Channel
@VoicesOfIEA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
256subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003888297258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VoicesOfIEA |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 14 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VoicesOfIEA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 256 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:20 | 255 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 254 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,696 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
75 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 42.7% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 30.7% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 20.0% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/i/status/2083961337219072133 So, lately Pakistan has been trying to organise several groups for armed rebellion against the IEA: something is definitely going on, after the attack in Badakhshan and the sudden profileration of announcements of new groups' constitutions. Taqi usmani has been saying that any form of rebellion against Pakistan is prohibited because Pakistan is supposedly an "Islamic State…
👌1👍1
https://x.com/i/status/2083619554207383568 Not an endorsement of the liberal ikhwani Obaidullah, but he's spot on here. So first of all the statement about "sharing DNA" was a mistranslation: 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗮 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗘𝗿𝗿𝗼𝗿 𝗟𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 "𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗗𝗡𝗔 𝗜𝘀 𝗢𝗻𝗲" 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝗾𝘂𝗼𝘁𝗲 The Taliban's Minister of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock, Mawlawi Attaullah Omari, was widely misquoted during his visit to India as saying, "Our DNA is one.…
💯1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥7
An honor to host the Pakistan Ministry of Interior, Mohsin Naqvi, here at Headquarters – the @FBI deeply appreciates their support as 𝐰𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐔𝐒 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐧(Colonized brown subjects). Important discussion surrounding facilitating resources and specialized training to combat counterterrorism financing and cyber investigations both at home and abroad. Our partnership is critical and we look forward to m…
❤2🤩1🤯1
Syllabus of Afghan madaris
❤4
File, posted without a caption
❤4
👆
وصف الصحفي أحمد فال الدين الموريتاني لحركة الطلبة بعد أن أجرى عدة مقابلات مع قياداتها والمقربين من الملا:
❤5
Every time a "controversial" ruling (I.e., anything not aligned to western norms and sensitivities) from Afghanistan reaches the news, it's always the same: "Muh that's not from Islam, that's CuLtUrE, backwards Pashtunwali tribal laws, Hindu-influenced subcontinental Deobandism". -No, it's actually standard Hanafi fiqh as clearly discussed in all these pre-deobandi works from Arab lands, Ottoman and Central Asian a…
💯5
Western NGOs, liberals, feminists and ikhwano-salafees (yeah, they all basically share the same objections and are on the same boat as far as societal engineering is concerned) don't (just) have an issue with the Taliban and the Islamic Emirate; they have an issue with classical traditional Islam in and of itself. Classical traditional Islam of which the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is the only contemporary manife…
💯5
See how openly they articulate their plan of nifaq of "convincing (fooling) Muslims with Islamic-sounding arguments to feed them the same kafir social engineering slop, but by (mis)quoting some Islamic concepts and terms and while wearing a foulard 🧕". This has been the freemasonic dajjalic agenda started with Afghani-Abduh-Rida and their "salafee-izlamist" movement: deist rationalist positivist secularist murtaddin…
💯5
The mayor (Wali) of Herat, Mawlawi Nur Ahmad Islam Jar, explains the rules and regulations when it comes to detaining women; According to the rules and regulations, male law enforcement agents are not allowed to touch a woman. We have an experienced female team, who are skilled in law enforcement, who travel in a special vehicle that is tinted for privacy, so that the one being detained can feel comfortable and the…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VoicesOfIEA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 275,033 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Voices of the IEA” (@VoicesOfIEA), 256 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VoicesOfIEA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.