Channel
@shrikant_kadam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,918subscribers
-1,324 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001475915674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shrikant_kadam |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shrikant_kadam |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 25,918 | -16 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:55 | 25,934 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:21 | 25,953 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:49 | 25,964 | -17 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 25,981 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 25,993 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 26,005 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 26,008 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 26,021 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 26,026 | -25 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:18 | 26,051 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 26,060 | -12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 26,072 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 26,084 | -20 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 26,104 | -5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 26,109 | -21 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:47 | 26,130 | -6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 26,136 | -36 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 26,172 | -64 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 03:42 | 26,236 | first reading |
239 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 239 (28 July 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 331,860 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Oct 2026, 06:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🪔🔥 DIWALI MEGA ADMISSION OFFER 🔥🪔 📢 शेअर मार्केट शिकण्याची योग्य वेळ आता आली आहे! 📈 तुम्ही शेअर मार्केट शिकण्याचा विचार करत आहात? पण अजूनही सुरुवात केली नाही? 🎯 तर ही संधी तुमच्यासाठीच आहे! 🎁 दिवाळी स्पेशल 20% OFF 💰 नियमित फी: ₹6,999 🔥 दिवाळी ऑफर फी: फक्त ₹5,599! 📚 एकाच कोर्समध्ये शेअर मार्केटच्या विविध विषयांचे शिक्षण! ✅ योग्य मार्गदर्शन ✅ मार्केट समजून घेण्यावर भर ✅ स्वतःचे विश्लेषण करण्यासाठी आवश्यक ज्ञान …
159.80 🔥🔥🔥🔥
148 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
आपण दिलेल्या सर्व Call आणि put दिलेल्या Entry पासून सर्व लेवल प्रॉपर पूर्ण केल्या आहेत
🔥🔥🔥🔥
निफ्टी 23100 च्या वरती जाऊन 15मिनिट ची कँडल स्टेबल होते तर निफ्टी 50 पॉईंट तरी वरती फिरू शकतो
Photo, posted without a caption
23050 Put 123 च्या वरती गेला तरच तो Active होईल आणि पुढील लेवल घेण्याचा प्रयत्न करेल
Photo, posted without a caption
🔴🔴 📢 महत्त्वाची सूचना 🔴🔴 सर्वाना कळविण्यात येते की, क्लासची फी लवकरच वाढविण्यात येणार आहे. त्यामुळे इच्छुक विद्यार्थ्यांनी वाढीव फी लागू होण्यापूर्वी आपला प्रवेश निश्चित करावा. धन्यवाद!
130 To 197💣💣💣💣
Showing the 12 most recent of 239 posts we hold for @shrikant_kadam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shrikant Kadam And Associates” (@shrikant_kadam), 25,918 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shrikant_kadam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.