Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة| عبد العزيز التويجري

Channel

قناة| عبد العزيز التويجري

@aaggcc0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

477subscribers

+56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003979956563
TypeChannel
Username@aaggcc0
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 29 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aaggcc0

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

420477448.56 August 2026 — 421 subscribers7 August 2026 — 420 subscribers15 August 2026 — 437 subscribers23 August 2026 — 441 subscribers31 August 2026 — 450 subscribers9 September 2026 — 470 subscribers18 September 2026 — 477 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 411–486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:38477+7
9 Sept 2026, 00:19470+20
31 Aug 2026, 02:24450+9
23 Aug 2026, 16:06441+4
15 Aug 2026, 02:54437+17
7 Aug 2026, 20:44420-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:48421first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1644.4%
❤1130.6%
👌719.4%
👎12.78%
🤬12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC78 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❁ قاعدة فيمن تكثر أوهامه. ● قيل لابن الأخضر: ألا تجيب عن بعض أوهام ابن الجوزي؟ قال: «إنما يتتبع على من قل غلطه، فأما هذا، فأوهامه كثيرة». السير: (٢١/ ٣٨٢). وابن الأخضر من حفاظ الحنابلة تـ(٦١١)، انظر ترجمته في ذيل ابن رجب: (٣/ ١٦٧). ● وقال الحافظ ابن عبد الهادي معلقا على كلام ابن الجوزي: «وقد حصل للمؤلف فيما ذكره هنا من الكلام على تضعيف الأحاديث أوهام عديدة، وتقصير كثير، فإنه ضعف غير واحد من الصادقين، وترك الكلام ع…

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❁ نقد المتن بالتاريخ! (٤/ ٦). ● ومن نقد المتأخرين في هذا الباب: ○ نقل الذهبي حديث مجاهد، عن أسماء بنت عميس، قالت: كنت صاحبة عائشة التي هيأتها وأدخلتها على رسول ﷲ -ﷺ-... ثم قال: «ثم هو خطأ، فإن أسماء كانت وقت عرس عائشة بالحبشة مع جعفر بن أبي طالب، ولا نعلم لمجاهد سماعا عن أسماء، أو لعلها أسماء بنت يزيد، فإنها روت عجز هذا الحديث». السير: (٢/ ١٧٣). ○ وذكر الذهبي حديث يزيد بن عياض عن هشام بن عروة، عن أبيه، قال: دخل…

❤2

4 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❁ ما جاء في سحْق المَشاعر! ● قال حمزة بن عبد الله بن عمر: «كنت أحس من نفسي بحسن صوت، وكان صوت سالم بن عبد الله كرغاء البعير، فقلت له: أنا أحسن منك صوتا، فقال لنا عبد الله بن عمر: خذا حتى أسمع، فغنينا غناء الركبان، فقلت لأبي: أينا أحسن صوتا؟ فقال: أنتما كحماري العبادي». تاريخ دمشق: (١٥/ ٢٠٨). وانظر الخبر باختلاف في تسمية أصحابه، وفيه معنى: (حماري عبادي) عند ابن قتيبة في عيون الأخبار: (١/ ٤٤٣). ◾️وعلى ذكر الأصوات …

❤3👌1👍1

3 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC177 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❁ عن أي شيء امتنع أحمد بعد المحنة؟(١/ ٤). ● قال عبد الله: «سئل -يعني أباه- عن سفيان بن وكيع، قبل أن يموت بأيام عشرة أو أقل: يكتب عنه؟ فقال: نعم، ما أعلم إلا خيرا». العلل: (١٥١٠). قلت: توفي سفيان بن وكيع عام: ٢٤٧. فالسؤال قبل موت أحمد بعشرة أيام، والسائل ليس ابنه عبد الله. وسفيان بن وكيع مضعف متروك عند أكثر الحفاظ، ويظهر أن أحمد لم يكثر عنه فهو من أقرانه، وحاله قريب من حال ابن حميد حيث خفيت حاله على أحمد، وتقدم الكل…

❤4👍2👌1

2 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❁ لا ترم الناس بالحجارة إذا كان بيتك من زجاج! ● قال يحيى بن سعيد القطان: «قال رجل لمحمد بن إسحاق: كيف حديث شرحبيل بن سعد؟ فقال: وأحد يحدث عن شرحبيل بن سعد؟! قال يحيى: فالعجب! رجل يحدث عن أهل الكتاب، ويرغب عن أن يحدث عن شرحبيل». علل الفلاس: (٢١). قلت: ويحيى سيء الرأي جدا في ابن إسحاق، قال أحمد: «ما رأيت يحيى بن سعيد أسوأ رأيا في أحد منه في محمد بن إسحاق، وليث، وهمام، لا يستطيع أحد أن يراجعه فيهم». ضعفاء العقيلي: (٣/…

👍4

1 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC199 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

❁ وهمان في ترجمة الجوزجاني. ● قال مغلطاي في ترجمة الجوزجاني: «وقال السجزي، وسألته -يعني الحاكم- عن الجوزجاني، فقال: ثقة مأمون، إلا أنه طويل اللسان، وكان يستخف بمسلم بن الحجاج فغمزه مسلم بلا حجة». إكمال تهذيب الكمال: (١/ ٣٢٤). قلت: النص في سؤالات السجزي: «وسألته عن ابراهيم بن عبد الله السعدي فقال: ثقة مأمون، إلا أنه طويل اللسان، وكان يستخف بمسلم بن الحجاج فغمزه مسلم بلا حجة». سؤالات السجزي: (٤١). وقد وهم مغلطاي في…

👌2❤1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aaggcc0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة| عبد العزيز التويجري” (@aaggcc0), 477 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aaggcc0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.