المجلس رقم 37 من سلسلة الخلافة -بين الوحي والواقع والآماني- ⭐️️️️️️️⭐️خلاف العلماء في تكفير الخوارج ⭐️️️️️️️⭐️ ️️️️️️ لفضيلة الشيخ المفسر/ عادل السيد -حفظه الله ورعاه- https://youtu.be/jNDE57WkoC0?si=uy9bDoxepqgegR6A

Channel
قناة فضيلة الشيخ عادل السيد حفظه الله
@adelelsayd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,851subscribers
+118 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001006269322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @adelelsayd |
| Description | ننشر المحاضرات المتجددة لفضيلة الشيخ عادل السيد حفظه الله |
| Created | 30 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/adelelsayd |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 15:16 | 13,851 | +5 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 13,846 | +12 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:11 | 13,834 | -4 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:10 | 13,838 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:59 | 13,841 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:05 | 13,842 | +8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 05:47 | 13,834 | +5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:57 | 13,829 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:28 | 13,838 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 13,840 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:50 | 13,838 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 13,834 | +6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:35 | 13,828 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 13,832 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 13,829 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 13,824 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:10 | 13,817 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 13,814 | +4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 13,810 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:58 | 13,802 | first reading |
Engagement
170 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.79%
- avg views ÷ 13,851 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 941
- 41 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.483%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 61
- of 170 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 170 (31 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 38,586 |
| Reactions total | 156 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈811
- Videos
- ≈197
- Links
- ≈2,520
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 06s
- Average length
- 2m 03s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
577 reactions across 87 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 343 | 59.4% | |
| 👍 | 219 | 38.0% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.693% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.347% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.347% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.173% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 577 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 61 posts held from the last 30 days (6.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
File, posted without a caption
المجلس رقم 37 من سلسلة الخلافة -بين الوحي والواقع والآماني- ⭐️️️️️️️⭐️خلاف العلماء في تكفير الخوارج ⭐️️️️️️️⭐️ ️️️️️️ لفضيلة الشيخ المفسر/ عادل السيد -حفظه الله ورعاه- 🎤 رابط الاستماع المباشر والتحميل بصيغة MP3 (جودة عالية الدقة) مباشرة من موقع فضيلة الشيخ: https://www.adelelsayd.com/media/5101 🎤وإليكم الصوتيه بجودة مخفضة للاستماع المباشر 👇👇👇
❤2
Live stream finished (1 hour)
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
https://www.youtube.com/live/NPCxsD2vPOw?si=43zjedBqUULwYiXc
Live stream started
شبه المنكرين للمعاد والرد عليها بالبراهين من القرآن #الشيخ_عادل_السيد #مجالس_العلم #كتاب_الفوائد https://youtu.be/JpfevUuVGMg?si=kiqyGa3mJR1Aq4fZ
ما الذي جاء ببني إسرائيل إلى جزيرة العرب وماذا فعلوا بها؟ #الشيخ_عادل_السيد #مجالس_العلم https://youtu.be/ePHDJXSLlxY?si=xxj7VCvWHk2bD3tn
سلسلة شرح كتاب القول المفيد على كتاب التوحيد: ✅ المجلس رقم 192 🕌 باب ما جاء في النهي عن سب الرياح ⭐️️️️️️ لفضيلة الشيخ المفسر / عادل السيد -وفقه الله وسدد خطاه - https://youtu.be/BeHDxVNy6Ks?si=vzN9zOruqhfAT3SI
❤3
File, posted without a caption
❤3👍3
📚سلسلة شرح كتاب القول المفيد على كتاب التوحيد: ✅ المجلس رقم 192 🕌 باب ما جاء في النهي عن سب الرياح ⭐️️️️️️ لفضيلة الشيخ المفسر / عادل السيد -وفقه الله وسدد خطاه - 🎤 رابط الاستماع المباشر والتحميل بصيغة MP3 (جودة عالية الدقة): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Sxt-4VqZuLgRlqdJywsVbDg0702CeDWR/view?usp=sharing 🌐 لمشاهدة المجلس بجودة HD من خلال الرابط https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19fkBGqAUr/ 🎤…
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @adelelsayd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@fawayd_maktouba_adelassayd · 43813 postsالعيش بين كتب العقيدة نعيم لا ينقضي
@al3aych · 2,7272 postsمنهاج السنة
@PlatformSunnah · 3581 postالسنة سفينة نوح
@SonahSafinatNoah · 7,8551 post💎تـَــأمـُلَاتٌ فِـﮯ ڪِــتـَــ📖ـــابِ الـلِّـهِ ✺ لِعـُــلـَماءِ السـُّـنّــة
@Tamolat79 · 1,6441 postصَـلاحُ الأمَّـة من صَـلاحكِ!🌱
@ta3lematfalena · 2421 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rslancom · 29,838
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
@aqedamenhag · 66,401
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
@alfaq_almoyassr · 20,168
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 September 2026
@ahmed19871111 · 28,032
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@alrsalaa1 · 76,316
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@adeiat_adhkar · 46,371
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
@ahadeethahkam · 49,297
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
@mtoon_altawheed · 120,746
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
@alsseerah · 116,179
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
@aemal_alqulub · 63,065
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
@ahadeethahkam2 · 32,419
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@Alashbal1 · 76,549
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
@Sualruhaily · 63,257
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
@husary055 · 25,845
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
@albadr9 · 31,544
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
@adab_akhlaq · 47,541
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@mtoon_aqeeda · 36,300
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
@mtoon2 · 79,556
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
@sohaymi · 34,572
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
@mohaymid · 24,167
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 September 2026
@shama2lalnabe · 27,964
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@elbadr12 · 34,008
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
@aadab6 · 26,451
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
@altwohed3 · 74,700
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة فضيلة الشيخ عادل السيد حفظه الله” (@adelelsayd), 13,851 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adelelsayd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.