Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Голоса из Поднебесной

@VerlinMerlin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

443subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002335607120
TypeChannel
Username@VerlinMerlin
DescriptionРазвенчивая стереотипы и опираясь на квалифицированную и инсайдерскую экспертизу. а еще отслеживая наиболее интересные и актуальные публикации в СМИ, а также в китайской блогосфере. тг канал о Китае
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/VerlinMerlin

Growth

4437 Aug 2026, 14:17 — 443 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:04 — 443 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:178 Aug 2026, 05:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 442–444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:04443no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:17443first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.49%
avg views ÷ 443 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total752
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
552
Videos
268
Links
2,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
225.0%
🔥225.0%
👏112.5%
😁112.5%
😱112.5%
🤔112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

СМИ: Россия просила Китай прекратить называть Волгоград иероглифами, означающими «город Сталина». Китай отказался https://share.google/5G84SuTiRlYyWVcXq

🤔1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @daokedaoPhoto

Джека Ма обозвали еврейской собакой. Китайские патриоты возмущены, что он инвестировал 30 миллионов долларов в Corgi - американский стартап в сфере коммерческого страхования, использующий искусственный интеллект. 🇨🇳 Китайская угроза

😱1

7 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC34 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ejdailyru

Громкий звук, который слышали жители Москвы и ряда районов Московской области, был вызван пролетом самолета, который перешел на сверхзвуковую скорость, рассказал источник РБК, близкий к оперативным службам. @ejdailyru

6 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC50 viewsread 8 August 2026

Китай приступил к строительству транспортного кольца длиной 27 тысяч километров Власти Китая представили масштабный проект создания единого транспортного кольца, которое пройдет вдоль сухопутных границ и морского побережья страны. Реализация проекта намечена на период 15-го пятилетнего плана (2026–2030 годы).

6 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC43 viewsread 8 August 2026

В порядке демонстрации своей силы осуществлять космическое наблюдение недавно запущенный китайский спутник отследил падение куска ракеты SpaceX Falcon 9 на Луну и снял запись её удара. На снимках, которые, по-видимому, показывают момент удара, не видно видимого шлейфа, что соответствует тому, что сообщили другие учёные и телескопы сразу после удара ракетных обломков в среду. Китайский спутник для мониторинга космичес

6 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026

Большой халявы трудящиеся в Китае от власти не получают. Хотя сегодня отпуска заметно длиннее, чем до реформ (тогда их практически не было). https://t.me/daokedao/44812

6 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC32 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @daokedao

Интересно, «Российская газета» или «Труд» имеют какой-то бакшиш от китайских партнеров или задарма их печатают? В Российской газете целый раздел «Россия - Китай», материалы в котором по большей части перепечатки с китайских СМИ. А в Труде «Окно в Китай» аналогичной направленности. Остальные российские СМИ в этом отношении тоже не отстают. Пекин платит американским медиагигантам за публикацию своей пропаганды. Сог

6 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026

Больно укусила КУ апологетов российско-китайской дружбы: https://t.me/daokedao/44817

6 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SergdfcEfimsaPhoto

Вчера была дата. 5 августа 1966 года, ровно шестьдесят лет назад, Мао Цзэдун выдвинул свой знаменитый лозунг «Огонь по штабам» (паода сылинбу), который фактически положил начало Культурной революции в Китае. Дацзыбао, которое написал лично председатель Мао, был озвучен во время 11-го пленума ЦК Коммунистической партии Китая 9-го созыва. Он включал в себя критику партийного аппарата Компартии Китая, который обвинялс

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @daokedao

Китай закрывает офшорные налоговые лазейки. Пекин усиливает давление на состоятельных граждан, имеющих зарубежные активы, которые находятся в иностранных трастах, а также получаемый с них доход. Они теперь будут облагаться подоходным налогом с физических лиц. За этим шагом стоит не столько стремление к большей налоговой справедливости, сколько задача пополнить государственные финансы. В течение многих лет власти пр

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VerlinMerlin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Голоса из Поднебесной” (@VerlinMerlin), 443 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VerlinMerlin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.