广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf

Channel
广州榨汁大队选妃区
@zzddvip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51,655subscribers
+820 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001967095101 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @zhazhiguangzhouxf @zzddvip |
| Description | 广州全区手势认证🔥排雷Top One🔥 榨汁管理员: @gzgly1 双向机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 广州聊天群: https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhou |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzddvip |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 51,655 | +197 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 51,458 | +99 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 51,359 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 51,352 | +106 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 51,246 | +41 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 51,205 | +120 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 51,085 | +17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 51,068 | +79 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 50,989 | +54 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 50,935 | +81 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 50,854 | +19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 50,835 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 50,835 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.01%
- avg views ÷ 51,655 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 521
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,936 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,090
- Videos
- ≈795
- Links
- ≈274
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 26s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
抽奖总汇:https://t.me/choujiangzh 🎟️ 抽奖标题:广州花都精品高端94会所 @A68dai 📪抽奖说明:中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息 本次抽奖活动3日后开奖,中奖者联系客服兑奖,中奖后10内有效, 🎫 参与条件: 🎫 加入-广州花都佳美国际会所 🎫 加入-广州榨汁大队 🎫 加入-广州榨汁大队选妃区 🎫 加入-广州榨汁玩法及抽奖活动规则 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 30优惠卷 × 60 💰️ 50优惠卷 × 10 💰️ 80优惠卷 × 5 💰️ 半价优惠卷 × 1 📅 开奖时间:2026-08-15 12:00自动开奖 👉 参与抽奖链接: https://t.me/choujiangs_bot?start=join-L178654055143
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
老师艺名:#海珠 #可可抓龙筋 验证方式:手势验证 身材比例:165cm 🐻C 消费价位: 398 598 联系方式: @hzzlj521 双向联系: @hzzlj521bot 频道简介: @bb520dd 验证报告: @zhazhigzbaogao 全国榨汁: @quanguozz
广州榨汁大队上榜进群发言须知 广州榨汁聊天群:@zhazhiguangzhou 广州榨汁选妃区 : @zzddvip 上榜资料: 打电话手势照片一张,普通照片一张,课表一张,普通视频一个 上榜福利: 本月活动全部按照续费会员收费 广州榨汁大队,靠谱老群,专业做群,值得信奈 广州榨汁大队只有一个管理,认准 唯一号 @gzgly1 机器人 @zhazhigz_bot 电报骗子很多,不会主动私聊,私聊的都是骗子, 不知道打电话手势怎么拍参考选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhiguangzhouxf
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @zzddvip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 961,214 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广州榨汁大队选妃区” (@zzddvip), 51,655 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzddvip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.