Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +484. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,212–24,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:41
24,769
+22
15 Sept 2026, 21:38
24,747
+27
14 Sept 2026, 06:21
24,720
+10
12 Sept 2026, 16:14
24,710
+22
10 Sept 2026, 15:37
24,688
+54
7 Sept 2026, 11:37
24,634
+22
4 Sept 2026, 15:41
24,612
+20
3 Sept 2026, 01:03
24,592
+23
1 Sept 2026, 20:49
24,569
+18
31 Aug 2026, 21:46
24,551
+26
30 Aug 2026, 20:05
24,525
+27
29 Aug 2026, 16:43
24,498
+22
28 Aug 2026, 16:53
24,476
+10
27 Aug 2026, 20:09
24,466
+10
26 Aug 2026, 21:12
24,456
+21
26 Aug 2026, 00:18
24,435
+10
24 Aug 2026, 20:43
24,425
+10
23 Aug 2026, 08:25
24,415
+1
21 Aug 2026, 21:27
24,414
+11
19 Aug 2026, 16:53
24,403
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 37m
Average length
14m 18s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,440 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
600
41.7%
👍
516
35.8%
💋
73
5.07%
🔥
62
4.31%
🍓
39
2.71%
👎
32
2.22%
❤🔥
24
1.67%
👏
19
1.32%
💯
14
0.972%
👌
10
0.694%
🤝
9
0.625%
🐳
8
0.556%
👻
8
0.556%
🥰
8
0.556%
🤪
5
0.347%
🤯
5
0.347%
🏆
4
0.278%
🙏
3
0.208%
🤩
1
0.069%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,440 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2022 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 THE ULTIMATE USMLE STEP 1 INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOW LIVE 🚀
To our global community of future physicians: The wait is over.
Do you know why most students burn out during Step 1?
It isn't a lack of effort—it's organizational chaos.
The average student wastes over 100 hours just trying to manually sync their progress across UWorld, First Aid, Anki, and video lectures. That is time and mental energy you desperately need f…
🚀 How to turn every UWorld block into a score-boosting, NBME-crushing machine
Here’s the truth no one tells you:
Most students think they’re reviewing UWorld… but they’re really just reading.
They finish 40 questions, glance at explanations, and tell themselves: “Okay, I get it.”
But their score doesn’t move.
Their weak areas don’t get stronger.
NBMEs still feel foreign.
Why?
Because skimming is not review.
If UWo…
🚨 Why 90% of students are misusing UWorld — and how it’s silently killing their prep
(Yes, even the ones doing “2 blocks a day”)
Let’s be real for a second.
Almost every USMLE student is using UWorld.
But here’s the twist: most are not learning from it — they’re just finishing it.
Sounds familiar?
• You do a timed block
• Feel good about hitting 65-75%
• Skim the explanations
• Tell yourself: “Okay, next block.”
…
🧠 10 Mistakes That Can Destroy Your USMLE Prep (Step 1, Step 2, or Step 3)
Hey future doctors! 🚨 Whether you’re prepping for Step 1 (pass/fail), Step 2 CK, or Step 3, these 10 mistakes are the reason many students underperform — or fail completely.
📉 Here are the top traps that thousands of students on Reddit and USMLE forums regret falling into:
1️⃣ Memorizing Anki without meaning
👉 Don’t just memorize. Always as…
UWorld Q BANK 2023 AS DRIVE FOLDER🔥
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1DNrKQbEz_ABCJwrL8rdtfJWg7mGyqI3X
UWorld Q BANK 2023 PDF files🔥
https://t.me/UW_offline
First Aid 2023
https://t.me/Usmle_FA_UW
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Usmle_FA_UW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
📷أحلا الصور🎀 @vbtuji · 33,798 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
💗همسات الروح🍃🌻 @msgti · 37,736 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“First Aid book & videos 2026” (@Usmle_FA_UW), 24,769 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Usmle_FA_UW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.