Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anshul Bhatt AIR 22

Channel

Anshul Bhatt AIR 22

@anshulbhattias

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,653subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116798653
TypeChannel
Username@anshulbhattias
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anshulbhattias

Growth

13,65313,69613,674.518 August 2026 — 13,694 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,695 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,691 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,692 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,696 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,687 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,679 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,678 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,681 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,679 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,666 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,661 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,655 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,658 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,653 subscribers18 August 20263 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,647–13,702 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 14:3713,653-5
2 Sept 2026, 07:1313,658+3
31 Aug 2026, 02:5713,655-6
30 Aug 2026, 04:1613,661-5
29 Aug 2026, 03:4913,666-13
28 Aug 2026, 00:3413,679-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:3813,681+3
26 Aug 2026, 02:1113,678-1
25 Aug 2026, 01:5513,679-8
23 Aug 2026, 17:3613,687-9
22 Aug 2026, 03:5813,696+4
20 Aug 2026, 22:2413,692+1
19 Aug 2026, 21:3713,691-4
18 Aug 2026, 23:5213,695+1
18 Aug 2026, 20:3113,694first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,179 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46539.4%
😁44137.4%
💔1149.67%
🔥857.21%
👏453.82%
👍191.61%
🥰100.848%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2026, 08:26 UTC≈7,550 views130 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🔐 This message can be delivered

😁9221💔7🔥6👏4

16 Jun 2026, 07:14 UTC≈11,200 views196 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ⓘ This message can not be delivered

😁154💔32🔥43👏3

15 Jun 2026, 17:56 UTC≈11,900 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026

And to those who could not, my message is this "And if a god will wreck me yet again on the wine-dark sea, I can bear that too, with a spirit tempered to endure. Much have I suffered, laboured long and hard by now in the waves and wars. Add this to the total — bring the trial on!" - Odysseus, Odyssey https://youtu.be/yS3foMsNeRE?si=pk723pxWMrG7SU9_

27👏3🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC≈9,530 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Congratulations to all those who made it.

13

15 Jun 2026, 11:43 UTC≈10,100 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Just putting it out there again. My only advice to you is that don't make an exam, the exam of your self-worth. All the best 💪

67👏7💔1🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC≈10,100 views76 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

अन्तक मां प्रति मा दृशमेनां क्रोधकरालतमां विनिधेहि | शङ्करसेवनचिन्तनधीरो भीषण भैरव शक्तिमयोऽस्मि ४ Oh Antaka, Lord of Death! Do not cast your awful look on me. Oh Brave who always thinks of serving the Lord Shankara. Oh mighty Bhairava, Lord of creation, sustenance and destruction, give me the strength.

66👏5👍3🔥2

15 Jun 2026, 11:40 UTC≈8,000 views68 reactionsread 2 September 2026

All the best for results 💪 💯 #har_ghar_insider_yojna

😁546💔6🔥2

15 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC≈8,200 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Those who are planning to appear for Uttarakhand PCS 2026 can join this group for preparation, guided by this year's selected candidate of Uttarakhand PCS: https://t.me/UKPSCLowerandUpperPCS

11👏1💔1

11 Jun 2026, 06:35 UTC≈12,900 views111 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Prelims Result scenes

😁73💔275👏4🔥1🥰1

8 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC≈11,100 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

μολὼν λαβέ Molon labe "Come and take them" (Leonidas's response to Xerxes's when he demand that the Spartan army lay down their weapons and surrender to the Persian army during the second Persian invasion of Greece.)

31🔥8👍1💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anshulbhattias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Aaditya Pandey (AIR 48, UPSC CSE 2022)
@aadityaadvait · 38,786
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
Upsc Art & Culture Mcq
@art_and_culture_mcq · 41,654
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
UPSC Ethics by VK IAS
@Upsc_ethics_notes · 44,489
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
CSLIVE Group_UPSC
@cslivegroup · 55,429
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
UPSC PCS Notes 2027
@upscpcsnotes26 · 34,286
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Upsc Economy Mcq
@prelims_economy_mcqs · 44,500
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 28 August 2026
UPSC POLITY MCQS PRELIMS PYQ
@Upsc_Prelims_Polity_Mcqs · 37,345
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
Upsc Government Schemes Mcq
@upsc_government_scheme_mcq · 41,684
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
UPSC international relations MCQ
@upsc_ir_mcq · 40,981
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Aditya Srivastava AIR 1 UPSC CSE 2023
@aditya297ias · 33,571
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Internal Security UPSC
@internal_security_upsc_MAINS · 36,778
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
CSE Updates
@csp20info · 51,842
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Upsc science and technology Mcqs
@upsc_sci_tech_mcq · 41,063
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
PWOnlyIAS Official
@PWOnlyiasofficial · 80,805
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Mehak Jain, AIR 17 : Notes and Strategy
@mehak_jainAIR17 · 59,502
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
IASExam-Congress
@IASExamcongress · 38,839
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
UPSC history MCQs
@upsc_prelims_history_mcq · 47,515
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
IAS Gaurav budania
@Gaurav_Budania_IAS_AIR_13 · 48,655
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anshul Bhatt AIR 22” (@anshulbhattias), 13,653 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anshulbhattias.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.