Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

우산 X NNN의 아이디어

@WoosanXNNN

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry

12,101subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002322948689
TypeChannel
Username@WoosanXNNN
Description열정 넘치는 두 명의 PB가 변화하는 섹터와 기업에 대한 아이디어를 공유합니다. * 언급한 섹터/종목에 대해 매수/매도를 제안하지 않고, 작성 시점 관련 종목 보유 여부를 확인해드릴 수 없습니다. * 작성된 자료는 신뢰할 수 있는 정보를 기반으로 작성했으나 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WoosanXNNN

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@nnninvestment/60742 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC@WoosanXNNN/3636 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC1.002 minutes
@nnninvestment/60762 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC@WoosanXNNN/3638 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC1.002 minutes
@nnninvestment/60772 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC@WoosanXNNN/3639 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC1.002 minutes
@nnninvestment/60792 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC@WoosanXNNN/3641 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC1.002 minutes
@nnninvestment/60812 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC@WoosanXNNN/3643 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC1.002 minutes
@nnninvestment/60822 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC@WoosanXNNN/3644 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC1.002 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@nnninvestment10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@nnninvestment (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @nnninvestment. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

12,10112,12412,112.57 August 2026 — 12,122 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,121 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,124 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,120 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,115 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,109 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,101 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,098–12,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:4712,101-8
12 Aug 2026, 21:5412,109-6
11 Aug 2026, 18:4412,115-5
10 Aug 2026, 15:4812,120-4
9 Aug 2026, 12:3612,124+3
8 Aug 2026, 09:4112,121-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:3112,122first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 12,101 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,690
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held29 (2 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total75,450
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,440
Videos
5
Links
1,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.14) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224378710633) 美 물가·유가 함께 꺾였다… S&P500 사상 최고치(조선일보) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/023/0003992969?sid=101 美 7월 생산자물가 전망치 하회(매일경제) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/009/0005720933?sid=101 : 미국의 7월 PPI가 CPI에 이어 전망치를 하회하며 시장이 크게 안도하는 모습. MoM 보합으로 +0.2%의 전망치를 밑돔. 이로 인해 물가와 유가, 금리까지 모두 안정되는 모습이었으며 이를 바탕으로 S&P500 지수는 역사상 최고치를 경신 ​ "코스피, 새 상승

13 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.13) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224377639506) 美 7월 CPI 3.4%…Fed 금리동결에 힘 실리나(아시아경제) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/277/0005802342?sid=101 : 7월 미국 물가지표가 예상치에 부합하게 나오면서 9월 금리 인상 전망이 재차 약화됨. 미국 국채 금리도 어느 정도는 안정을 찾으면서 주식 시장도 부담을 덜어내는 모습 ​ 美 10년물 국채,2007년 이후 최고 수익률 낙찰…예상 거의 부합(연합인포맥스) https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4429866 : 다만 여전히 장기 국채 금리에 대한 우려는 존재

12 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC≈2,140 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.12) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224376648575) 파키스탄 국방장관 "미국·이란, 모종의 합의에 근접"(연합뉴스) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/001/0016245780?sid=104 ‘합의 근접’ 헛물켰다…유가 상승에 인플레 경고등(매경이코노미) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/024/0000107484?sid=101 : 합의에 근접했다는 이야기도 나오고 있으나 다시 유가가 상승하면서 곧 발표될 물가 지표에 대한 우려감을 다시 키움. 추가적으로 확실한 소식이 나오기 전까지는 유가는 계속 변동성이 있을 듯. 일각에서는 구조적 원유 부족에 대한 전망도 나오고 있음

11 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC≈2,330 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.11) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224375377698) 美·이란 호르무즈 협상 난항…WTI 5% 급등해 다시 80달러 넘겨(뉴스1) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/421/0009106697?sid=101 : 협상이 제한적으로만 이루어지고 있다는 이야기, 이란 협상에 강경파가 나섰다는 이야기 등 노이즈가 또 다시 발생하며 유가가 오르고 미국 증시는 소폭 하락 마감. 다만 큰 변화가 있는 상황은 아님 ​ [단독] “단일종목 레버리지 배율 낮춰야” 국회 입법조사처 제안(조선일보) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/023/0003992358?sid=101 : 단일종목 레버리지 E

10 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.10) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224374404511) 레버리지 막으니 코스닥이 살아났다(서울경제) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/011/0004650304?sid=101 : 단일종목 레버리지 ETF 규제 이후 7거래일간 코스닥이 무려 32.5% 폭등하며 850선을 회복. 코스피의 반등이 주춤하는 사이 너무 과하게 빠졌던 코스닥으로 급격하게 자금이 쏠리며 급반등이 나오고 있음 ​ 美 약해진 고용체력에… 한풀 꺾인 '가을 금리인상'(머니투데이) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/008/0005397502?sid=104 : 미국 7월 고용 지표가 쇼크로 나옴. 비농업부문 일자

9 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈2,500 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 일주일을 돌아보는 리포트 정리(8월 2주차) - 리포트 정리는 아래 블로그 링크를 통해 확인 가능합니다 https://blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224373292458 1. 8월 전략: 코스피는 무엇으로 반등할까 (하나 이재만) 2. 호텔신라: 실적 날아오르다 (IBK 남성현) 3. 두산 - SK실트론 인수 완료 코멘트: 반도체 슈퍼사이클 본격 합류 (메리츠 양승수) 4. 화장품: K-Beauty로 아침을 시작하는 전 세계 미녀들 (IBK 조경진) 5. 에이피알: 브랜드사 중 밸류에이션이 가장 싸 (한국투자 김명주) 6. 2차전지 Weekly: 3가지 키워드 집중 (하나 김현수) 7. 삼미금속: 정밀가공 확장을 통한 성장성 확보 (키움 김학준) 8. 오스테오닉: 실적 성장에 더해질 주가

9 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 15 August 2026

*** NNN 2026 Weekly(26.08.07)_PC 및 엑셀 파일 오류로 업데이트 쉬겠습니다.

9 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

■ 주간 Global ETF Flow (26.08.07) * DRAM(Roundhill Memory ETF) 데이터 추가 ** 단순 AUM FLOW / AUM 으로 비율 계산하기 때문에 AUM 가격 상승으로 인한 실제 FLOW 비율 달리 보일 수 있음 ​ - SPY(S&P500) AUM -1.82% (1M %) - EWY(MSCI South Korea) AUM +6.06% (1M +30.59%) - DRAM(Roundhill Memory ETF) AUM +2.52% (1M +34.88%) ​ ​ ■ SPY vs EWY (26.08.07) ​ - SPY 주간 수익률 +3.51% - SPY 1M 수익률 +2.43% - EWY 주간 수익률 +5.72% - EWY 1M 수익률 -9.50% https://blog.naver.com/beatthemkt

9 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,240 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

■ 주간 회사별 지분보고서 제출 상황 (26.08.07) * 5% 이상 신규보고(대량보유보고 기준 증감률 순) 1) 해성디에스, 제이피모건에셋매니지먼트아시아퍼시픽리미티드, +5.22% 2) 신성이엔지, 제이피모건시큐리티즈피엘씨, +5.14% 3) 두산밥캣, 실체스터인터내셔널인베스터즈엘엘피, +5.05% 4) 대주전자재료, 삼성자산운용, +5.04% 5) 브이엠, 제이피모건시큐리티즈피엘씨, +4.56% 6) 삼화콘덴서, 제이피모건시큐리티즈피엘씨, +4.32% 7) 글로벌텍스프리, 미리캐피탈매니지먼트엘엘씨, +0.96% 8) 이엔에프테크놀로지, 미리캐피탈매니지먼트엘엘씨, +0.50% 9) 지엔씨에너지, 브이아이피자산운용, +0.42% 10) 파크시스템스, CapitalResearchandManagementCompany, +0.14% 11) 알테

7 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.07) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224371336498) 이란 호르무즈 통항 제한 초안에 놀란 유가...브렌트 82달러 다시 반등(파이낸셜뉴스) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/014/0005558478?sid=104 후티, 사우디 본토 공격…중동 '제2전선' 현실화(노컷뉴스) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/079/0004176408?sid=104 : 호르무즈 해협이 이란-오만 간 합의로 완전히 개방될 것으로 기대되었으나 미국과 이스라엘 관련 선박은 통행을 제한하겠다고 이란이 언급하는 등 여전히 노이즈가 발생 중. 후티 반군이 사우디를 공격했다는 보도도 나오며 확전 우려까

6 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈2,620 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.06) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224370311485) 이란 "호르무즈 새 항로 합의…상당부분 이란 영해 통과"(연합뉴스) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/001/0016236235?sid=104 : 이란은 미국은 아니지만 오만과 호르무즈 항로 합의를 진행하며 해협 일부 개방 소식이 들려옴. 이로 인해 유가 및 금리는 계속해서 안정되는 추세 지속. 다만 아직 미국과 이란의 완전한 합의는 아님 ​ ‘증시 안정되고 있다’ 발언 후 시장은 ‘매도 사이트카’(매일경제) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/009/0005717371?sid=101 : 오늘 우리 시장은 삼성전자와 SK하

5 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈3,000 viewsread 15 August 2026

■ 우산 X NNN Pick 하루를 돌아보는 뉴스 정리 (08.05) (https://m.blog.naver.com/s1kkw/224369108802) 트럼프 “호르무즈 곧 열린다”…美·이란, 48시간 내 합의 기대(헤럴드경제) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/016/0002679922?sid=104 : 트럼프가 이란과의 합의가 임박했다고 언급. 여러 차례 비슷한 방식으로 타코를 하고 있지만 여전히 시장은 해당 뉴스 플로우에 맞춰 변동성을 보여주고 있음. 어쨌든 협상 임박 뉴스에 금리와 유가 모두 안정화 ​ "한국 투자 부적격" 블룸버그 칼럼에 금융위 정면 반박(이데일리) https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/018/0006344750?sid=101 : 블룸버그에 엄청난

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @WoosanXNNN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“우산 X NNN의 아이디어” (@WoosanXNNN), 12,101 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WoosanXNNN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.