Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пользы-Абу Хьузайфа

Channel

Пользы-Абу Хьузайфа

@abuhuzayfa_2024

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,717subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001590783651
TypeChannel
Username@abuhuzayfa_2024
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/abuhuzayfa_2024

Growth

1,7171,7221,719.56 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,719 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,722 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,721 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,716–1,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:261,717-4
12 Aug 2026, 09:221,721-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:311,722+3
7 Aug 2026, 01:351,719+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:471,718first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.7%
avg views ÷ 1,717 subscribers
Avg views / post
510
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,020
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
1m 46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

298 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15351.3%
custom 58752503086904825669531.9%
custom 58911252121911347844615.4%
😢41.34%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC245 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Является ли Коран исцелением для болезней тела? Да, без всякого сомнения. Об этом прямо сказано в Коране. Всевышний Аллах сказал: «И Мы ниспосылаем из Корана то, что является исцелением и милостью для верующих». (Коран, 17:82) Таким образом, Коран является исцелением: для духовных болезней сердца; и для телесных болезней. Однако для исцеления посредством Корана есть условие. О нём сказал Ибн Раджаб: «Заклина

12

23 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC775 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Владелец этого аккаунта покинул этот мир. Если бы такой статус появился у твоего брата, с которым ты когда-то повздорил и от которого отвернулся, представь, сколько сожаления и боли из-за упущенного времени ты бы почувствовал. Поэтому старайся сохранять хорошие отношения со своими братьями. Ведь пока между вами есть непонимание, может случиться так, что однажды его не станет. И тогда эта боль и сожаление могут оста

custom 58911252121911347842618😢3

18 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC822 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сказал Ибн аль-Каййим, да помилует его Аллах: «К числу недействительных уловок относится следующее: если человек насильно присвоил (гасб) у кого-то еду, а затем захотел освободиться от ответственности за неё, не сообщая владельцу об этом, то [говорят ему]: пусть пригласит его к себе домой и подаст ему эту самую еду — и когда тот её съест, присвоивший освобождается от ответственности. Однако эта уловка недействитель

9custom 58752503086904825662custom 58911252121911347842

17 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC787 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

10custom 58752503086904825663custom 58911252121911347841

15 Jul 2026, 02:21 UTC667 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

18custom 58911252121911347842

14 Jul 2026, 00:18 UTC≈3,950 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

▪️ Сказал Шайх АбдуЛлах аль-Фавзан : В нашу эпоху ростовщичество (риба) получило широкое распространение, и операции с ним стали обычным явлением во многих банках и других учреждениях. Передается со слабым иснадом (цепочкой передатчиков) хадис от Абу Хурайры о том, что Посланник Аллаха ◽️ сказал: «Наступят для людей такие времена, когда они будут потреблять риба». (Передатчик) сказал: «Его спросили: "Все люди?"» Он

7custom 58911252121911347845

11 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC594 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alharameyn

🔥 РЕКОМЕНДУЕМ К ПРОСМОТРУ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWTDi-LAOAc

3custom 58752503086904825662

10 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC745 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Табиины дошли и до Франци . Есть у нас и другое известие, подтверждающее отправку отрядов за аль-Бурт (Пиренеи). Источники сообщают о Хиббане ибн Аби Джабале (ум. ок. 122 г. х. = 739 г.) — одном из таби’инов, вошедших в аль-Андалус вместе с Мусой, — что он участвовал во взятии Каркашуны (Каркассона) на юге Франции: «Хиббан ибн Аби Джабаля ходил в поход с Мусой ибн Нусайром, когда тот завоёвывал аль-Андалус, и дошёл

4custom 58911252121911347841

8 Jul 2026, 05:23 UTC773 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Стыдливость

custom 587525030869048256611

4 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC675 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @favaidizknigFile

📖 Книга Ибн Аби ад-Дуньи «О семье» Важная книга, в которой имам приводит хадисы и асары на разные темы. В книге 34 глав. ❕Если найдете ошибку, просьба написать об этом в сообщения канала.

4custom 58752503086904825661custom 58911252121911347841

2 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC845 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💭 Сказал шейх Абу Джафар ‘Абдуллах аль-Хулайфи в «Шарх Муснад ад-Дарими» — да помилует его Аллах: «Если тому, кому Аллах желает блага, Он даёт понимание религии» то почему же ищущие знания завидуют тем, кто последовал за мирским? К сожалению, многие требующие знания смотрят на тех, кто последовал за мирским, с вожделением и устремлённостью, будто они упустили величайшее благо. О ищущий знания! Разве дошло до тебя

7

2 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC606 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚪️⚪️⚪️ Его — да помилует его Аллах — спросили о человеке, который совершил омовение и встал на молитву, а затем во время молитвы ощутил каплю: становится ли его молитва недействительной или нет? ⚪️⚪️⚪️ Он (Ибн Таймия ) ответил: Само по себе ощущение не нарушает омовения, и не дозволено выходить из обязательной молитвы из-за одного лишь сомнения. Ведь достоверно передано, что Пророка — да благословит его Аллах и п

7custom 58752503086904825666

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abuhuzayfa_2024. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 170,942 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пользы-Абу Хьузайфа” (@abuhuzayfa_2024), 1,717 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abuhuzayfa_2024.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.