Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

نشریه «عین»

@ainmag_ir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

193subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299295039
TypeChannel
Username@ainmag_ir
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ainmag_ir

Growth

1771931856 August 2026 — 177 subscribers8 August 2026 — 177 subscribers15 August 2026 — 193 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:24193+16
8 Aug 2026, 13:31177no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:22177first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 193 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.0
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held11 (23 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total286
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 29s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026

💠 بِسْمِ اللّٰهِ النُّورِ به سمت دریا فراخوان ارسال روایت از پیاده‌روی اربعین 🕯️ تصویر اربعین برای خیلی از ما، از جاده‌ها و عمودها شروع نمی‌شود؛ از همان لحظه‌ای آغاز می‌شود که یک شیء کوچک، یک مکث بی‌هوا در شلوغی موکب‌ها، یا یک صدای گنگ از دل ازدحام، یقهٔ حواسمان را می‌گیرد و ما را با خود می‌برد. اربعین فقط رفتن و رسیدن نیست؛ مجموعه‌ای از همین «آن»‌‌‌‌های نادیده است. از سینی چای خادمی که زبانی جز مهربانی نمی‌داند،

2 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026

💠 برشی کوتاه از«یادگاری را خودت انتخاب کن» نوشته‌ی «فاطمه نادری» ▫️«زشت نیست خودمون بگیم انگشتر می‌خوایم؟» زود جوابش را دادم که: «نه.» بعد از جوابم پشیمان شدم. کمی فکر کردم و گفتم: «نمی‌دونم، هم بگیم یادگاری می‌خوایم هم بگیم چی بده، انگار رفتیم بازار.» قرار شد فقط بنویسیم یک هدیه از سوی آقا برای تبرک می‌خواهیم. اما هر دو دعا کردیم ای کاش انگشتر باشد. ▪️خواهرم سرش را کمی کج کرد و با لبخند گفت: «اگه به تو انگشتر دادن

2 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026

#نما | رونمایی از شماره یازدهم نشریه «عین» | خون 🎙️شما صدای شهید مصباح‌الهدی باقری را می‌شنوید عین، قدردان نویسندگان عزیزی‌ست که با قلمشان، هم‌مسیر و همراه ما در روایت‌های این شماره بودند و «خون» روایتی از سوگ و حماسه آن‌ها است؛ 🖋️ #فاطمه‌سادات_آل_علی #مریم_ارسلانی #زهرا_افخمی #سجاد_امیدا #زهرا_باقری #دکتر_محمدامین_باقری #دکتر_مریم_برادران #محمدامین_بختیاری #علیرضا_بزم‌آرا #هانیه_پارسائیان #محدثه_حبیبی #زینب_خزایی

2 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026

#گزارش_تصویری بخش دوم 🔰 رونمایی از شماره یازدهم نشریه «عین» | خون | با محوریت «سوگ و حماسه» 🔸 پنج‌شنبه ۲۵ تیرماه، خانه شعر و ادبیات میزبان جمعی از اهالی فرهنگ و هنر بود که به مناسبت انتشار شماره یازدهم نشریه «عین» و گرامی‌داشت یاد سردبیر شهید این نشریه، گرد هم آمدند. 🔹سیدمحمدحسین حجازی، مدیرعامل شرکت نوسازی عباس‌آباد، علی درستکار، محمدامین باقری‌کنی، وحید یامین‌پور و محمدحسین پویانفر حضور داشتند و به ایراد سخن پرد

27 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#روایت_های_عینی کتاب‌خوانی از سر لج! ▪️از آن روز به خودم قول دادم که برای کم کردن روی این شخص هم که شده باید کتاب‌خوان شوم و بتوانم رکورد ایشان را بزنم. دیگر شب و روز من شده بود کتاب، به مادرم گفته بودم که می‌خواهم بعد از مدرسه به کتابخانه‌های عمومی بروم و مطالعه کنم؛ مادرم هم با رانندهٔ سرویسم صحبت کرده بود و هر روز قبل از بازگشت به خانه، به کتابخانه می‌رفتم و تا ساعت پایان آنجا بودم. 🖋️ فاطمه عدالت‌طلب ادامه مت

23 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC49 viewsread 8 August 2026

هر سفر رفیقی می‌خواهد که سختی‌های راه را برایمان قابل‌تحمل سازد. ارزش دوست چه‌بسا از خود مقصد هم بیشتر است. اربعین نیز به‌عنوان سفری معنوی، رفیقی هم‌جنس خود می‌طلبد؛ کسی که در ساعت‌های طولانیِ انتظار در اتوبوس‌های مهران و خسروی، در بی‌قراری‌ها و معطلی‌های پشت مرز و در خستگی‌های مسیر برگشت همراهی‌مان کند و به‌جای غرزدن از گرما و شلوغی، دلمان را مهیای دیدار کند. «عین» انتخاب خوبی برای این هم‌سفری است. «روایت سوگ و حم

23 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#روایت_های_عینی ابرِ سیاه، سیدِ بی‌گناه ▪️آن‌قدر شوت بودم که وقتی در دوران راهنمایی حوالی سال ۷۹ کنفرانس برلین برگزار شد و عده‌ای گستاخانه تویش مرگ بر مقامات جمهوری اسلامی سر دادند، صبحش برگشتم و توی مدرسه تعریف کردم. آمدم با هیجان بگویم: «وای خانم می‌گفتن مرگ بر…» که خانم پرورشی دستش را جلوی دهانم گرفت. این اولین مواجهه‌ام با حرمت این مقامات‌ بود. بعدترها موقع دبیرستان با کانون رهپویان وصال بُر خوردم و در دایره واژ

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ainmag_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 140,363 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نشریه «عین»” (@ainmag_ir), 193 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ainmag_ir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.