Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

АГ про ИИ

@ag_igames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

285subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002169256977
TypeChannel
Username@ag_igames
Description@aglazovskiy пишет что-то про интеллектуальные игры
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ag_igames

Growth

2856 Aug 2026, 18:48 — 285 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 285 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:486 Aug 2026, 23:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 284–286 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:17285no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:48285first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
21
Links
51

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

330 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15045.5%
🔥7422.4%
👍4613.9%
😭185.45%
❤‍🔥175.15%
🏆92.73%
🤩61.82%
🌚41.21%
🤡20.606%
💯10.303%
🙏10.303%
🤔10.303%
🤗10.303%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 330reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ag_igames. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 February 2026 to 17 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC228 views67 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ЧР 2026 Что ж, начать надо с ретроспективы. В прошлом году было 50-52 место при 28 взятых. Если смотреть на весь сезон, у нас было несколько сильных игр, в том числе фестивальных, но было и много провальных. Где-то в начале июня я говорил, что сейчас Радиан+ по ощущениям в окрестности ТОП-20 ЧР, но это совсем не значит, что мы опять не будем бороться за 50-52 место. Накануне ЧР мы сгоняли несколько синхронов, вроде

45👍14❤‍🔥8

14 Jun 2026, 10:27 UTC318 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Какое-то безумие происходит. Мы играем плохо, роняем ответы, которые кажется нельзя уронить, но при этом не падаем в таблице.

🏆9🔥5

13 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTC373 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Первый день прошел в режиме выживания, мы в той части зала, где кондиционер только дразнит. В КСИ несколько написанных шальных сороковок стоили десятка мест, но и без них сыграли скорее хуже возможностей, пакет понравился. В вопросиках пока после двух туров 9-12 при неидеальной игре, тут сильно выше ожиданий и возможностей. В ЭК попали в сильную группу, а некоторые из нас последний раз играли в эту дисциплину до к

😭54👍4

13 Jun 2026, 07:00 UTC377 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

15🔥9🤩6

7 May 2026, 07:46 UTC517 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nesova

РАЗДАЁМ ПАКЕТЫ Пакеты тройки (почти 200 тем), КСИ (16 тем) и Интеллектуальное ассорти раздаём бесплатно для любых некоммерческих отыгрышей, если хотите их получить, напишите @aglazovskiy Enjoy!

🔥167

5 May 2026, 08:31 UTC≈2,470 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сводная таблица по всем зеркалам Нехрустальной совы (пока только вопросики) лежит тут. Всего сыграло 188 команд на 8 разных турнирах. Для разогрева... Самый легкий вопрос: номер 36 (мохавк) — 185 взятий Самые сложные: вопрос 27 (прекрасная леди), вопрос 85 (Wagner, Ring), вопрос 87 (слепое пятно) — по 7 взятий. Взятия по турам: 1570 — Александр Рождествин 1534 — Антон Саксонов 1406 — Алексей Богословский 1378 — Мак

🔥17

4 May 2026, 14:46 UTC581 views30 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сохраним для истории! Цена золота.

🔥13😭132🤡2

1 May 2026, 06:50 UTC647 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сейчас идёт СНГ по Героям III, за которым я совершенно не успеваю следить из-за того, что готовлю Нехрустальную сову. Подумалось, что сращивание цепочек в Героях прямо идеальная метафора фестиваля глазами организатора. Накануне надо подготовить план, затем кучу всего подготовить и поставить в правильных местах, во время феста следовать чётко по плану, любая ошибка в предварительной расстановке или реализации может за

14💯1🤗1

26 Apr 2026, 14:22 UTC671 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Надо, надо ввести новые формы сразу после того, как станут использовать «расстояние Левенштейна» и «расстояние Хэмминга» вместо всех этих непонятных «Отличается» / «Различается», ну невозможно играть же!

👍7🤔1

12 Apr 2026, 11:06 UTC821 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Закончил довольно объемный текст про 4 тур Совы бьян. Внутри немного внутренней кухни, технических моментов в отдельных вопросах и рефлексии. Надо сказать, что на написание меня отчасти вдохновили текст Наиля Фарукшина о пути одного из вопросов ОВСЧ, а также видео Александра Печеного с работой над ошибками тура ОСЧР. На случай, если вам будет лень проходить по ссылке или вы закроете его на середине, захайлайчу вот

26👍7🔥3

29 Mar 2026, 14:24 UTC723 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ещё немного переделал таблицу на 90 вопросов. Изменения (помимо описанных тут): - Переделал порядок столбцов на странице «Команды», чтобы стал как у турнирного сайта. - Добавил лист «О таблице». На ней версия таблицы, ссылка на гайд по использованию и ссылка на канал, в котором вы всё это читаете. - Немного отрефакторил кое-какие формулы (внешне ничего не должно поменяться). Enjoy!

12🔥2👍1

24 Mar 2026, 17:16 UTC662 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Переделал табличку фестивальную табличку на 90 вопросов на основе поступившего фидбека. - Добавил страницы туров. На них удобнее смотреть расплюсовку, а ещё видно не только какое место заняла команда в туре, но и импакт (видно на сколько мест команда поднялась/опустилась). - Переделал закреплённые столбцы, чтобы можно было удобнее смотреть на мобилках. Как это примерно выглядит, можно посмотреть тут (данные для наг

11👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ag_igames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 235,188 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АГ про ИИ” (@ag_igames), 285 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ag_igames.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.