Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Academia Kashmiriyyah

Channel

Academia Kashmiriyyah

@academiakashmiriyyah

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

219subscribers

+106 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004307007381
TypeChannel
Username@academiakashmiriyyah
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 29 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/academiakashmiriyyah

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11321916611 August 2026 — 113 subscribers11 August 2026 — 113 subscribers17 August 2026 — 139 subscribers25 August 2026 — 173 subscribers1 September 2026 — 205 subscribers11 September 2026 — 219 subscribers11 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 03:39219+14
1 Sept 2026, 18:23205+32
25 Aug 2026, 02:47173+34
17 Aug 2026, 16:57139+26
11 Aug 2026, 00:30113no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:16113first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12992.8%
👍75.04%
🥰21.44%
💅10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC54 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

”There is no ijma’ on what ijma’ is” The mainstream Sunni usuliyin broadly accepted ijma as an authoritative proof. But once they tried to define exactly what ijma is, who participates in it, how agreement is established, when it becomes binding, and how we know it actually occurred, major disagreements appeared. Even the definitions differ. Ibn Qudamah defines ijma as: ومعنى الإجماع في الشرع اتفاق علماء العصر من

9👍1

6 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC224 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

❝Five books which, if you devote yourself to them, will benefit you greatly in understanding the principles of the Shari'ah, its foundations, its rulings and its objectives, and will give you a strong ability to properly understand what comes from Allah and His Messenger ﷺ: - al-Risalah by al-Shafi'i - al-Qawa'id al-Nuraniyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah - I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in by Ibn al-Qayyim - al-Muwafaqat by al-Shatibi - al-

11

4 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

The Methodology of Imam Ibn Hazm in Hadith Criticism The following points summarise the defining features of Imam Ibn Hazm's methodology in taʿlil al-ahadith (identifying defects in hadith), based on the inductive study of Badr al-ʿUmrani al-Tanji and as presented by Sh. Mahir ibn Yasin al-Fahl. They also provide a useful overview of how Ibn Hazm's approach compares with the broader methodology of the Andalusian and

5

4 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Classical Islamic Scholarship on Hadiths and Reports that Contradict Reason Imam al-Khatib al-Baghdadi (d. 463 AH) said: وَلَا يُقْبَلُ خَبَرُ الْوَاحِدِ فِي مُنَافَاةِ حُكْمِ الْعَقْلِ، وَحُكْمِ الْقُرْآنِ الثَّابِتِ الْمُحْكَمِ، وَالسُّنَّةِ الْمَعْلُومَةِ، وَالْفِعْلِ الْجَارِي مَجْرَى السُّنَّةِ، وَكُلِّ دَلِيلٍ مَقْطُوعٍ بِهِ، وَإِنَّمَا يُقْبَلُ بِهِ فِيمَا لَا يُقْطَعُ بِهِ، مِمَّا يَجُوزُ وُرُودُ التَّعَبُّد

4

3 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC106 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

One thing that stood out is that the whole mutawatir vs ahad framework doesn't seem to have originally come from the hadith scholars themselves. And any critical thinking and advances student of hadith would also reach such a conclusion. Sh. Suheil Laher argues that the concept of tawatur was likely taken up by the Arabic philosophers, probably through the Greek empiricists, either directly or via the Mu'tazilah. At

7

3 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC118 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ease Is a Foundational Principle of Sacred Law ❝Ease (taysir) is one of the foundational principles of the Shari'ah. For example, when we say that the basic principle in mu'amalat is permission, this is one of the greatest manifestations of ease. Any new transaction—whether economic, administrative, political, or otherwise—is presumed to be permissible. We do not need a specific Shar'i text to establish its permiss

5

2 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC106 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Imam Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "الرسل صلوات الله وسلامه عليهم لم يخبروا بما تحيله العقول وتقطع باستحالته ، بل أخبارهم قسمان: أحدهما : ما تشهد به العقول والفطر . الثاني: ما لا تدركه العقول بمجردها ، كالغيوب التي أخبروا بها عن تفاصيل البرزخ واليوم الآخر وتفاصيل الثواب والعقاب ، ولا يكون خبرهم محالا في العقول أصلا ، وكل خبر يظن أن العقل يحيله ، فلا يخلو من أحد أمرين : إما أن يكون الخ

6

2 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC127 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Sh. Ahmad Ma'bad Abdul Karim - The Science of 'Ilal al-Hadith: A Means of Protecting the Sunnah or a Door to Doubt? (Personal Notes) https://youtu.be/jjOE2DeP3Rs?si=qhYzRLmwPpUU5RLw Introduction to the Science of 'Ilal (0:00 - 5:53) The moderator introduces 'Ilal al-Hadith (finding the hidden defects of hadith) as one of the most advanced sciences of hadith. It investigates hidden reasons that affect whether a hadit

4👍1

1 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC107 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Why Didn't Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn al-Qayyim Write a Book on Usul al-Fiqh? ❝There is a particular approach that I want to discuss, namely the approach of critical analysis and revision (naqd and tashih). The leading figures of this approach are Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and his student Ibn al-Qayyim. Neither Ibn Taymiyyah nor Ibn al-Qayyim wrote a dedicated book on Usul al-Fiqh. As for al-Musawwadah, Ibn Taymiyy

5

31 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

That project served an important purpose. It gave students a curriculum, muftis a dependable framework and judges a practical reference point. The later codification answered real institutional needs. At the same time, practical codification shouldn't be confused with the complete intellectual history of the school. - The later manuals generally tell us what the madhhab settled upon. - The earlier literature often

4

31 Jul 2026, 18:41 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Reflections on Reducing the Hanbali Madhhab to Its Later Mu'tamad I was genuinely pleased to have come across that previous section or clip from Sh. Yusuf al-Ghafis's lesson in al-Masjid al-Nabawi. It touched on something I've been thinking about for quite a while. Many students today seem to encounter the Hanbali madhhab almost entirely through its later codification. The school becomes al-Iqna, Muntaha al-Iradat,

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @academiakashmiriyyah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Academia Kashmiriyyah” (@academiakashmiriyyah), 219 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academiakashmiriyyah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.