VRZk?si=muIt9qjqRMAMwsuW

custom 52944827220964420882custom 52922834540277568331custom 53481815342622054601

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ainreimusic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 99,081 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ain” (@ainreimusic), 617 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ainreimusic.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.