Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Как продавать рекламу?

@admentors

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

855subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002112873414
TypeChannel
Username@admentors
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/admentors

Growth

854855854.58 Aug 2026, 08:31 — 854 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:21 — 855 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:319 Aug 2026, 01:21
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 854–855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:21855+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:31854first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 855 subscribers
Avg views / post
256
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (16 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,817
Reactions total44
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2659.1%
1022.7%
🔥818.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 11 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @admentors. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC124 views6 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Клиент говорит: — Сейчас никто ничего не покупает, люди экономят, какая уж тут реклама? Зачем мне рекламироваться? Вот вам еще пара аргументов от ЦБ :) для преодоления этого импульсивного возражения: 1. «Люди экономят всегда». На картинке выше видно, что люди экономят вообще всегда — и в растущие 2023-2024 и в текущие 2025-2026. Всё это бултыхается от 74% до 69% и смысла особого не имеет. Ваша фраза может быть

👍6

Signed Роман Пивоваров

5 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC140 views2 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Оттуда же, что и предыдущий пост. Как говорится, — это всё, что нужно знать об «уровне знания бренда» как маркетинговой метрике. Хорошо показывать картинку в ответ на рекламодателевское: «Ну-у-у, меня и так все знают...»: — Иван Иваныч, треть населения вообще не в курсе о существовании Центробанка! Причем народ еще регулярно забывает о них, как только они из новостной повестки выпадают. Смотрите, что после этих но

👍2

Signed Роман Пивоваров

5 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC160 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Копаюсь сегодня утром тут в статистике ЦБ о потребительских настроениях — это я так готовлюсь к осенним бизнес-форумам и завтракам для ваших рекламодателей, надо же мне им рассказывать, почему надо рекламироваться... )) И, короче говоря, нашел вот такую полезную для нас с вами картинку. Данные отсюда и отсюда. Тут примечателен рост готовности людей тратить на крупные покупки — не от хорошей жизни, а из опасения, чт

👍4

Signed Роман Пивоваров

29 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC253 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Мы с Тамарой ходим парой» или Как эволюционируют телеграм-боты? Я даже повелся на минутку... :) Теперь для поддержания правдоподобия картинки подлизывающийся Ксюшин бот-одобрямс ходит в комменты к постам не один, а втроем. Первый комментирует, второй-третий ставят лайки и реакции. Ну, типа, классно ты откомментировал, старик. ваще, огонь, лав, бомба, 100%! Внимание привлекается, легитимность нарастает. На скрина

5

Signed Роман Пивоваров

28 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC281 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неплохая ситуативочка :)

👍9

Signed Роман Пивоваров

24 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC340 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нас на летнем интенсиве будет уже 70 (!). Вчера провел короткую установочную оргвстречу перед запуском курса в следующий вторник, 28 июля. Если думали присоединиться — решайтесь. Заточим за август свою продажную пилу, чтобы встретить все реалии осеннего рекламно-медийного рынка во всеоружии :) 👉 https://summer.adconsult.ru/quick — ☉ — Что это за курс? — 4 недели живых онлайн-занятий — 8 встреч по продажам рекла

1

Signed Роман Пивоваров

23 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC336 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наткнулся тут на 2 слайда своих старых. Сейчас готовлюсь к летнему интенсиву своему, разбираю прошлые презенташки, пересобираю логику рекламных продаж и ищу, скажем так, неустаревшие мысли... Мне кажется, тут удачно сформулирован принцип «разграничения ответственности» с клиентом. Я когда продаю рекламные интеграции какие-то, обязательно с клиентом, пусть на салфетке, но какие-то такие вещи обсуждаю и прописываю.

🔥73

Signed Роман Пивоваров

21 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTC247 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, ко мне тут на летний предсезонный интенсив продаж рекламы записалось уже 50+ участников из нас с вами. Не буду говорить "осталось мало мест", потому что курс идет онлайн, и мест почти бесконечное количество (ну, кроме формата "С практикой", там ограничение есть). Но скажу, что осенью повторять курс не буду точно, потому что календарь нетворкинг-туров дикий, и времени точно не будет. Так что если есть желан

Signed Роман Пивоваров

16 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC359 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так! Дорогие продавцы телека! Держите вам главный слайд лета :) Paid ads в инсте и трубе (условно) нету, поэтому сразу говорите, что справедливая цена на 1 показ тв-ролика = х26 CPM обычного вашего баннера, Иван Иваныч. То есть, если CPM в РСЯ, скажем, при ваших таргетах, это 300р, то ТВшный CPM может быть аж 7800р. По эффекту воздействия будет одинаково — 1 ваш ролик, увиденный 1 раз = 1 ваш баннер, увиденный 2

🔥1

Signed Роман Пивоваров

16 Jul 2026, 11:30 UTC286 viewsread 8 August 2026

Короче, я понял: У всех настолько мощно прут продаж рекламного инвентаря, что нет даже свободной минутки, чтобы поныть мне в комментах о том, как всё плохо.

Signed Роман Пивоваров

16 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC291 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kaktamromaPhoto

Так, «мемуары о Якутске» чуть откладываются, — пока летел 7 часов наваял лонгрид, и его надо резать и сокращать в три раза )). Зато сегодня я тут сижу на конференции RoRe Group (чукча ещё и читатель!), — и я тут наконец-то начинаю чувствовать, что рынок всерьёз разворачивается назад к смыслам, любви и неподотчетному брендингу от всего этого многолетнего и безусловного торжества перформанс-отчетов. Ну слава богу. На

👍51

Signed Роман Пивоваров

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @admentors. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 414,029 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Как продавать рекламу?” (@admentors), 855 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/admentors.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.