Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Палсапа

@Palsapa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

475subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357231964
TypeChannel
Username@Palsapa
Created15 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Palsapa

Growth

475476475.56 August 2026 — 476 subscribers6 August 2026 — 476 subscribers12 August 2026 — 475 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 475–476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:19475-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:01476no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:48476first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 February 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4041.7%
😢1818.8%
1616.7%
🔥1616.7%
🤡33.13%
🤔22.08%
🤣11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2021 to 16 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Palsapa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 February 2021 to 16 September 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2024, 17:38 UTC≈3,060 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Людвиг Витгенштейн https://telegra.ph/Lyudvig-Vitgenshtejn-1889-1951-Birinchi-%D2%9Bism-09-16-2

12🤔2

Signed Кудратов

11 Nov 2023, 18:01 UTC≈4,360 views17 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026

Нафас оляпти. Сокин. қўп нарса ўзгаргандек. Лекин ҳеч нарса ўзгармаган

👍16🤣1

Signed Улуғбек Р

21 Feb 2022, 15:37 UTC≈8,940 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ҳалиям ўтирибсиларми? Бўлди кетаверинглар. Ёзадиган нарса йўқ уже.

😢18🤡3👍1

Signed Раҳимжон Қудратов

28 Aug 2021, 12:53 UTC≈13,500 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Қанчадир олдин Жамшид ака сохта тренингчиларга қарши аёвсиз кураш бошлагандилар. Бугун қарасам, кўпчилик жангга кўнгилли бўлиб ёзилибди. Сохта тренинглар, вебинарчилар ва уларнинг одамларни қай тарзда авраши-ю, қай тарзда сувдан қуруқ чиқиши ҳақида барчаси қадамба-қадам тушунтириб берилган бир видео таржима қилгандим. Ўша чиқибди. Қуйида видеога ҳавола қолдираман: http://youtu.be/aqoPIxDFrXo @palsapa

👍6

Signed Раҳимжон Қудратов

26 Aug 2021, 07:05 UTC≈9,830 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Таълимнинг қайси шакли фойдали? Артур Шопенҳауэр бунга жавоб беради. Мақола узунлиги сабаб парчалари берилади. Инсонга хос интеллект муайян тадқиқотлар (ўқиб-ўрганиш) натижасида шаклланадиган умумий ғояларни ўз ичига олади. Шундай экан, интеллект - бу ўрганиш жараёнидан сўнг шаклланади, дейишади. Агар бу тўғри бўлса, яъни киши ўрганадиган нарсаларида ҳеч қандай китоб ёки ўқитувчига эмас, балки бутунлигича тажрибага

👍4🔥2

Signed Улуғбек Р

18 Aug 2021, 15:08 UTC≈8,280 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"Мени тушун" номли иккинчи китобдан парча. Биз Яҳудий-Христиан анъаналарининг мақсадларига (Яратганни ва инсониятни севиш) эргашишимизга даъво қиламиз. Ҳаттоки бизга диний ренессанс босқичидан ўтаётганимиз ҳақида айтишади. Бу гаплар ҳақиқатдан шунчалик йироқдаки, ҳатто ҳеч нарса ҳақиқатдан бунчалик йироқда бўла олмайди. Биз ҳақиқатдан ҳам диний анъанага хос бўлган рамзларни ишлатамиз, аммо уларни бегоналашган инсонн

👍4🔥1

Signed Улуғбек Р

30 Jun 2021, 16:21 UTC≈6,790 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#notsurewhereIam Реал воқелик ҳақида энг кўп гапни туш айтади. Холмирза бир ухлаганда фақат битта туш кўрмас, кўрадиган сериалларига ўхшаб, тушлари ҳам қисм-қисм давом этарди. Тунов куни тушида реалда ҳеч ҳис қилмаган нарсаси - экзистенциаль инқирозни ҳис қилди. Севгилиси қаердасиз, деб сўради. Жавобини биларди, шу шу галлактика, шу шу сайёра, шу шу давлат, шу шу шаҳардаман. Лекин умуман олганда шуни ўзи қаер? Қаерда

Signed Раҳимжон Қудратов

10 Jun 2021, 07:45 UTC≈5,430 viewsread 6 August 2026
File

Таржимон: Ҳикмат Толибжонов Матн ҳолида ўқиш : https://telegra.ph/Tuxum-04-30

Signed Ш

28 May 2021, 19:32 UTC≈5,640 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Инглиз тилида тўғридан-тўғри таржима қилинса, «қорнимда капалак бор» мазмунини ифодалайдиган ибора мавжуд. Бу ибора айнан нима маъно ифодалашини билмайман ёки унутганман. Тахминан, қандайдир ғалати ҳиссётни ҳис этишни ифодалайди. Ноқулайлик, қандайдир. Интернетдан сўзнинг аниқ мазмунини излагим йўқ, чунки аниқ маъно кўрсам, ўша маънога ҳиссиётимни бўйсундираман (ergo, ҳиссиёт чекланади). Мен эса ҳиссиётимга маъно бағ

👍4

Signed Раҳимжон Қудратов

27 May 2021, 15:17 UTC≈8,680 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Севгилингиз севасиз, негалигини билмайсизми? Бу сизга ғалати туюляптими? Ҳаддан ошиқ севиш касалликми ё ҳақиқий севги? Демократия ва инсон ҳуқуқлари қанча тиқиштирилмасин, одамлар нега пошшога сиғинамиз, деб турволишади, деб ўйлаганмисиз? Дунёни ўзгартирувчи ғояларни яратган одамларнинг мотивлари нималар бўлган? Отасидан ҳар куни калтак еган бола кун келиб ҳаммани ана шу босим остида ушлаб туришни кўзлайдиган ёки

Signed Раҳимжон Қудратов

30 Apr 2021, 15:01 UTC≈5,070 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

...Йигирманчи асрда эса инсон характери йўналиши пассивлик (сусткашлик) ҳамда бозор қадриятларига мослашишга томон ўзгарди. Замонамиз кишиси ўз бўш вақтининг катта қисмида нофаол. У умрбоқий истеъмолчи; у ичкилик, овқат, тамаки, лекциялар, томошалар, китоблар ва киноларни «қабул қилади»; буларнинг барчаси истеъмол қилинади, ичга ютилади. Бутун дунё унинг иштаҳаси учун объектга айланган: катта бутилка, катта олма, йир

👍1

Signed Раҳимжон Қудратов

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Palsapa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Палсапа” (@Palsapa), 475 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Palsapa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.