Ludwig Göransson - Can You Hear The Music (OST Oppenheimer) P.S. “Оппенгеймер” фильмини фақат кинотеатрда кўринг. Ўзгача ҳис қолдирувчи бу имконият қайта бўлмаслиги мумкин. @UzIMDb
🔥10❤4👍3🐳1🤯1

Channel
@UzIMDb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
458subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001362075428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UzIMDb |
| Description | Кино оламига бошқача назар Каналда асосан таҳлиллар ёзиб борилади. R (17+) Админ: @paradoxn1 Letterboxd: boxd.it/2DPPV |
| Created | 6 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UzIMDb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 458 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 458 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
210 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 76 | 36.2% | |
| 👍 | 56 | 26.7% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 19.5% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 7.62% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.476% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2021 to 30 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ludwig Göransson - Can You Hear The Music (OST Oppenheimer) P.S. “Оппенгеймер” фильмини фақат кинотеатрда кўринг. Ўзгача ҳис қолдирувчи бу имконият қайта бўлмаслиги мумкин. @UzIMDb
🔥10❤4👍3🐳1🤯1
Америка Прометейи: 3 йил. 2 миллиард доллар. 1 лойиҳа. Ушбу таҳлилда "Oppenheimer" фильмига Спойлерлар мавжуд. 1945-йил 16-июль, 5:29:21, Лос-Аламос, Тринити тести. Тарихда кескин бурилиш ясаган атом бомбасининг муваффақиятли синови бир давлатга бошқа давлатлар устидан мисли кўрилмаган устунлик берган: энди бир неча соат ичида миллионлаб инсонлар ҳаётига нуқта қўйиш мумкин. Бундай "қудрат узуги"га эга бўлган дав…
❤13👍4🔥1
Бугун барча даврларнинг энг яхши режиссёри Кристофер Ноланнинг туғилган куни. Ўзгача услубга эга режиссёрнинг фильмографияси қуидагилардан иборат: • Кузатиш (1998) • Мементо (2000) • Инсомния (2002) • Бетмен: Ибтидо (2005) • Престиж (2006) • Қора Рицар (2008) • Муқаддима (2010) • Қора Рицар: Афсонанинг қайтиши (2012) • Интерстеллар (2014) • Дюнкерк (2017) • Ақида (2020) • Оппенгеймер (2023) @UzIMDb
🔥10❤🔥4👍1
"Фабельманлар" Фильм 7 та номинациядан биронтасида ҳам ғолиб бўла олмади. "Фақат Оскар учун ишланган" фильм ҳеч нарса юта олмагани қизиқ ҳолат)
😁16🔥6👍4👎4💩3🌚1🤮1
“Ғарбий фронтда ўзгариш йўқ” Барча кутганидай, энг яхши хорижий фильм бўлди ва жами 9 номинациядан яна 3 ҳайкалчани қўлга киритди.
🔥15👍2
“Барчаси. Ҳар жойда. Бир вақтда.” Фильм 11 номинациядан 7 та Оскар ҳайкалчасини қўлга киритди. Бунда асосий 5 категориядан номзоди қўйилган барча 4 таласини ҳам ютиб чиқди. Совринларига ҳақиқий муносиб шедевр фильм.
🔥16👍1
Оскар 2023: Кутилмалар ва Муносиблар (объективликка даъво қилинмайди) Ўтган йил давомида бир неча ўнлаб яхши фильмлар чиқарилди. Қуйида “Оскар-2023” номинантлари орасида менга энг маъқул келганлари ҳақида дайжест. Энг яхши: • Фильм - “Барчаси. Ҳар жойда. Бир вақтда.” • Режиссёр - Дэниэллар (Барчаси. Ҳар жойда. Бир вақтда.) • Актёр - Брендан Фрейзер (Кит) • Актриса - Мишель Йео (Барчаси. Ҳар жойда. Бир вақтда.…
👍8❤2🍾2🔥2
2/2 Словик нега Маргога унинг ортиқчалигини айтди? Нега фақат Марго оролдан тирик кета олди? Бу, менимча, "идеал" меню учун қурбонликка танланган мижозлар Етти Ўлимли Гуноҳлар билан боғлангани сабаб эди. Мижозларга берилган сирларни-ошкор-қилувчи тортилла (Taco Tueusday) буни аниқлашга ёрдам бера олади. Ғазаб (Ira) - Шеф ва унинг жамоаси. Қониқмас мижозлар Шефнинг овқат пиширишга бўлган иштиёқини ўлдиргани учун б…
🔥10👍3❤🔥2❤1😢1
Абсурдлик санъати "— Марго, илтимос, ҳозир сигарет чекма. Бу сенинг там билиш қобилиятингни ўлдиради. — Унда таъм билиш қобилиятим бахтли тарзда ўлади." Ушбу таҳлил давомида "Меню" (The Menu) фильмига Спойлерлар мавжуд. Ижодкор инсон учун ўзи яратган нарсаларда қониқиш ҳиссини туймаслик, ўз қизиқишларига нисбатан иштиёқни йўқолиб бориши - У учун ўлимдан ҳам ёмонроқ ҳолатдир. "Меню" фильми эса ушбу ҳолатни мукамм…
👍9🔥6❤4
2021 йил дайжести Пандемия сабаб кечиктирилган премьералар ҳисобига, бу йилнинг оҳирги чорагида жуда кўп яхши кинолар чиқди. Қуйида 2021 йилдаги менга энг ёққан 10 та фильмни улашаман. (Хронологик тартибда) Кислород (Oxygen) 6.5/10 Клаустрафобик атмосферага эга илмий-тўқима жанридаги бу фильм экзистенциализм ва ҳаёт учун кураш мавзуларини яхши очиб берган. ШР: 8 Сўнгги дуэл (The Last Duel) 7.5/10 Рашомон эфф…
👍10❤6😱1
Французча хабарнома: журналистларга севги мактуби Кино оламидаги “замонавий санъат” даҳоси - Вес Андерсоннинг ушбу фильми шахсий имзо ва элементлар билан шу даражада юксаклик билан очиб берилганки, томошабин беиҳтиёр кинонинг идеал атмосферасига кириб кетади, ва кўп ҳолларда фильм воқеаларидан узилиб қолади. Чунки Французча хабарнома - режиссёрнинг шахсий услубини имконсизлик чегараларигача экстримал кўринишда рў…
👍2❤1
Ўргимчак-одам: Уйга йўл йўқ Aхлоқ - ўргимчак-одам шахсиятининг ажралмас қисми ҳисобланади. Вазият қандай бўлишидан қатъий назар, у доимо эзгулик тамойилларига содиқ қолади ёки уларнинг аҳамиятини тушуниб етади. Марвел кино оламида эса ўргимчак-одамнинг ушбу потенциали деярли очиб берилмасдан, олдинги фильмларда шунчаки "пул олиб келувчи машина"нинг шогирдига айланиб, эътибор марказидан четда қолар эди. "Уйга йўл…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UzIMDb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 696,766 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@UzIMDb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Киномания” (@UzIMDb), 458 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UzIMDb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.