GOLD RUNNING 64+PIPS MORE ! Scalper collect half layers now and apply breakeven to your layers .
โก2โค1๐ฅ1

Channel
@fx_profitsignals_free
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Cite this entry
161,447subscribers
-7,973 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002273555378 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fx_profitsignals_free |
| Description | Live report ๐ @Henry_Pedrofx โ๏ธBEST Technical Analysis โ๏ธBest Trader - Master Of Market Iโm here to give back what I have learned and earned. โ๏ธ FREE EDUCATION ( Ebook ) โ๏ธ FREE SIGNAL ( 95% winning rate ) โ๏ธ FREE MAPPING โ๏ธ TP AND SL PROVIDED |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fx_profitsignals_free |
Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
13.9 average views per post against 161,447 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 0.009%. Across the 1,133 registered channels in the same cohort โ 100,013โ316,123 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ the middle half sit between 0.956% and 8.71%, with a median of 3.51%.
| Window | 30 days (7 September 2026 โ 7 October 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 149 of 149 published in the window (149 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 2,072 |
| Mature posts only | 0.011% over 70 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 161,447 measured 4 October 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:eng ยท 1,133 channels ยท p10 0.286% ยท p25 0.956% ยท p50 3.51% ยท p75 8.71% ยท p90 16.4% |
| Position in cohort | 0.618th percentile ยท 1/500 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ยฑ0.179% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding |
| Post language | English ยท 100.0% of the windowโs posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ below it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 7 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 14:02 | 161,447 | -1,055 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 162,502 | -759 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 163,261 | -239 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 163,500 | -221 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 163,721 | -124 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 163,845 | -259 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 164,104 | -403 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 164,507 | -382 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 164,889 | -181 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 165,070 | -187 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:44 | 165,257 | -136 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 165,393 | -138 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 165,531 | -218 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 165,749 | -225 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 165,974 | -93 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 166,067 | -139 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 166,206 | -163 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 166,369 | -199 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 166,568 | -232 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 166,800 | first reading |
536 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 124 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 148 of 149 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 536 (7 August 2026 โ 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,072 |
| Reactions total | 496 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 22:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 6 October 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
517 reactions across 168 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โคโ๐ฅ | 52 | 10.1% | |
| โค | 42 | 8.12% | |
| ๐ | 40 | 7.74% | |
| ๐ฏ | 40 | 7.74% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 40 | 7.74% | |
| ๐ | 37 | 7.16% | |
| ๐ | 37 | 7.16% | |
| ๐ | 36 | 6.96% | |
| ๐พ | 35 | 6.77% | |
| ๐ | 35 | 6.77% | |
| ๐ณ | 32 | 6.19% | |
| ๐คฎ | 32 | 6.19% | |
| ๐ฅ | 31 | 6.00% | |
| โก | 28 | 5.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 168 of the 536 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 536 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
GOLD RUNNING 64+PIPS MORE ! Scalper collect half layers now and apply breakeven to your layers .
โก2โค1๐ฅ1
1ST TP TRIGGERED 90+PIPS ! Collect another half and hold only 1-2 layers guys !
๐2๐ฅ1๐1
+60pips now, secure what it need. Set breakeven to keep risk-free. If the buyer is out, this is the last resistance
๐2โค1๐คฎ1
100pips from zoneโ Letโs CLOSE our trade now and set breakeven if you wish to hold now
โค2โก1๐1
GOLD RUNNING 60+PIPS NOW ! Scalper collect half and set your layer with breakeven !
๐พ1๐1๐ฏ1๐คฎ1
Sticker, posted without a caption
โคโ๐ฅ1๐ฅ1๐คฎ1๐1
Gold sell now: 4153.5 sl: 4163.5 tp 1: 4147.5 tp 2: 4138.5
โก2๐พ1๐ณ1
TakeProfit 4 hitttt๐๐๐ค
โคโ๐ฅ1๐พ1๐ณ1๐คฎ1
130+ pipssss๐๐๐ค
โคโ๐ฅ2๐คฎ2๐1
TakeProfit 3 incominggg๐๐ฐ๐
โค1โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐1
TakeProfit 3 hit๐ฐ๐
โค1โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐คฎ1
TakeProfit 3 incominggg๐๐ฐ๐
๐ฏ1๐1๐คฎ1๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 536 posts we hold for @fx_profitsignals_free. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โFX PROFIT SIGNALS ๐ฏ (FREE)๐๐โ (@fx_profitsignals_free), 161,447 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fx_profitsignals_free.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.