Channel
@Zharfapsych
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
214subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004467751464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zharfapsych |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zharfapsych |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 214 | -21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 235 | +79 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 156 | -90 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 246 | +7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 239 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 233 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 233 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 92.2% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.49% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خب سلام به همگی دوستانم که به دنبال مواجهه با محتوای درون روان شون هستن و نه اجتناب و فرار🩵🌌 هفته آینده قراره که سراغ تله های زندگی بریم بهتر دیدم که قبلش شما این پرسشنامه تله های زندگی پر کنین ببینین که کدوم بیشتر شامل حال شما میشه تا بعد با آگاهی کارآمدتری سراغ تله ها بریم ❄️نحوه تفسیر نمرات:بالاترین نمره ی شما نشانگر این است که این تله زندگی بیشترین تاثیر را در زندگی فعلی شما داشته است و احتمالا بر زندگی آینده شم…
❤5
مغز انسان بهطور طبیعی از رنجِ مواجهه فرار میکند. روانشناسی زرد با فروختن «اجتناب در بستهبندیِ حال خوب» خریدار بیشتری پیدا میکند، اما واقعیت این است که شفای روانی هرگز از مسیر فرار نمیگذرد؛ بلکه از دلِ روبرو شدن عبور میکند. امیدوارم من و شما از دسته افرادی باشیم که رنجِ درمان را به آرامشِ موقت اما ناکارآمد ترجیح میدهند؛ در این راه هم برای خود و هم برای دیگران قدمی برمیدارند و یکی از مهمترین اصول، یعنی آگاهسا…
❤7👎1
یک واقعیت تلخ! چرا روانشناسی زرد محبوبتر از رواندرمانگری است؟ این سوال عوامل متعددی دارد، اما شاید یکی از تأملبرانگیزترین دلایل آن یک کلمه باشد: مواجهه تمام رویکردهای اصیل درمانی تلاش میکنند این رویارویی را برای ما رقم بزنند؛ گاهی ما را با یک فکر ناکارآمد، گاهی با اضطرابهایی که سعی در انکارشان داریم و در کل با محتوای ذهنیِ سازندهٔ رفتارها و هیجانات ناخوشایندمان مواجه میکنند. اما این مواجهه اغلب دردناک، زمانبر…
👍4❤2
نکته بعدی هم اینکه ریکشن های کانال باز کردم دوستان تا بتونم یک بازخوردی ازتون بگیرم،میتونید نظراتتون هم در قالب پیام ناشناس هم ریکشن کانال درباره مطالب بگید🩵
❤10👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9
سلام ظهر همگی بخیر بریم سراغ آخرین سبک رفتاری یعنی سبک جبران افراطی بعد از این مباحث وارد تک به تک تله های زندگی میشیم شما اگر این سه سبک خوب به خاطر بسپارین کاملا مشخص میشه برای خودتون که اولا کدوم تله رو دارین و ثانیا در مواجهه با هر تله در موقعیت های مختلف چه مدل پاسخ رفتاری دارید
❤9
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
سلام ب همگی بریم سراغ سبک بعدی یعنی سبک اجتنابی
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
سلام دوستان عزیزم توی این هفته قراره به سبکهای مقابله ای بپردازیم امیدوارم که پست هایی که میفرستم براتون مفید باشه🩵 امروز نوبت به سبک تسلیمی میرسه✨ https://t.me/Zharfapsych
❤2
دوستان عزیزم امشب درمورد سبک های مقابله ای و همچنین برنامه ای که در ادامه قراره بهش بپردازیم گفتم امیدوارم که براتون مفید باشه🩵
❤3
ادامه مسیر
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zharfapsych. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ژرفا” (@Zharfapsych), 214 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zharfapsych.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.