Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GOLD FOREX SIGNALS (FREE)

Channel

GOLD FOREX SIGNALS (FREE)

@gold_forexx_signalsfx

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Cite this entry

25,133subscribers

-1,388 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559187174
TypeChannel
Username@gold_forexx_signalsfx
DescriptionStay tuned if you're interested in getting amazing signals daily with up to 95% accuracy for free😍 Contact me to subscribe or invest @Henry_Pedrofx This is the dream channel, and i hope we help make all your financial dreams come true.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/gold_forexx_signalsfx

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

6.0 average views per post against 25,133 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.024%. Across the 2,158 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,002–31,596 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.05% and 12.6%, with a median of 5.79%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (9 September 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Posts measured49 of 49 published in the window (49 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled294
Mature posts only0.027% over 37 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers25,133 measured 6 October 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 2,158 channels · p10 0.505% · p25 2.05% · p50 5.79% · p75 12.6% · p90 22.5%
Position in cohort0.649th percentile · 1/250 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.115% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 9 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

25,13326,52125,8277 August 2026 — 26,521 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,521 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,495 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,472 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,452 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,428 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,403 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,371 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,341 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,286 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,250 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,226 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,204 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,174 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,149 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,090 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,044 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,019 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,980 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,958 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,928 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,915 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,880 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,837 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,820 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,787 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,755 subscribers7 September 2026 — 25,715 subscribers10 September 2026 — 25,637 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,594 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,570 subscribers16 September 2026 — 25,540 subscribers18 September 2026 — 25,509 subscribers1 October 2026 — 25,245 subscribers6 October 2026 — 25,133 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 60 days, net -1,388. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,925–26,729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 17:1425,133-112
1 Oct 2026, 21:0025,245-264
18 Sept 2026, 08:5725,509-31
16 Sept 2026, 00:0125,540-30
14 Sept 2026, 07:1825,570-24
12 Sept 2026, 13:5925,594-43
10 Sept 2026, 12:5925,637-78
7 Sept 2026, 07:4025,715-40
4 Sept 2026, 12:1625,755-32
2 Sept 2026, 23:3625,787-33
1 Sept 2026, 22:5525,820-17
1 Sept 2026, 00:5525,837-43
30 Aug 2026, 23:0625,880-35
29 Aug 2026, 22:0625,915-13
28 Aug 2026, 22:5825,928-30
27 Aug 2026, 23:5625,958-22
27 Aug 2026, 01:3525,980-39
26 Aug 2026, 04:4426,019-25
25 Aug 2026, 07:5826,044-46
24 Aug 2026, 05:2926,090first reading

Engagement

413 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.024%
avg views ÷ 25,133 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.0
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 413 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held413 (7 August 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total294
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 10:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈18,500
Videos
≈956
Links
≈274

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
51s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 66 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.45% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯68.45%
🦄57.04%
✍45.63%
👍45.63%
🔥45.63%
❤34.23%
🕊34.23%
😇34.23%
😎34.23%
🎄22.82%
🎉22.82%
👎22.82%
👏22.82%
💅22.82%
💘22.82%
🤣22.82%
🤨22.82%
☃11.41%
⚡11.41%
🆒11.41%
17 further kinds1723.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 413 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 413 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

We have to accept the loss. Even tho I still believe in the direction because the falling wedge pattern is actually a very strong one, because it fakes all the direction downwards and then at some point it shoots up. Anyways, I’m here guys for you with you. I’ll make sure to take a small rest. Let the charts play some and then get back in and recover this with you together.🙏🏽

🎄1🤨1

7 Oct 2026, 08:56 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 9 October 2026

Gold buy now 4125.5 - 4122 SL: 4118 TP: 4127.5 TP: 4129 TP: 4131 TP: 4133 TP: 4135

🕊1🤗1

7 Oct 2026, 08:55 UTC7 views2 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

Good morning Wednesday☀️ Try first don't give excuse. Just do it. Do it until you achieved your target. Yesterday market was really good with us. The zone and the profits really sharp. Today let's do more better guys 👊🏻

👎1🦄1

6 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

1ST TP TRIGGERED 90+PIPS ! Collect another half and hold only 1-2 layers guys !

🎄1

6 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

GOLD RUNNING 64+PIPS MORE ! Scalper collect half layers now and apply breakeven to your layers .

✍1

6 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

100pips from zone✅ Let’s CLOSE our trade now and set breakeven if you wish to hold now

🦄1

6 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC4 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

+60pips now, secure what it need. Set breakeven to keep risk-free. If the buyer is out, this is the last resistance

🎅1

6 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC5 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

GOLD RUNNING 60+PIPS NOW ! Scalper collect half and set your layer with breakeven !

😘1

6 Oct 2026, 08:46 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 9 October 2026

Gold sell now: 4153.5 sl: 4163.5 tp 1: 4147.5 tp 2: 4138.5

🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 413 posts we hold for @gold_forexx_signalsfx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@gold_forexx_signalsfx edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GOLD FOREX SIGNALS (FREE)” (@gold_forexx_signalsfx), 25,133 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gold_forexx_signalsfx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.