Channel
@abdulsaheb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
529subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001025581275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @abdulsaheb |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/abdulsaheb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 529 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 530 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 530 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
146 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2024 to 5 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
معنى #رفع_القلم في روايات أهل البيت عليهم السلام روى الشيخ الصدوق رضي الله عنه قال: حدثنا أبو الحسن محمد بن عمرو بن علي البصري قال: حدثنا أبو الحسن صالح بن شعيب الغرياني من قرى الغازيات قال: حدثنا زيد بن محمد البغدادي قال: حدثنا علي بن أحمد العسكري قال: حدثنا عبد الله بن داود بن قبيصة الانصاري عن موسى بن علي القرشي ، عن أبي الحسن الرضا عليه السلام قال: «رُفِعَ القَلَمُ عَن شِيعَتِنَا» فقلت: يا سيدي كيف ذاك؟ قال: «لا…
❤9
أسعد الله أيامكم
❤17
سلام علیکم. سید نظر شما در مورد این پیام چیست؟ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ #ایام_محسنیه #راحت_باور_نکنید 💢این حدیث صحت و سندیت دارد؟ نخستین کسی که درباره او محکمه عدل در حکومت حقّه تشکیل می شود، محسن فاطمه است بحارالانوار: ج 28، ص 64 برررسی سلسله روایان_سند👇👇 ✅عبارت عربی َ أَوَّلُ مَنْ يُحْكَمُ فِيهِ مُحَسِّنُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ ع فِي قَاتِلِه در سلسله روایان این #حدیث یک کذاب حضور دارد به نام «ْ عَبْد…
❤9
#پاسخ_شبهه 📽آیا در #قرآن آیهای که بر #لیلة_المبیت اشاره کند نداریم؟ 👈 #عقیل_هاشمی کارشناس #شبکه_وهابی_کلمه میگوید: هیچ دلیلی نداریم که آیهی ۲۰۷ سوره بقره اختصاصی به #امیرالمؤمنین علیهالسلام داشته باشد و اینکه واقعه #لیله_المبیت در مکه بوده و این آیه در مدینه نازل شده بنابراین این آیه ربطی به لیلة المبیت ندارد! #سید_عبدالصاحب_هاشمی #شبکه_جهانی_ولایت #لیله_المبیت @hagigatshia14 @velayattv @abdulsaheb
❤8
Posted without readable text
❤1
البانی محدث بزرگ وهابیت : روزه روز عاشورا بدعت بني امیه و قاتلان امام حسین علیه السلام است @abdulsaheb
❤7
Posted without readable text
#ویدئو 🎥 « علی میتواند… » #عید_غدیر #دهه_ولایت #حاج_احمد_واعظی @hajahmadvaezi1
❤4
الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِی جَعَلَنَا مِنَ الْمُتَمَسِّکِینَ بِوِلاَیَهِ أَمِیرِ الْمُؤْمِنِینَ وَ الْأَئِمَّهِ عَلَیْهِمُ السَّلاَمُ
❤12
*دعا برای فرج و رهایی اهل بیت علیهم السلام در روز عید غدیر* وَ مِنَ اَلدَّعَوَاتِ فِي يَوْمِ اَلْغَدِيرِ مَا رَوَيْنَاهُ بِإِسْنَادِنَا عَنِ اَلشَّيْخِ اَلْمُفِيدِ رِضْوَانُ اَللَّهِ عَلَيْهِ: اَللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ بِحَقِّ مُحَمَّدٍ نَبِيِّكَ وَ عَلِيٍّ وَلِيِّكَ وَ اَلشَّأْنِ وَ اَلْقَدْرِ اَلَّذِي خَصَصْتَهُمَا بِهِ دُونَ خَلْقِكَ أَنْ تُصَلِّيَ عَلَی مُحَمَّدٍ وَ عَلِيٍّ وَ أَنْ تَبْدَأَ بِهِمَا فِي كُلّ…
❤6
#برش_کوتاه 🎥 فرمایشات حضرت آیت الله میلانی مد ظله العالی در دیدار مسئولین هیئات مذهبی 🗓 سه شنبه ۹ اردیبهشت 🆔️ @ayatollahalimilani
❤7
آیا اهل بیت (ع) نماز تراویح میخواندند؟! 🤔🔥 🚨📢 یک پاسخ کوبنده به شبهه جدید عقیل بیعقل! 🚨📢 🧐 عقیل بی عقل مدعی شده که اهل بیت (ع) نماز تراویح میخواندند، اما فقط اسمش فرق میکرده و به عنوان صلاة نافله شناخته میشده! 😳❌ 💥 اما استاد هاشمی در یک پاسخ محکم و مستند 📜، نشان میدهند که این ادعا سراسر غلط است! 😤🔻 ✅ بحث اصلی این است که نماز مستحب در ماه رمضان، بهصورت فرادا صحیح است، اما خواندن آن به جماعت، بدعت است! 🚫‼️ …
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @abdulsaheb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 295,425 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سید عبدالصاحب هاشمی /فارسی” (@abdulsaheb), 529 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/abdulsaheb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.