Друзья показали по Терри Прачетту схему, а я сделал такую со своими виртуальными друзьями по Азимову. Получилось классно:)
🔥6❤1

Channel
@ailoveandrobots
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
187subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002490630820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ailoveandrobots |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ailoveandrobots |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 187 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 185 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 185 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
92 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 43 | 46.7% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 29.3% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 20.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ailoveandrobots. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 December 2025 to 25 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья показали по Терри Прачетту схему, а я сделал такую со своими виртуальными друзьями по Азимову. Получилось классно:)
🔥6❤1
Интересная возможность выпускать своего Деймона:
🤖 Telegram добавили "guest bots" — теперь личного AI-ассистента можно вызвать в любой чат. С Bot API 10.0 (вышел 8 мая) бот не обязан быть участником чата, чтобы ответить. Достаточно @-упомянуть его в любом DM или группе — бот видит только то сообщение, в котором его позвали, отвечает один раз, и исчезает. Как гость. Несколько сценариев, где это полезно: - В чате с друзьями обсуждают фильм, никто не помнит режиссе…
🔥5❤2👍2
Радар Кравцова: картирование потенциала Александр Кравцов в книге «Персональная стратегия» предлагает методику, которая сначала кажется простой, а потом многое меняет. Я её встроил в Робби как отдельный модуль. В голове у меня раньше был линейный список: семья, друзья, работа, знакомые. Сорок-пятьдесят имён, размазанных по контактам и памяти. Кравцов предлагает разложить их по двум осям — и это не косметика, а друг…
🔥3❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Помните я писал о проблеме, что несмотря на все инструкции, скиллы и прочее, в каких бы местах они не были прошиты, CC всё равно ведёт себя волюнтаристски: когда хочет выполнить — делает, а не хочет — идёт по своему пути. Меня это не только страшно бесило, но и напрямую влияло и на качество работы, и на консистентность, и на предсказуемость, и на повторяемость (а, значит, масштабируемость). И за эту неделю мне удало…
❤1👍1
Взял тестировать и обновлять протоколы своего Робби (по сути своей личной ОС). Вроде работает. Буду наблюдать.
❤2👍1
От пирамиды к интеллекту: новые модели организационного дизайна Наткнулся на манифест Джека Дорси и Рольфа Ботхи (Sequoia) — «From Hierarchy to Intelligence». Дорси сам не простой человек: создал Twitter, построил Block (Square, Cash App) на $60B+ — и сейчас перестраивает свою компанию по принципиально другой модели. Стоит разобраться, что он имеет в виду. Небольшой экскурс. Организационные структуры, которыми мы п…
👍5🔥4
Память: MemPalace × llm-wiki × Robby Palace Одна из самых больных проблем работы с LLM — система не помнит, о чём мы говорили вчера. Каждая новая сессия — чистый лист. Я про это писал недавно — у меня 25 лет дневника, профили людей, логи менторских, финансовых и стратегических сессий, горизонт целей, здоровье. Всё это Робби должен знать, чтобы быть напарником, а не говорящим гуглом. Я конечно добавил в основную инст…
🔥6🤯1
Система спринтов и ревью в рамках менторской сессии В прошлом посте я показал архитектуру своей личной AI операционной системы. Сегодня — про то, как я с её помощью планирую год, отслеживаю прогресс и корректирую курс. За основу взял систему спринтов Катерины Ленгольд из книги «Просто космос». Если коротко: год разбивается на спринты по 9 недель. В каждом спринте — ровно 3 цели. Каждая цель разбита максимум на 3 по…
🔥6❤3
У меня давно была мечта —AI-компаньон из научной фантастики Не «окей гугл, поставь таймер». А напарник. Джой из «Бегущего по лезвию 2049» — с её способностью чувствовать контекст. Джарвис Тони Старка — с его мгновенным доступом ко всему и спокойной иронией. Целый набор ассистентов из «Врат» Фредерика Пола — каждый со своей специализацией. И Робби из «Астровитянки» Горькавого — верный, остроумный, энциклопедически об…
🔥10❤8👍2❤🔥1
Channel name was changed to «Homo Augmentus by Max Voloshin»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ailoveandrobots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 460,775 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Homo Augmentus by Max Voloshin” (@ailoveandrobots), 187 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ailoveandrobots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.