Channel
@aaa68vv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
617subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004213064933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aaa68vv |
| Created | 5 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aaa68vv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 617 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 611 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 611 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 158 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤥广州花都94·尊享、全裸SPA 😀😀😀😀😀😕😀😀 服务内容: 消费低至，419-499起 基础保健，摸鲍、舔棍、波推，真胸调情，丝足诱惑，美女划船，指尖调情，360 度胸推臀推，刮痧过水，舌尖漫游，69 式调情，倒挂金钩，穿孔桥，温水回笼、海底捞🈷️、高山流水💦等 #会所 现场选妃：😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 频道有照片，任挑任选，不满意下一批，换到满意为止，或者喜欢什么类型告知，帮君挑选喜欢类型 😂选妃点击此处蓝色字体😂 👱♀️多人同行优惠介绍👱♀️ 两人同行优恵 60 ¥ 三人同行优惠 90 ¥ 四人同行优惠120 ¥ 五人同行优惠150 ¥ 六人同行一人免单 预约方式：😀😀😀 ❤️TG：@A68dai 🤖双向：@aaa68vvBot 😀😀频道：@aaa68vv 💁交流群：@aaa68vvv 📞前台电话：16620030843 免费停车，免费过夜，无隐藏消费 24小时简餐 营业时间：中午 12 点到凌晨 5 点半
#广州 #花都 #全裸4T #九四 广州花都精品高端❾❹★会所 🤪😜😜😜😜😜😜 ⚡精品会所火热预约中⚡ ⚡技师多⚡颜值高⚡零零后⚡ 网红兼职⚡超级嫩模⚡气质御姐 海选模式⚡敬请挑选⚡满意为止 《各种制服任军挑选》 一直传承全方位整套会所服务 为男人打造尊享服务！ 到店排钟🏋️♀️一对一服务 停车方便 明码标价 安全靠谱 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 《尊享SAP原价519 》 活动价419元6️⃣70分钟 激情半果情趣裤时间之内无限出水 👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌 《至尊SAP原价599 》 …
❤2
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @aaa68vv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 173,979 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州花都佳美国际会所” (@aaa68vv), 617 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aaa68vv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.