5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,096–3,203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 17:34
3,191
+6
10 Aug 2026, 00:42
3,185
+68
7 Aug 2026, 02:50
3,117
+9
6 Aug 2026, 04:51
3,108
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:04
3,108
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 3,191 subscribers
Avg views / post
764
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (26 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
6,880
Reactions total
82
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
129
76.8%
❤
36
21.4%
👎
2
1.19%
👏
1
0.595%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#أمثال #مجمع_الأمثال
➖ كَلاَبِسِ ثَوْبِىْ زُورٍ
• قال أبو الفضل الميداني النيسابوري (ت. ٥١٨ هـ):
قَال الأَصمَعي: إنه الرجل يلبس ثيابَ أهلِ الزهد، يريد بذلك الناس، ويظهر من التَّخَشُّع أكثَرَ مما في قلبه، وفي الحديث "المتشِّبع بما لا يملك كلابس ثَوْبِيْ زُورٍ" وهو الرجل يتكثَّر بما ليس عنده، كالرجل يرى أنه شَبِعَان وليس كذلك.
📗 [مجمع الأمثال (٣٠٧١)]
https://shamela.ws/book/12929/3155
https://t.me/ahlul_hadith
⚠️ هل يحكم على من وقع في الشرك أو الكفر بالظاهر أم بعد تحقق الشروط وانتفاء الموانع؟ للشيخ صالح الفوزان
https://youtube.com/shorts/oa7UHlZQ_Vk
═══ ¤❁✿❁¤ ═══
📌 قنوات النشر
● يوتيوب
https://youtube.com/@manhajalmamlaka?si=oBlTunIKBEnPBWzJ
● تلقرام:
https://t.me/udhrbiljahl1
#أئمة_السنة
▪️ قال الحافظ عثمان بن أبي شيبة (١٥٦ - ٢٣٩ هـ) رحمه الله:
فُسَّاقُ أصحابِ الحديثِ خيرٌ من عُبّادِ غيرهم.
📗 [ذم الكلام للهروي (٩٦)]
⬅️ #بعض_الفوائد:
• فيه الرد على سلطان العميري وأمثاله في زعمهم أن المبتدع قد يكون مقدمًا على السني.
- يقول العميري: (فالحكم على القائل لا ينظر فيه إلى جانب العقيدة فقط، وإنما ينظر فيه إلى مجمل حال القائل، فيما يتعلق بخدمته للإسلام وجهاده وبذله وعبادته.)
- ويقول أيضًا: (وا…
ذم الأشاعرة (٢٩)
⬅️ أزمة بعض المنتسبين إلى السلفية في جعل الأشاعرة من أهل السنة، بل من أئمتها: النووي نموذجًا
مما يُلاحظ في الساحة منذ سنتين أو أكثر؛ الجدالُ المستمر حول الفرقة الأشعرية ورموزها، كيحيى بن شرف النووي، وهل هو أشعريٌّ مبتدع، أم عالمٌ من علماء أهل السنة؟
والمتصدرون لهذا الجدال أطرافٌ عدة، لكني أركز على طرفٍ واحد، من أبرز المنتسبين إليه جماعةٌ من أهل مصر، كأبي عمر الباحث ومن معه.
👈 كانت بداية الأمر …
#هذا_رجل_سوء
⬅️ رجل سوء من لا يشهد الصلاة مع الجماعة
▪️ قال الحافظ إسحاق بن منصور الكوسج (١٧٠ - ٢٥١ ھ) رحمه الله:
"قلت لأحمد: رجل صحيح لا يشهد الجماعة؟
قال: هذا رجل ليس له علم، وأما مَن علم الحديث يتخلّف عن الجماعة، وقد قيل: (لا صلاة لجار المسجد إلا في المسجد.)
إنّ هذا الرجل رجل سوء".
📗 [مسائل الإمام أحمد بن حنبل وإسحاق بن راهويه - برواية إسحاق بن منصور المروزي المعروف ب #مسائل_الكوسج (٤٢٥)]
▪️ قال الحافظ #الذهبي…
⬅️ من آداب المشي في الطرقات
• قال أبو الحسن النهري لابن أبي يعلى:
"كنتُ في بعض الأيام أمشي مع القاضي والدك - أبي يعلى - فالتفتُّ فقال لي:
لا تلتفت إِذَا مشيتَ؛ فإنه يُنسب فاعل ذَلِكَ إلى الحمق".
📗 [#طبقات_الحنابلة (٣/ ٤١١)]
https://t.me/ahlul_hadith
• قال #الإمام_أحمد (١٦٤ - ٢٤١ هـ) رحمه الله:
"إظهارُ المِحْبَرة مِن الرِّياء".
📗 [مناقب الإمام أحمد (٢٦٧)]
⬅️ #بعض_الفوائد:
• أما اليوم فما ترك البعض أمرًا إلا وقد أظهره.
- فهذا يصور مكتبته ويتباهى بها.
• وهذا صور نفسه أمام الكعبة رافع الأيدي.
• والآخر يُظهر خشوعه بالبكاء أثناء صلاته، والكاميرا قبل وجهه.
👈 فينبغي عدمُ إظهارِ ما ليس فيه مَصلَحة راجِحة، كَتصوير الكُتب والمكتبات...
https://t.me/ahlul_hadith
ذم الأشاعرة (٢٨)
⬅️ هل الأشاعرة في الجملة من أهل السنة فيما وافقوا فيه الحق؟ أم هي فرقةٌ مبتدعة ضلّت ضلالًا عظيمًا في عدة مسائل كبار؟
لو قارنا بين أقوال الأئمة المتقدمين كأبي إسماعيل الهروي الذي نقل تكفيرَ الأشاعرة وأن هذا قول ١٠٠٠ عالم، وبين قول بعض المتأخرين الذين جعلوا الأشاعرة من أهل السنة في الجملة... نجد أن هناك بونًا شاسعًا بين هذين القولين.
👈 فما هي المسائل التي وافق فيها الأشاعرة أهلَ السنة، وما الذي ضلوا…
#تعظيم_السنة
⬅️ حجية أحاديث الآحاد (٣)
• قال الحافظ أبو المظفر السمعاني الشافعي (٤٢٦ - ٤٨٩ هـ) رحمه الله:
"فإن النبي ﷺ أدّى هذا الدين إلى الواحد فالواحد من أصحابه، ليؤدوه إلى الأمة، ونقلوا عنه، فإذا لم يقبل قول الراوي لأنه واحد رجع هذا العيب إلى المؤدي نعوذ بالله من هذا القول الشنيع والاعتقاد القبيح".
📗 [الحجة في بيان المحجة (٢/ ٢١٧)]
https://t.me/ahlul_hadith
⬅️ الموقف من أهل البدع
• قال الإمام عبيد الله #ابن_بطة العُكْبَري الحنبلي (٣٠٤ - ٣٨٧ ھ) رحمه الله:
"ومن السنة مجانبة كل من اعتقد شيئًا ممّا ذكرناه [أي: من البدع]، وهجرانه، والمقت له، وهجران من والاه، ونصره، وذب عنه، وصاحبه، وإن كان الفاعل لذلك يظهر السنّة".
📗 [#الإبانة_الكبرى (٢٨٢)]
https://t.me/ahlul_hadith
#تعظيم_السنة
⬅️ حجية أحاديث الآحاد (٢)
▪️ قال الإمام محمد بن إدريس #الشافعي (١٥٠ - ٢٠٤ هـ) رحمه الله:
"وإذا اتصل الحديث عن رسول الله ﷺ وصح الإسناد فيه فهو سنة".
📗 [يُنظر: "ذم الكلام" لأبي إسماعيل الهروي (١١٠٥)]
⬅️ #بعض_الفوائد:
• فالعبرة بصحة لإسناد فَحَسْب.
https://t.me/ahlul_hadith
👍6❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ahlul_hadith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 103,317 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أهْلُ السُّنَّةِ وَالْحَدِيث” (@ahlul_hadith), 3,191 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ahlul_hadith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.