Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

A/B Testicles

@abtesticles

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

641subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002629850739
TypeChannel
Username@abtesticles
DescriptionПодписывайтесь, только если вы в контрольной группе
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/abtesticles

Growth

6417 Aug 2026, 16:48 — 641 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:48 — 641 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:488 Aug 2026, 02:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 640–642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:48641no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:48641first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 17 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
1
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾19866.2%
4414.7%
custom 53706108670941666174113.7%
custom 5222091134221695952165.35%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jun 2026, 19:38 UTC518 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Джереми Кларксон осваивает бутстрэп https://rutube.ru/video/9b458f07826786d9def20840a7496570/?t=1360&r=plwd

👾7

8 Jun 2026, 07:55 UTC995 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пост-коллаба вообще со всеми Сережа написал хорошее резюме по стратификации и ее уродливой сестричке рерандомизации. Почитайте, чтобы понимать, о чем речь. На ахе, кстати, про рерандомизацию рассказывал Ян Пиле из Магнита. И у него на слайде распределение p-value с рерандомизацией при H0 было равномерным, а не скошенным влево, как можно было бы ожидать. Я подошел спросил а че это. Он сказал, что если к рерандомизац

👾18

26 May 2026, 16:56 UTC759 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Гипотезы Статистические критерии устроены таким образом, что они позволяют контролировать вероятность ошибки первого рода. Контролю альфы в принципе уделяется очень много времени в статистике. Например, когда речь заходит о подглядывании или о множественных сравнениях. Оно и неудивительно – ведь для нас очень важно случайно не выкатить изменение, которое на самом деле никак не повлияло на метрики. Или не прям важно?

👾10

21 Apr 2026, 07:09 UTC951 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой критический обзор на дизайн байерско-селлерского теста Авито Там предлагается провести A/B-тест как на картинке. Что мне не понравилось: 1) Мне было сложно разобраться, чуть мозги не сломал 2) Меня покорежило от определения MDE 3) Никак не учитывается сетевой эффект при сравнении покупательского контроля и покупательского теста. Если мы скрываем плохих продавцов в покупательском тесте, то все покупатели из по

👾13

29 Mar 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,040 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Может ли одна метрика быть чувствительнее другой Была бы у меня возможность – я бы только на деньги в A/B-тестах и смотрел. К сожалению, ARPU – не самая чувствительная метрика. Обычно осознание этого факта приводит к каким-то таким рассуждениям: 🤗 Мы хотим с достаточной уверенностью фиксировать эффект 2% ✍️ Выручка для этого ну ни в каком виде не годится – получаем мощность всего 50% 💅 Возьмем тогда конверсию в з

👾13

20 Feb 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,100 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Единица рандомизации

  1. Покупатель29%
  2. Продавец11%
  3. Объявление60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👾3

20 Feb 2026, 08:22 UTC≈1,090 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кейс с собеседования Года полтора назад на собесе в Авито мне дали такой кейс: Тестируем фичу, которая с помощью AI улучшает фотографии в объявлениях Допустим, сетевой эффект ничтожен – дизайним стандартный A/B-тест. Какую единицу рандомизации лучше выбрать? Почему её, а не другую? Напишите в комментах – интересно послушать мнения

👾8

16 Feb 2026, 09:33 UTC≈1,220 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Подборка вакансий по A/B Для тех, кто больше никогда не хочет делать выгрузки, чтобы узнать, а какая же доля пользователей долистала до 8-го товара в выдаче Вакансии, где нужно пилить A/B-платформу ◆ Lamoda ◆ Островок ◆ Ozon – но тут ищут продакта Вакансии, где нужно говорить другим, как правильно проводить A/B-тесты ◆ Вкусвилл ◆ Uzum ◆ Точка На похожую вакансию в Точку я, кстати, когда-то откликался. В ответ на

👾18

14 Feb 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,050 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

День всех влюбленных 🩷 Я написал статью по случаю. Скидывайте её вместе с валентинками своим вторым половинкам, партнерам, k-ближайшим соседям. Думаю, это будет замечательным подарком в такой светлый день Если некому скинуть, то мб стоит поменьше увлекаться статистикой, не знаю.. Про отношения 👩‍❤️‍💋‍👨

custom 522209113422169595216

27 Jan 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,140 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я стал A/B-селебой Канал попал в подборку от NewHR – самый последний во вкладке "Аналитика". Скорее всего, потому что я сам же его и упомянул, когда проходил опрос. Приятно получить всеобщее признание

👾30

26 Dec 2025, 10:22 UTC≈1,350 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ChatGPT подвел мои итоги года и сделал новогоднее видео (он меня ненавидит)

20

25 Dec 2025, 14:37 UTC≈1,440 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как честно подвести итоги A/B-теста Я не писал в канал больше месяца, потому что дома появился плэйстейшн, и теперь моя сфера интересов – видеоигры, а не A/B-тесты. Но скоро Новый год, а значит многие команды будут подводить итоги своей работы. И мне очень некомфортно от мысли, что они могут делать это неправильно, совершенно не осозновая этого. Очень надеюсь, что вызвал у вас FOMO, и, что вы прочитаете мою новую с

24

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @abtesticles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Feb 2026, 08:22 UTCAnonymous Poll197 voters

Единица рандомизации

  1. Покупатель29%
  2. Продавец11%
  3. Объявление60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 24 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 952,327 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“A/B Testicles” (@abtesticles), 641 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abtesticles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.