Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

洋洋很开心

@aa85849188

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,110subscribers

-61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004478726065
TypeChannel
Username@aa85849188
Created27 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aa85849188

Growth

1,1101,1711,140.56 August 2026 — 1,171 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,171 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,132 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,110 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,101–1,180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 12:341,110-22
10 Aug 2026, 07:081,132-39
6 Aug 2026, 20:311,171no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:191,171first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.8%
avg views ÷ 1,110 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.152%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held11 (27 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total8,507
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
787.5%
😁112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC516 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @godagent007Video

米其林2.0,硬件权重60%,软件权重40%,按照加权平均分予以评级,只针对妹子素质客观评价 (课室分仅供参考不计入个总分评级) 老师名字:洋洋 老师电报号: @linxx199123 硬件: 颜值 3.67 (人照8分,视频能看出来是本人但美颜的比较多,典型两广地域长相,第一眼科技感较强看久后还算耐看,细看可见轻微岁月痕迹,五官底子还行属于偏清秀的类型,刚做了鼻子,20多天,有科技痕迹) 妆品 3.92 (整体妆品还行,基本算伪素颜妆,没有过多的修饰痕迹,很贴肤,唇彩也不错) 皮肤 4.42 (皮肤细腻光滑,没有一点纹身,白的发光,,吹弹可破。唯一缺点就是肋骨鼻疤痕刚刚好,但是却没有增生,平平的一道;脸上皮肤状态一般) 胸 4.67 (c+天然腺体胸,乳头乳晕又小又粉,而且挺拔,初看见我还以为是做的,一摸纯天然手感软且不下垂,站立状态基本也可保持挺立) 腰 4.00 (比较正常的细腰,没有什么赘肉,也没有明显的健

4

27 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,330 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

明天换好地方了,今天没约上的哥哥可以约明天

😁1

27 Jul 2026, 01:59 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 6 August 2026

‼️‼️展览会福利群: 免费拿5折6折7折优惠 和抽奖 白嫖 现金红包 本群专属手势认证高质量老师 上海艺术展览会福利群: https://t.me/+nFnE0wANtSRkMjEx 点击进去备用群 上海艺术展览会总榜单:https://t.me/+2i_egsiBxNFlNmJh 上海艺术展览会人气推荐榜 https://t.me/+vOj1VuT48NE3MDc1 上海艺术展览会中转平台 https://t.me/+-sIwH2NalFw2MzEy 展览会老师广告群 @shanghaiyishu 个人推荐频道88🧧 📡 上榜管理:@yishuja_bot 📡 管理秘书:@Yishujia798_bot

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @aa85849188. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 379,578 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“洋洋很开心” (@aa85849188), 1,110 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aa85849188.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.