Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day

Channel
Gemeinsam stark
@Wissen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,677subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001101819845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Wissen |
| Description | Hier in diesem Kanal sprechen wir über Alles,denn Alles ist miteinander verbunden |
| Created | 12 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Wissen |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 1,677 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 1,677 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 17 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈41,800
- Videos
- ≈21,300
- Links
- ≈42,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 10m
- Average length
- 32m 41s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
54 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 26 | 48.1% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 44.4% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2023 to 19 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Dreieckige Schiffe wurden in den Küstengewässern der Vereinigten Staaten entdeckt. Die US-Marine hat Sonardaten erhalten, die auf mysteriöse, sich schnell bewegende Unterwasserobjekte hinweisen. Weltexperten können das nicht erklären, aber sie alle sagen eines: Die Menschen verfügen nicht über solche Technologien . Es gibt aber auch die Theorie, dass es sich hierbei um eine geheime Technologie zur Krümmung von Raum…
❤13👍7
🌎Die Waffe gegen Spikeproteine? Wie Nattokinase unser Herz unterstützt! Die regelmäßige Einnahme von Nattokinase durch den Verzehr von Natto ist möglicherweise ein Grund für die niedrige Rate von Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen und die hohe Lebenserwartung in Okinawa. Nattokinase hilft, Blutgerinnsel aufzulösen und vorzubeugen, den Blutdruck zu normalisieren und die Blutgefäße sauber zu halten. Darüber hinaus hat es g…
❤3
Geburtswehen Das ist das Wort was ich bekomme, wenn ich die Plasmaauswürfe sehe. @katebono
👍5❤2
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
💥💥💥💥💥 Chris Miller sagt, dass in Palästina und Israel derzeit zwei Kriege gleichzeitig geführt werden. -Einer, im Untergrund, gegen die Kinderhändlern. -Ein anderer, in der Luft, um Großisrael zu schaffen. Irgendwann werden die beiden aufeinander treffen. __ Im Moment werden im Nahen Osten zwei Kriege geführt: 1. Krieg gegen den Kindersexhandel. 2. Der Krieg Israels zur Schaffung von Groß-Israel. Einer aus de…
👍8❤1
Dank AKASHA-Familie jetzt: die auf deutsch gesprochene Version zu "THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH" Dank an Quelle: Deutsche Geschichtsrichtigstellung (telegram)
❤1
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
Video, posted without a caption
❤3
Die unsagbare Kraft der natürlichen Wirbel 👍😁💦
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Wissen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 753,782 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@akasha_tv · 28,9251 postBewusst-Vegan-Froh 🍎
@bewusst_vegan_froh · 31,7841 postHolistische Gesundheit
@HolistischeGesundheitHeilung · 113,8801 postInMir
@In_Mir · 2,7461 postKarl´s Lachkanal
@karlslachkana · 3,4991 postKateBonoAwake
@KateBono · 27,3921 post(Übersicht) Naturprodukte - Gesund leben 💞
@Naturprodukte17 · 2,2951 post⚡️Q+++⚡️
@QPLUSPLUSPLUS · 52,7921 postThe Collectors
@TheCollectorwissenswert · 1711 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Wissen named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gemeinsam stark” (@Wissen), 1,677 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wissen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.