4 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC51 viewsread 8 August 2026
چشم مبداء بینایی نیست، ما با یک باقیمانده سروکار داریم! #روانکاو #روانکاوی #لکان #ابژه #نگاه https://nadiasabouri.com/flesh-of-the-world-and-the-structure-of-the-gaze-in-lacan/
Channel
Unconscious Subject
@Unconscious_Subject
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
240subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001358433391 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Unconscious_Subject |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Unconscious_Subject |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 240 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 236 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 236 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 235 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 45.8%
- avg views ÷ 240 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 110
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 879 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 43s
- Average length
- 3m 43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
1 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC90 viewsread 8 August 2026
یهودیت برای سرزمین میجنگد، اسلام برای خدا! نتانیاهو روز گذشته در مصاحبهای با فاکس نیوز گفته است: «ما نوادگان یهودیان اصیل سرزمین مقدس هستیم، بخش اولی از میراث یهودیت و مسیحیت که آن را گرامی میداریم و به جهان، تمدنی مبتنی بر آزادی و ایمان بخشیدهایم. بار دیگر، ما باید ایستاده و از آن دفاع کنیم. این میراث در معرض حملات ناشی از افزایش موجهای یهودستیزی و مخالفت با مسیحیت انجیلی قرار دارد.» اما آیا دوران جنگهای صلی…
30 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026
اگر به مقولاتی که در آغاز مطرح کردم بازگردیم، رخداد لکانی به معنای تروما، یعنی آنچه برای هر فرد ردپایی بر جای میگذارد، همان نبود رابطه جنسی است. لکان تصریح میکند که این ردپا نه برای سوژه، بلکه برای موجود سخنگو بر جای میماند. این ردپاها بر بدن نقش میبندند و به صورت نشانهها و عواطف ظاهر میشوند. همین امر به لکان امکان میدهد که دیدار عشق را دیدار با تمام آن چیزی تعریف کند که بر بدن، ردپای تبعید او از رابطه جنسی را…
30 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC92 viewsread 8 August 2026
[…] این بدان معناست که نه اغواگری، نه تهدید به اختگی، نه از دست دادن عشق، نه مشاهده رابطه جنسی والدین و نه ادیپ، هیچیک اصل رخداد بنیادینی نیستند که ردپای عاطفه را ترسیم میکند؛ بلکه آنچه این جایگاه را اشغال میکند، رابطه با زبان است. لکان این نکته را، شاید به شکلی بیش از حد منطقی، در این فرمول خلاصه میکند که «دال علت ژوئیسانس است»، اما این فرمول در مفهوم رخداد بنیادین بدن جای میگیرد؛ رخدادی که همان تاثیر زبان بر ب…
19 Jul 2026, 04:59 UTC178 viewsread 8 August 2026
از نظر او [لکان]، آنچه اهمیت دارد «زندگی» به معنای زیستشناختی نیست بلکه ژوئیسانس است که زندگی ایجاد میکند. هر مادهای ژوئیسانس نمیبرد. ژوئیسانس فقط آنجا پدیدار میشود که بدنی وجود داشته باشد که زبان بر آن اثر گذاشته باشد. ما با بدنی سروکار داریم که دال بر آن فرود آمده است! #رخداد_بدن #میلر https://youtu.be/s3Fg-KUpUdw?si=3WlAXgFbypso26Pc
18 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kavoshmediaVideo
✅ نظریهپرداز و استاد دانشگاه ملی مکزیک: 📍ترامپ از تاریخ سر در نمیآورد اگر از تاریخ چیزی میدانست میفهمید که باید تسلیم محض ایران را از سر بیرون کند... 🔻دنیا فقط نکات منفی ایران را به ما نشان میدهد، به ما نمیگویند آنها یک تمدن هستند که بهترین مهندسان و دانشمندان را دارند و در حوزه آموزش جزو بهترینها هستند... #اسپانیایی 🆔 @Kavoshmedia
17 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026
انسان بدن ندارد! #بدن #ژوییسانس #لکان #روانکاوی #میلر #روانکاو https://nadiasabouri.com/human-does-not-have-a-body/
17 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026
Roy Batty: “I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe…” ”…All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.” https://youtu.be/HU7Ga7qTLDU?si=reaYM28vV0fsygls
12 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC185 viewsread 8 August 2026
کنش لکانی در جهان معاصر؛ روانکاوی از چه چیزی دفاع میکند؟ ما حتی نمیتوانیم به سادگی بگوییم یک جلسه تحلیل «به چه درد میخورد». #فروید #لکان #روانکاوی #میلر #روانکاو https://nadiasabouri.com/lacanian-action-in-the-contemporary-world-what-does-psychoanalysis-defend/
10 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC194 viewsread 8 August 2026
آیا روانکاوی بدون دیگری ممکن است؟ #روانکاوی #روانکاو #فروید #لکان https://nadiasabouri.com/can-psychoanalysis-exist-without-the-other/
2 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC183 viewsread 8 August 2026
دیدرو بهتدریج میکوشد نشان دهد که از خلال تغذیه، ماده معدنی در رشد گیاه نقش دارد و گیاهی که یک گیاهخوار میخورد نیز در بدن موجود زنده حضور مییابد. بنابراین، او به این وحدت شگفتانگیز حساسیت میرسد؛ حساسیتی که بنیان همه فلسفههای طبیعت است. او ناچار میشود میان دو حالت حساسیت تمایز بگذارد: حساسیت نهفته و حساسیت فعال اما حساسیت نهفته نیز نمیتواند چیزی جز حساسیت در حال انتظار باشد. این همان کشفیات شگفتانگیز شلینگ …
2 Jul 2026, 19:26 UTC134 viewsread 8 August 2026
دالامبر با تعجب میپرسد: «میخواهی بگویی سنگ احساس دارد؟» و دیدرو پاسخ میدهد: «چرا که نه؟» برای دیدرو، حساس بودن ویژگی هر مادهای است. اما لکان چنین ایدهای را نمیپذیرد. از نظر او، آنچه اهمیت دارد «زندگی» به معنای زیستشناختی نیست بلکه ژوئیسانس است که زندگی ایجاد میکند. هر مادهای ژوئیسانس نمیبرد. ژوئیسانس فقط آنجا پدیدار میشود که بدنی وجود داشته باشد که زبان بر آن اثر گذاشته باشد. ما با بدنی سروکار داریم که …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Unconscious_Subject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 810,506 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Unconscious Subject” (@Unconscious_Subject), 240 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Unconscious_Subject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.