Ağaye məzlum xudahafiz 💔🕊️
custom 53054016241795267907

Channel
@Yaqqeen313
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
169subscribers
+61 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002843898125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Yaqqeen313 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Yaqqeen313 |
@Yaqqeen313 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 169 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 172 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 172 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:47 | 173 | +55 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 118 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 109 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 109 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 108 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (17 July 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,178 |
| Reactions total | 215 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
394 reactions across 36 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5305776355781133491 | 60 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5336822282067137266 | 47 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5206484636112287449 | 42 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5253674902082329079 | 42 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5242483565928658798 | 33 | 8.38% | |
| custom 5323389307992426809 | 29 | 7.36% | |
| custom 5305401624179526790 | 27 | 6.85% | |
| custom 5204250187966477071 | 20 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5206272769670541381 | 20 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5305741854308844650 | 14 | 3.55% | |
| custom 5456543516190592871 | 13 | 3.30% | |
| custom 5201874104684137407 | 12 | 3.05% | |
| custom 5323327778290946054 | 11 | 2.79% | |
| custom 5206187269756581151 | 10 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5407130488680760568 | 10 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5303324380426682806 | 4 | 1.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 394 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Yaqqeen313. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ağaye məzlum xudahafiz 💔🕊️
custom 53054016241795267907
Чудо Аллаха. Вы когда нибудь замечали у всех людей нос, губы, брови, уши, глаза на одном месте, но лица у всех разные. سبحان الله
custom 530577635578113349110custom 52536749020823290798
Kişi əməlindən bəlli olar.
custom 520648463611228744911custom 52424835659286587982
Братья и сёстры, у кого есть телеграм премиум, проголосуйте за наш канал, дабы посты стали ещё качественнее.
custom 525367490208232907911custom 52064846361122874492
«Ахбариты» и «Усулиты» | «Таклид» ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Таклид у “Ахбаритов”. ✍ Фейз аль-Кашани: «Это следование ясным аятам Книги (Корана), Сунны и хадисам Ахль аль-Бейт (мир им), избегая при этом двусмысленных аятов, как это делали ранние ученые, и многие люди нашего времени и предки следовали их примеру». 📚 Источник: аль-Усуль аль-Асыля, страница 181 —— ✍ Шейх Мухсин аль-Усфур: «Это процесс, когда обычный челове…
custom 52424835659286587989custom 53057418543088446503custom 54565435161905928712
О Рахбар, наши души тоскуют по тебе. 🕊️💔🥀 https://t.me/Yaqqeen313
custom 530577635578113349111
Первый пост на тему «Ахбариты» и «Усулиты». بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Хочу сказать, что с нашими братьями-ахбаритами нет различий в акыде, что они, что мы признаём Аллаха, его Посланника и его Имамов. Поэтому что Ахбариты, что Усулиты являются мусульманами и мум'инами. И все посты, которые будут на эту тему, не будут сделаны с целью вражды или принижения, а лишь только и только научный образ. P.S. Я усулит.
custom 524248356592865879812custom 52064846361122874493
На какую тему хотели бы видеть посты?
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вопрос заданный в боте: "Как сделать молитву снова живой и искренней,как вернуть желание к молитве,Корану,зикрам?" ✍ Ответ: Подготовил для вас перевод одной статьи: Намаз 𝐘𝐚𝐪𝐞𝐞𝐧 | اليقين
custom 53233277782909460548
Нафс и его уровни. Нафс аль-аммара (النفس الأمّارة بالسوء) — нафс, побуждающий ко злу. Это состояние, когда желания, страсти, эгоизм и гнев управляют человеком. Коран: «Воистину, нафс побуждает к злу…» (12:53). Нафс аль-лаввама (النفس اللوّامة) — упрекающий себя нафс Человек уже осознаёт свои ошибки, испытывает сожаление и внутренне борется со своими страстями. Это важный этап пробуждения. Коран: «Клянусь душой, …
custom 530577635578113349112custom 53057418543088446504custom 52064846361122874492custom 54565435161905928711
🥀
custom 53054016241795267907custom 54565435161905928711
Братья и сёстры, можете боту также ✍ писать о латмиях, перевод которых хотели бы видеть.
custom 52064846361122874494custom 52536749020823290794custom 53057763557811334911
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Yaqqeen313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На какую тему хотели бы видеть посты?
The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐘𝐚𝐪𝐞𝐞𝐧 | اليقين” (@Yaqqeen313), 169 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Yaqqeen313.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.