Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

WV: Why Vegan?

@VeganLeftie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

403subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002203156437
TypeChannel
Username@VeganLeftie
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VeganLeftie

Growth

400403401.56 August 2026 — 401 subscribers6 August 2026 — 400 subscribers6 August 2026 — 400 subscribers14 August 2026 — 403 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 400–403 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:56403+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:45400no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:45400-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:51401first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.4%
avg views ÷ 403 subscribers
Avg views / post
179
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,324
Reactions total207
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

207 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7636.7%
🔥4220.3%
❤‍🔥3918.8%
👍157.25%
💔146.76%
💯94.35%
💘41.93%
😭31.45%
🥰31.45%
🤔10.483%
🤣10.483%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC106 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, важное объявление! На волне успеха сбора на перевод книги я решил пойти на ещё один смелый (наглый?) шаг. Давно хочу сделать полноценный видеоразбор высказываний Станислава Дробышевского. Популярному популяризатору солидный ответ. Не желаете ли поучаствовать в сборе средств на создание этого ролика? Конкретно: 1) ресёрч; 2) сценарий; 3) съёмка; 4) монтаж; 5) кринж (самая дорогая статья если что) Без шуток

29❤‍🔥2🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC149 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Та-дам! Первый на канале книжный видеообзор прибыл! https://youtu.be/zHmIjmQR9NE?si=3lUX-EPtQ-OqM9rb Любит ли человек животных? В чём это проявляется? Проходит ли человек так называемую "проверку животными"? Есть ли животные, которых можно есть и использовать? Рассказываю кратко о содержании книги, интересных моментах, хвалю лучшие мысли и ругаю странные и дурацкие (да, они есть, хотя книга вроде как веганская...)

❤‍🔥134👍2

2 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC178 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Про новый ролик сказал, а старый не упомянул — непорядок. https://youtu.be/qQaE9NfMk4M?si=cySILY7LwehxmdSC

👍10🥰3❤‍🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC174 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Маленькая сводка: 📘 завершён монтаж обзора книги "Как любить животных" Генри Манса. Выйдет завтра. 🤙скоро начну монтаж двухчасового реакта. 👮 кто в курсе, кто нет, но сейчас некоторые области интернета бурлят вокруг Александра Панчина. Некогда популярный Валентин Конон выпустил целых три ролика с критикой своего бывшего товарища. Недавно он их объединил и выложил на основной канал. Я вижу в этом повод сделать нов

🔥92❤‍🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC164 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @veganbirderPhoto

#bird_art Завершу на этом работу над птыцом. Решил назвать его Корвокс Туманохвост🪶 Птица, которую встретить не очень просто. Днём вряд ли у кого-то получится, но в сумерки и ночью шанс есть, и почти исключительно в лесу. Больше всего выделяется, конечно, своим невероятным хвостом, что развевается роскошным чёрным туманом и может тянуться от птицы на расстояние до двух метров. На голове у Корвокса густые "усы" и у

11❤‍🔥5💘4

31 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC155 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кайфово придумывать животных, зная, что их если кто и сможет эксплуатировать, то лишь в художественных произведениях. Тем более что можно написать такое произведение, где эти животные с лёгкостью дают крепкий отпор незваным людишками-спесишистам.

10

29 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC207 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

400 подписчиков! Это дело непостоянное, запросто могут человек пять отписаться сразу после этого поста. По классической схеме "О, пост — давно хотел отписаться, спасибо"🙃 Не осуждаю, тоже так делаю иногда. Но всем, кто читает, смотрит, комментирует (не считая токсиков и неадекватов) — СПАСИБО! Для тех, кто присоединился недавно, или тех, кто раньше, но ещё не очень читал канал, соберу доп инфу про себя, ибо я не од

🔥19❤‍🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 09:16 UTC200 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Представляю вам слайд, перехваченный из презентации инноватора, который через пару лет испытает откровение и решит, что защищать чувства растений это вчерашний день и пора наконец перейти на веганство встать на защиту чувств грибов

💔12❤‍🔥1🤣1

27 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC220 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В Соединённом Королевстве новый премьер-министр Энди Бёрнэм, и Эд Винтерс не преминул это прокомментировать в контексте будущей линии власти в отношении животных. Читать в целом грустно, так как речь по большей части о велферистской возне: запрет на использование CO2 для умерщвления свиней, отказ от групповых клеток для кур-несушек и прочее. Премьер как будто бы на прогрессивном вайбе, даже признаёт благополучие не

💯9😭3💔2

26 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC180 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Только что дочитал ОТЛИЧНЕЙШУЮ книгу, от которой не смог удержаться. Всё-таки количество информации в "Необъятном мире" Эда Йонга, ну... Почти необъятно. Сделал перерыв на эту. Через некоторое время напишу краткую и очень полезную выжимку идей этой книжки. Супер вдохновляет, круче большинства представителей self-help!

15

26 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC200 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @OutspokenAtheistSoulPhoto

Последний пост был почти год назад. Бывает, что сказать. Надо проще подходить к ведению канала, особенно учитывая, что он у меня далеко не один💀 Так или иначе хотел быстро поделиться небольшим ресентиментом, уж простите. Ну или просто выразить досаду. От религиозных лиц иногда можно услышать формулировку "Мы/Я/Церковь/Ислам/Религия не отрицает науку". Что мне не нравится? Ну, сначала можно сказать, что за этой ф

❤‍🔥7👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @VeganLeftie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 154,992 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WV: Why Vegan?” (@VeganLeftie), 403 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VeganLeftie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.