Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 38 of the 38 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 753 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 100 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,911–20,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Nov 2026, 07:55
19,961
-38
10 Nov 2026, 14:56
19,999
-9
8 Nov 2026, 22:39
20,008
-8
7 Nov 2026, 13:57
20,016
+3
6 Nov 2026, 12:25
20,013
+1
5 Nov 2026, 10:56
20,012
-13
3 Nov 2026, 11:55
20,025
-11
2 Nov 2026, 08:41
20,036
-1
1 Nov 2026, 12:06
20,037
-7
31 Oct 2026, 13:58
20,044
-7
30 Oct 2026, 10:39
20,051
-3
29 Oct 2026, 09:45
20,054
+20
28 Oct 2026, 05:38
20,034
-8
27 Oct 2026, 04:57
20,042
+16
26 Oct 2026, 01:56
20,026
-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:26
20,032
+16
23 Oct 2026, 00:01
20,016
-3
22 Oct 2026, 01:17
20,019
-4
20 Oct 2026, 22:27
20,023
+2
19 Oct 2026, 17:30
20,021
first reading
Engagement
1,182 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.86%
avg views ÷ 19,961 subscribers
Avg views / post
572
431 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
433
of 1,182 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 397 of 431 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
1,182 (7 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
246,468
Reactions total
24,920
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 04:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
27,346 reactions across 848 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,832
21.3%
👍
4,381
16.0%
👏
4,319
15.8%
🔥
4,319
15.8%
💯
4,170
15.2%
🎉
4,136
15.1%
🥰
53
0.194%
🙏
23
0.084%
😱
20
0.073%
🤩
20
0.073%
🏆
14
0.051%
😍
13
0.048%
🕊
8
0.029%
🫡
8
0.029%
😢
6
0.022%
🆒
5
0.018%
✍
4
0.015%
👌
4
0.015%
❤🔥
3
0.011%
💔
3
0.011%
3 further kinds
5
0.018%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 859 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 996 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @USDGoldusd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 433 posts held from the last 30 days (1.39%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴⭕️ قالت سوزان كولينز، رئيسة بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي في بوسطن، إنها تفضّل رفع أسعار الفائدة تدريجياً، لمنح الاقتصاد الأميركي وقتاً للتكيف مع حالة عدم اليقين.
📌 وأكدت أن ضغوط التضخم لا تزال مرتفعة، مشيرةً إلى أن البيانات الاقتصادية الأخيرة دفعتها لتوقع وصول أسعار الفائدة خلال العام المقبل إلى مستويات أعلى مما كانت تتوقعه سابقاً.
📌 وشددت على أن مواصلة التشديد النقدي ضرورية، لكنها لا تؤيد بالضرورة تسريع وتيرة رفع الفا…
🔴🇺🇸 أعلنت القيادة المركزية الأميركية أن مقاتلات F-16 تنفذ دوريات فوق المياه الإقليمية في الشرق الأوسط.
🛢🛳 وأشارت إلى عبور أكثر من 1.7 مليار برميل من النفط الخام عبر مضيق هرمز.
https://t.me/USDGoldusd
🌙🟡📰 موجز المساء
✈️ إلغاء أكثر من 9,100 رحلة أمريكية الجمعة و3,800 السبت، بعد توقف شامل للطيران لنحو 5 ساعات بسبب عطل في الاتصالات.
⬅️ وزير النقل شون دافي: العطل وقع أثناء نقل خطوط الاتصال من النحاس إلى الألياف لدى شركة L3Harris المتعاقدة، ولا مؤشر على هجوم إلكتروني.
🛠️ دافي: استبدلنا 69% من المعدات القديمة وبعضها عمره 30 عاماً، ونطلب من الكونغرس 50 مليار دولار للتحديث، مع اعتذار رسمي للمسافرين.
🏦 رئيسة فيدرالي ب…
🚨 الخطر الذي يغفله الكثيرون
تخيل أن لديك حساب تداول بقيمة 1,000 دولار، وقررت ألا تخاطر بأكثر من 2% في الصفقة الواحدة.
فتحت 3 صفقات:
🔘 شراء الذهب: مخاطرة 20 دولارًا.
🔘 شراء اليورو مقابل الدولار: مخاطرة 20 دولارًا.
🔘 شراء الجنيه الإسترليني مقابل الدولار: مخاطرة 20 دولارًا.
كل صفقة تبدو آمنة وحدها.. فأين المشكلة؟
⚠️ إذا ارتفع الدولار بقوة، فقد تهبط الأصول الثلاثة معًا، وتخسر الصفقات كلها في الوقت نفسه
📉 النتيجة؟…
🔴 داخل عقل المتداول | لماذا تدخل الصفقة في أسوأ توقيت؟
تخيل أن الذهب ارتفع 30 دولارًا خلال دقائق، وأنت تراقب الحركة دون أن تدخل.
وفجأة تبدأ تفكر: "لو انتظرت أكثر، هتضيع مني فرصة ربح كبيرة"
فتقرر الشراء بسرعة، لكن بعد دخولك مباشرة يبدأ الذهب في الهبوط
😓 لماذا يتكرر هذا الموقف؟
لأنك وقعت في فخ يُسمى الخوف من ضياع الفرصة (FOMO).
ببساطة، عندما ترى السعر يتحرك بقوة، تشعر أن الجميع يربحون إلا أنت، فتدخل دون التأكد من…
🌍 أخبار العالم
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🪙 📉 "Bitcoin" (بيتكوين)
هبطت عملة بيتكوين إلى ما دون 66,000 دولار، مع تصفية 205 ملايين دولار من سوق العملات المشفرة خلال الـ60 دقيقة الماضية.
🎯 التحليل: موجة تصفية حادة تضغط على السوق وتشير إلى استمرار ضعف المعنويات في العملات المشفرة.
────────────────────
🏦 📰 "Susan Collins" (Federal Reserve)
قالت سوزان كولينز من الاحتياطي الفيدرالي إن هناك حجة قوية للإبقاء على الفائدة دون تغي…
🇺🇸 أفادت مصادر مطلعة لرويترز بأن دونالد ترامب أبلغ مستشاريه بإمكانية تجنب شن هجمات جديدة على إيران، ما لم تقدم طهران أو الحوثيون على استفزازات جديدة.
📌 ويأتي ذلك وسط ضغوط إقليمية لاحتواء التصعيد، ومخاوف من تداعيات الحرب على أسعار الوقود والناخبين الأميركيين.
⚠️ ورغم احتمال وقف الضربات، تواصل واشنطن الضغط الاقتصادي والعسكري على إيران، مع إبقاء الخيار العسكري مطروحاً.
https://t.me/USDGoldusd
🛢 كيف يمكن لارتفاع النفط أن يرفع سعر الطعام.. ويؤثر على الذهب؟
تخيل أن سعر النفط ارتفع بقوة، رغم أنك لا تمتلك سيارة ولا تشتري البنزين
المفاجأة أنك قد تدفع ثمن هذا الارتفاع أيضًا
💡 كيف يحدث ذلك؟
🔘 يرتفع النفط، فتزداد تكلفة الوقود على شركات النقل.
🔘 ترتفع تكلفة نقل الطعام والمنتجات إلى المتاجر.
🔘 قد ترفع الشركات أسعار منتجاتها لتعويض التكاليف.
وهكذا تبدأ الأسعار في الارتفاع، وهو ما نسميه التضخم.
🏦 لكن ما علاقة …
🚨 وزير الخزانة الأمريكي يحذر من رفع الفائدة.. فهل يستفيد الذهب؟
في تصريحات مهمة اليوم، طالب وزير الخزانة الأمريكي سكوت بيسنت الاحتياطي الفيدرالي بعدم التسرع في رفع أسعار الفائدة بسبب ارتفاع أسعار الطاقة.
🏦 لكن لماذا يعارض رفع الفائدة؟
يرى بيسنت أن التضخم الحالي مرتبط جزئيًا بارتفاع أسعار النفط نتيجة اضطراب الإمدادات، وليس بسبب ضعف الاقتصاد الأمريكي.
💡 بمعنى أبسط:
إذا ارتفع سعر النفط بسبب نقص الكميات المتاحة، فإن ر…
اتنين من أكبر البنوك مختلفين حول مستقبل الذهب... مين فيهم هيكون صح؟ 🤔
رغم التراجع القوي اللي شهده الذهب مؤخرًا، لسه المؤسسات المالية الكبيرة مختلفة بشكل واضح حول اتجاهه الفترة الجاية.
فيه اختلاف في توقعات بنكين من أكبر المؤسسات المالية في العالم، توقع بيقول إن الذهب ممكن يواجه ضغوط إضافية، وتوقع تاني شايف إن الأسعار الحالية مجرد مرحلة تصحيح قبل استكمال الصعود.
السيناريو الأول خاص بجولدمان ساكس وشايف إن الذهب ممكن …
⭕️ | سوسيتيه جنرال: الذهب يستعد لمشتريات بـ 3.3 مليار دولار بداية 2027
✔ في حاجة اسمها إعادة توزيع الاوزان في مؤشرات السلع العالمية بتحصل كل سنة، والمقصود بيها ان المؤشر بيغير حصة كل سلعة موجودة فيه على حسب أداء السلعة خلال السنة اللي انتهت
✔ بنك سوسيتيه جنرال بيتوقع ان الذهب هيحقق استفادة كبيرة بسبب إعادة توزيع الاوزان في المؤشرات، وان المؤشرات هتشتري عقود آجلة للذهب بمقدار 3.3 مليار دولار علشان ترفع حصته في المؤش…
أخبار الذهب والدولار pinned «🚨ملخص صفقات الاسبوع الماضي 📊 🥇 صفقة شراء 480 pip 🥇صفقة شراء 150 pip 🥇صفقة شراء 50 -pip ستوب 🥇صفقة شراء 150 pip 🥇 صفقة شراء 100 pip 🥇صفقة بيع 50- pip ستوب 🥇صفقة بيع 50 pip 🥇صفقة شراء 50 pip 🥇صفقة شراء 50 pip 🥇صفقة بيع 310 pip 🥇 صفقة شراء 50- pip…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,182 posts we hold for @USDGoldusd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أخبار الفوركس @ForexNews24hours · 256,815 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
السوق اليوم @SouqToday · 86,588 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
القران الكريم ، اذكار ، ادعية ، ايات @DleelD · 19,712 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 28 September 2026
الصرف اليوم - الجنيه المصري @SarfToday · 64,104 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
اسعار الذهب لحظيا بمصر 🇪🇬 @goldprice10000 · 295,964 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Abu Ghazal Trader In Forex @goldprice3 · 86,855 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
بوابة المتداولين Traders Gateway @GoldToday1111 · 24,881 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
اسعار الذهب الآن - Gold Price Now @goldpricenowlive · 77,631 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
سعر الذهب اليوم في مصر 🇪🇬 @goldprice10 · 19,754 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 September 2026
Hi @mGoldMm · 12 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
اخبار الفوركس Forex News @fforexNews · 28,815 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
نشرة اخبار الفوركس 📰 @ForexNewspaper · 123,920 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
Gold price @goldratepric2020 · 28,134 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
اسعار الذهب و الفضة و الدولار 🇪🇬 @goldprices100 · 60,011 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
The Elite🇪🇬توقعات سعر الذهب @theEliteEG · 39,077 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
اسعار الذهب لحظه بلحظه @GoldToday0 · 96,918 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 15 August 2026
اخبار الفوركس والاقتصاد📊 @fx_news_34 · 71,721 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
BTC - مركز تجارة الذهب الخام @bulliontradingcentet · 19,335 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 October 2026
أسعار الذهب لحظه بلحظه 🇪🇬 @goldprices10 · 508,285 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
الذهب والعملات - اقتصادى @Goldfekr · 165,344 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
قناة Gold Era لتجارة الذهب @GoldEraTrading · 42,728 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
exness.arabic @exnessAR · 19,721 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
أسعار الفضة الأن بمصر 🇪🇬 @silver_as3ar · 34,184 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
قناه لتحليل الذهب @fady66 · 19,041 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أخبار الذهب والدولار” (@USDGoldusd), 19,961 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USDGoldusd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.