Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for XUSD AU FOREX BUY AND SELL SIGNALS 💯

Channel

XUSD AU FOREX BUY AND SELL SIGNALS 💯

@XUSDFOREXBUY_SELLSIGNALS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

125,474subscribers

-10,194 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003693220543
TypeChannel
Username@XUSDFOREXBUY_SELLSIGNALS
Description⚜️BEST Technical Analysis ⚜️Best Trader - Master Of Market King is here to give back what we have learned and earned. ✔️ FREE EDUCATION ( Ebook ) ✔️ FREE SIGNAL ( 95% winning rate ) ✔️ FREE MAPPING ✔️ TP AND SL PROVIDED
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/XUSDFOREXBUY_SELLSIGNALS

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

12.7 average views per post against 125,474 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.01%. Across the 1,168 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,014–314,959 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 0.941% and 8.76%, with a median of 3.46%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Posts measured145 of 145 published in the window (145 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,847
Mature posts only0.012% over 91 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers125,474 measured 29 September 2026
Cohortb100000:eng · 1,168 channels · p10 0.281% · p25 0.941% · p50 3.46% · p75 8.76% · p90 16.7%
Position in cohort0.857th percentile · 1/333 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.23% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 30 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

125,474135,668130,5717 August 2026 — 135,668 subscribers7 August 2026 — 135,668 subscribers8 August 2026 — 135,602 subscribers9 August 2026 — 135,430 subscribers10 August 2026 — 135,189 subscribers11 August 2026 — 135,059 subscribers12 August 2026 — 134,889 subscribers13 August 2026 — 134,666 subscribers14 August 2026 — 134,410 subscribers16 August 2026 — 134,130 subscribers17 August 2026 — 133,835 subscribers18 August 2026 — 133,600 subscribers19 August 2026 — 133,453 subscribers20 August 2026 — 133,262 subscribers21 August 2026 — 133,037 subscribers23 August 2026 — 132,586 subscribers24 August 2026 — 132,045 subscribers25 August 2026 — 131,713 subscribers26 August 2026 — 131,428 subscribers27 August 2026 — 131,250 subscribers28 August 2026 — 130,917 subscribers29 August 2026 — 130,803 subscribers30 August 2026 — 130,441 subscribers31 August 2026 — 130,087 subscribers1 September 2026 — 129,806 subscribers3 September 2026 — 129,572 subscribers4 September 2026 — 129,203 subscribers8 September 2026 — 128,857 subscribers10 September 2026 — 128,227 subscribers12 September 2026 — 127,881 subscribers14 September 2026 — 127,693 subscribers16 September 2026 — 127,467 subscribers18 September 2026 — 127,247 subscribers29 September 2026 — 125,474 subscribers7 August 202629 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 53 days, net -10,194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123,945–137,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 19:37125,474-1,773
18 Sept 2026, 04:20127,247-220
16 Sept 2026, 00:01127,467-226
14 Sept 2026, 08:36127,693-188
12 Sept 2026, 20:39127,881-346
10 Sept 2026, 23:18128,227-630
8 Sept 2026, 00:40128,857-346
4 Sept 2026, 19:00129,203-369
3 Sept 2026, 00:58129,572-234
1 Sept 2026, 20:27129,806-281
31 Aug 2026, 22:17130,087-354
30 Aug 2026, 20:25130,441-362
29 Aug 2026, 20:58130,803-114
28 Aug 2026, 23:25130,917-333
27 Aug 2026, 20:45131,250-178
26 Aug 2026, 22:57131,428-285
25 Aug 2026, 20:34131,713-332
24 Aug 2026, 23:43132,045-541
23 Aug 2026, 08:34132,586-451
21 Aug 2026, 21:57133,037first reading

Engagement

514 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.01%
avg views ÷ 125,474 subscribers
Avg views / post
12.7
145 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
145
of 514 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 110 of 145 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held514 (7 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total1,847
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 10:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,810
Videos
≈313
Links
≈49

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
47s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 151 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏2817.1%
❤2615.9%
🔥169.76%
💯148.54%
❤‍🔥106.10%
🐳106.10%
💩95.49%
😍95.49%
🏆84.88%
⚡74.27%
👌74.27%
😘53.05%
🙏53.05%
🤮53.05%
🥰53.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 514 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 514 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC3 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Good morning Wednesday☀️ Try first don't give excuse. Just do it. Do it until you achieved your target. Yesterday market was really good with us. The zone and the profits really sharp. Today let's do more better guys 👊🏻

❤1

29 Sept 2026, 12:43 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026

GOLD SELL NOW @ 4155 - 4165 SL 4170 TP 4145 TP 4135

❤‍🔥1

29 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Move SL to 4149.4 ok lets allow this sideway to re-test it

😘1

29 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTC14 views2 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Gold sell now 4138.6 - 4142 SL: 4147 TP: 4136 TP: 4134 TP: 4132 TP: 4130 TP: 4128 TP: open

🤮2

29 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTC14 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Good morning Tuesday 😎 Standby first, let king monitor today's pair what we can rob okay On notification & Pin this channel 🔝

28 Sept 2026, 11:21 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

GOOD MORNING MONDAY ☀️ Traders don’t chase luck. We wait for confirmation and execute with confidence. No risk, No story Unmute & Pin My Channel.

💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 514 posts we hold for @XUSDFOREXBUY_SELLSIGNALS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“XUSD AU FOREX BUY AND SELL SIGNALS 💯” (@XUSDFOREXBUY_SELLSIGNALS), 125,474 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/XUSDFOREXBUY_SELLSIGNALS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.