럼프형 요즘 왜 이러지...

Channel
알쓸신잡
@UselessKn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,601subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001183237907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UselessKn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UselessKn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 1,601 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 1,604 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 1,604 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 39.7%
- avg views ÷ 1,601 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 635
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.302%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (2 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,067 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
국장&코인러 현재 상황
업비트는 봉크 거래 지원 종료, 빗썸은 유의종목 해제를 공지함. DAXA 내에서 이렇게 처분이 다른 건 처음 보는 것 같은데..
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다
이러고 오늘 로빈훗 스팟 상장함. 예전에 업비트가 비트렉스랑 오더북 공유할 때 이런거 많았는데..
로빈후드의 캐시캣은 의문의 신규지갑들이 뜬금없이 수억원~십억원치를 매집하기 시작해서 이게 혹시 상장내부 찌라시아니냐~~~ 는 카더라뉴스로 73M 까지 슈퍼반등했네요. 전반적으로, 로빈후드 덱스 볼륨자체가 다소 우하향중이긴해서 지겨운 런치패드 전쟁말고 새로운 내외부적인 모멘텀이 필요하다고는 생각합니다 *당연히 검증된 정보아님 (걍 찌라시니까 걸러들으시길)
U.S. REMOVES IRAN-RELATED SANCTIONS -TREASURY WEBSITE (@WalterBloomberg)
전설의 양주(라지만 알콜이 안들어갔던)가 부활합니다. 근데 캡틴큐가 아니라 캪틴큐였네요 ㄷㄷㄷ
🚨 2027년부터 코인 수익에 세금 22% ① 매매·대여 수익 과세 - 2027년 1월 1일 이후 발생한 가상자산 수익부터 적용 - 연간 순이익에서 250만원 공제 - 초과분에 22% 과세 (소득세 20%+지방소득세 2%) - 첫 신고는 2028년 5월 ② 코인끼리 교환해도 과세 - BTC→ETH, USDT→알트코인 같은 교환도 매도로 간주 - 원화로 출금하지 않아도 교환 시점의 원화가치로 수익 계산 ③ 기존 보유자는 2026년 말 가격이 중요 - 2027년 이전부터 보유한 코인의 취득가격은 실제 매수가와 2026년 12월 31일 시가 중 높은 금액 적용 - 따라서 2026년 말까지 오른 가격은 상당 부분 과세 대상에서 제외되는 구조 예시: 2027년 순이익 1,000만원이면 1,000만원-250만원에 22% 적용 → 세금 16…
네이버 주주 오열짤
Strategy, 비트코인 최대 50억 달러 매각 가능성 Strategy가 현금성 자금 확보와 배당·자사주 매입 등을 위해 최대 약 50억 달러 규모의 비트코인을 매각할 수 있는 자본관리 계획을 공개함. • 달러 준비금 최대 12.5억 달러 확보 • 연간 우선주 배당 및 이자 약 17.6억 달러 충당 • 보통주·디지털 신용증권 자사주 매입에 최대 20억 달러 활용 • 올해 이미 우선주 배당 재원으로 약 2.18억 달러 상당 BTC 매각 • 7월 26일 기준 843,775 BTC 보유 • 평균 매입단가는 75,476달러
국장을 살리는 건 역시 인구신
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @UselessKn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“알쓸신잡” (@UselessKn), 1,601 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UselessKn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.