Channel
@adnometer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003665720521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adnometer |
| Description | Пишу о том, как устроены международные рекламные агентства и глобальный маркетинг: люди, практики, рынки, инструменты, подходы, наблюдения. Что работает, что меняется — и какие выводы из этого сделать. Подробнее: |
| Created | 24 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adnometer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 53 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 53 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
30 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 53.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 10.0% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.33% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Одним из первых людей в глобальной медиа-индустрии, с которым я близко познакомился и общался на заре наших нетворкинг-туров — был Ли Харрис. Это был март 2013-го, третий наш проект: после Рима и Гонконга мы поехали в Нью-Йорк. И первая встреча у нас утром в понедельник была на радио WINS 1010, и принимал нас Ли собственной персоной. Значит, здесь вначале короткий оффтоп про то, кто такой Ли c сайта Radio Hall of …
❤2👍2🔥2🦄2💯1🕊1
Буквально неделю назад The Drum опубликовал совершенно потрясающий 20-минутный public talk замечательного Rory Sutherland'а, вице-президента Ogilvy & Mather (но вообще-то он куда больше, чем просто ad executive) — его свежие предсказания о "трендах 2026". Мы, к сожалению, с Рори не виделись лично — разминулись, когда были в Лондоне, хотя первоначально он должен был быть в числе тех, кто встречал нас в IPA (Institute…
❤4⚡2👍2
Я начинаю этот блог в марте 2026-го — (отличная идея на фоне блокировок телеграма, я считаю) — спустя 14 лет после нашего первого бизнес-тура в Италию в марту 2012-го. Я писал уже как-то о нем вот тут, вспоминая эту встречу, с которой и начался проект, но кажется так и не написал про главное, что меня поразило в агентстве. Это коридоры. Да, коридоры, которые были завешаны собственными работами в прямом смысле слов…
❤6🔥1🦄1
🙌 О канале [3/3] Кроме того, — международным маркетингом и постоянными экскурсиями по глобальным агентствам моя жизнь не исчерпывается. Поэтому у меня есть и «соседние» каналы про другие стороны моей работы и жизни: «Как продавать рекламу?» — мои 20 лет опыта продаж рекламных услуг и медийного инвентаря на локальных, региональных и федеральных рынках России: от Камчатки до Калининграда и от районной газеты до сете…
🙌 О канале [2/3] Да, важно сказать: Пишу в канал я лично сам — без ИИ, без штата редакторов, без контент-плана и без автоматических дайджестов-сборников-перепостов рандомных фактов якобы на злобу дня со всех каналов о маркетинге. Тут только личные впечатления, отклики и выводы о том, как устроены международные агентства и глобальный рынок рекламы и маркетинга. Да, конечно, иногда я могу сделать перепост какого-то…
❤2
🙌 О канале [1/3] Привет, я Рома Пивоваров (@romanpivovarov), основатель проекта @ADNOMADS — нетворкинг-путешествий для любопытных и неравнодушных владельцев рекламных агентств и медиа, которым интересен и важен опыт и практика коллег по всему миру. Как я их называю, для эдаких «рекламных странников», ad nomads, которые ходят, ездят, летают в гости друг к другу за тридевять земель. — Что я делаю? — Уже почти 15 ле…
❤2
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @adnometer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,045,520 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“576 агентств за 14 лет” (@adnometer), 53 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adnometer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.