Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

real.UN.real

@VadPanov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

784subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716037313
TypeChannel
Username@VadPanov
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VadPanov

Growth

783784783.56 August 2026 — 784 subscribers6 August 2026 — 783 subscribers6 August 2026 — 783 subscribers13 August 2026 — 784 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 783–784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:16784+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:35783no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:51783-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:22784first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.2%
avg views ÷ 784 subscribers
Avg views / post
464
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held15 (20 April 202624 July 2026)
Views total928
Reactions total92
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

604 reactions across 15 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥23639.1%
13722.7%
👍9014.9%
😁274.47%
😱162.65%
💯152.48%
🤬152.48%
👏111.82%
👀91.49%
❤‍🔥81.32%
🍌81.32%
🌭71.16%
🤝40.662%
🫡40.662%
👎30.497%
🙏30.497%
🐳20.331%
😢20.331%
🍾10.166%
🎃10.166%
5 further kinds50.828%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 604reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC359 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Уже скоро... уже совсем скоро... уже этой осенью...))) Добро пожаловать в ближайшее будущее. В мир, где нейросети управляют машинами, производством, общественным порядком и даже телом человека. В мир, где каждый обрёл право на Вечность, право обмануть смерть - записав себя в виде единиц и нулей, и превратившись в цифровую личность. В нейра. Всё помнящего. Всё знающего. Всё умеющего. Способного жить в любом устройств

🔥41👍1513❤‍🔥3🌭1🍾1🐳1🤮1

19 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC569 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тур лузеров чемпионата мира предсказуемо превратился в весёленькую товарищескую встречу по футбольному реслингу, в которой каждый получил то, чего хотел: одни добрались до вожделенных медалек ЧМ (хоть третий сорт, но не брак), о которых грезили с 1966 года, когда азербайджанец Тофик Бахрамов зафиксировал гол, которого не было; а другие получили весомый повод для раскрутки "легенды". Скушно. Настоящий футбол будет сег

😁16

13 Jun 2026, 05:40 UTC860 views70 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Книжный фестиваль "Красная Площадь" прошёл, а самый летний триллер "В сумерках моря" - остался...))) *а в начале осени выйдет новая книга... но это - секрет)))

🔥3817👍11👀2🌭1🍌1

5 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC979 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

*вторая фотография - с работы, до сих пор при воспоминании о том рейсе неуютно делается…))))

🔥18😁9🌭1🍌1👍1😈1

5 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC839 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Но время шло, новое поколение работников американской культуры занялось переосмыслением традиционных ценностей и в рамках тотального продвижения толерантности, оно (поколение) решило экранизировать первую иллюстрацию к данной записи. Картинку, которую в своё время, публика воспринимала исключительно с хохотом. Никто и представить не мог, что смелые сценаристы (режиссёры, продюсеры) настолько творчески подойдут к обра

👍11👀5🔥32🌭1🍌1🐳1

5 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC468 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Давным-давно, в те благословенные времена, когда под словом "интернет" понимали отрывок из романа Гибсона, а сети плели пауки и рыбаки, я впервые посмотрел фильм "Чужой", в котором группа простых космонавтов сталкивается с инфернальным злом. Даже так: с инфернальным Злом. С абсолютно враждебной, трудноубиваемой, не идущей ни на какие переговоры формой жизни. Образ Чужого, в отличие, например, от образа Хищника, не по

👍155🌭1🍌1👀1

3 Jun 2026, 13:50 UTC457 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вам кажется, что в воскресенье после обеда в Москве делать нечего? Ещё как есть чего!) Приходите на Красную площадь - будет весело…)))

🔥2210👍4👏2🌭1🍌1👀1

28 May 2026, 09:46 UTC873 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А тем временем, на Кинопоиске можно посмотреть первый тизер... https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/8613334/video/212265/

🔥3012❤‍🔥4👍4🍌3🌭1

21 May 2026, 10:36 UTC843 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @darkzotovland

Однажды Георгий судился с ТВ по причине того, что у него из блога стащили видео. В январе 2025 года по каналу «Россия» показали три видео из бывших нацистских концлагерей Освенцима и Майданека, с фейковой информацией, что «они сняты активистами». Собственно, эти видео были украдены из телеграм-канала Георгия DarkZotovLand, и никакого разрешения на трансляцию он не давал. Ситуация вообще прекрасна. Государственный к

😱16🤬156🤝4🫡4😢2🎃1👎1

11 May 2026, 14:34 UTC817 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @books_bestsellers_astPhoto

🌃 Лиза и «(Бес)человечность» Вадима Панова 📚 Читай-город 📚 Book24 📚 Литрес 🛍 Ozon #новинка

👍127🔥5👏4😍1

9 May 2026, 11:05 UTC721 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lomovkaaVideo

«Есть только миг» к 9 Мая. Глубже, чем просто песня. Больше, чем просто клип. Поют Валерия, Akmal', Асия и Антон Лавреньтев. Песня, написанная к кинофильму «Земля Санникова», сегодня звучит как разговор с новой реальностью. «Призрачно все в этом мире бушующем» — мы это кожей чувствуем, как когда-то чувствовали наши деды. Они тоже жили в момент, когда все могло оборваться в секунду. И выстояли. В День Победы эта пе

13🔥8👍4🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @VadPanov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 450,375 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“real.UN.real” (@VadPanov), 784 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VadPanov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.