تحذير ❗️ التداول في الاسواق العالمية خطر ويحتاج الى خبرة عدم الخبرة ربما يؤدي لخسارة كبيرة!
👈 تحليلات احترافية
👈 كورسات تعليمية بالمجان من الصفر
👈 الدعم الفني maxifyfx.com
يوتيوب : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC42DNR4KDslAS6EkfspCxAg
UAE,Dubai
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,632–36,706 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 12:31
36,380
-3
8 Nov 2026, 05:22
36,383
-12
6 Nov 2026, 22:15
36,395
-8
5 Nov 2026, 19:59
36,403
-14
4 Nov 2026, 17:29
36,417
-14
3 Nov 2026, 17:35
36,431
-6
2 Nov 2026, 20:57
36,437
-6
1 Nov 2026, 23:21
36,443
+3
31 Oct 2026, 21:40
36,440
-3
30 Oct 2026, 20:28
36,443
+56
29 Oct 2026, 20:37
36,387
-23
28 Oct 2026, 20:47
36,410
-10
27 Oct 2026, 20:40
36,420
-17
26 Oct 2026, 18:58
36,437
-2
25 Oct 2026, 17:10
36,439
-7
24 Oct 2026, 18:46
36,446
-17
23 Oct 2026, 20:36
36,463
-13
22 Oct 2026, 18:06
36,476
-18
21 Oct 2026, 10:07
36,494
-20
20 Oct 2026, 07:59
36,514
first reading
Engagement
109 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 36,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,270
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 109 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
109 (23 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
76,850
Reactions total
1,038
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,360
Videos
≈100
Links
≈628
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,941 reactions across 97 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,189
60.4%
🔥
701
10.1%
❤🔥
498
7.17%
👍
287
4.13%
👏
266
3.83%
💯
188
2.71%
🤯
146
2.10%
👌
114
1.64%
🐳
77
1.11%
😱
59
0.85%
🥰
56
0.807%
🏆
53
0.764%
🆒
51
0.735%
🙏
51
0.735%
😢
39
0.562%
🤔
33
0.475%
🤩
33
0.475%
⚡
32
0.461%
💋
21
0.303%
🕊
17
0.245%
6 further kinds
30
0.432%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,941 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (27.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
هبوط حاد جداً بسوق الاسهم الامريكية… ماهو السبب؟
فوز الديمقراطيين بالسيطرة على الكونغرس أثار مخاوف من تشريعات أكثر تشدداً على الذكاء الاصطناعي، مع تصاعد المعارضة المحلية لإنشاء مراكز بيانات جديدة، خصوصاً بسبب استهلاك الكهرباء الي تنعكس على المواطن الامريكي
بالتالي المستثمرون بدأوا يعيدون تقييم المبالغ الضخمة المستثمرة في شركات الذكاء الاصطناعي، خصوصاً الشركات المنتجة للرقائق والمعدات المخصصة لمراكز البيانات.
إذا تب…
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
هذا السيناريو ما محصن ضده اي شركة واي شخص بالعالم!!
ولهذا لو تتذكرون قبل قرابة 3 سنوات نشرت منشور وضحت بي كيف Maxify تتعامل مع الاموال (وكيف انا شخصياً اتعامل معاها!)
راس المال اليومي الي تتعامل بي الشركة بسيط يسد احتياجات السحوبات اليومية ويتجدد بشكل يومي فقط
والاموال فـ نسبة كبيرة منها موزعة على مزودين السيولة بالمارجن اكاونت ومقفوله
وبما يعادل إيداعات العملاء الكلية تقريباً او الحد الادنى 80% من قيمة ايداعات ا…
تعرفون شنو المصيبة الكبرى؟؟
احتياطيات الطوارئ عند بينانس صندوق SAFU لحماية المستخدمين
حجمه تقريباً مليار دولار فقط بـ يناير 2026
الخسائر المؤكدة للان 3.5 مليار (لان جزء من ال5.7 تم تجميده! )
تبقى اموال عملاء مسروقة قرابة 2.5 مليار دولار!!
هل سنشاهد انهيار اكبر واهم بورصة عملات رقمية بالتاريخ ؟
الي يحب يدخل يتصفح العمليات الي انسرقت مباشر (التحويلات على البلوكتيشن)
تفضل https://etherscan.io/address/0x5227f603C1eE34CE3C06eFe6477003BDfCCB2f8c
+20
ليس للقلوب الضعيفه….
الـAi ومايفعل يا اخوان… سبق وان تكلمت بالامر باكثر من مناسبة
احنا بزمن الثلاجة الي عندك بالبيت لو بيها اي سستم ذكي معرضة للاختراق
العالم اليوم غير محصن، واقوى مودلات الذكاء الاصطناعي بالعالم موجودة مفتوحة المصدر ‼️
Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @tradaying. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tradaying edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 September 2026
Most recent edit
9 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @tradaying as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
سامر جيرمني 1SMG1 @smgsamer · 97,022 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 August 2026
بوابة الربح من التداول @am500y · 21,199 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
4Candles 📊 @FourCandles4 · 49,014 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 September 2026
IQ TRADING 📊 @IQ_TG1 · 20,749 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026
نخبة محللين العراق || FX 🇮🇶 @SMARTMONYFX · 51,132 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
🥇SAFE PIPS | توصيات النقاط الامنة @safe_pip · 40,224 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
توصيات فوركس @fx5orx · 29,670 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
الميرزا - Mirza @Miirzaa3 · 104,637 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
اخبار الفوركس العاجلة 📊📚 @ForexBreakingNews · 369,486 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
WOLF TRADING @wolftrading25 · 34,877 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
نشرة اخبار الفوركس 📰 @ForexNewspaper · 125,585 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
توصيات Forex FOX @CRTFOX12 · 29,486 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
سعر الدولار اليوم @dollar_price · 48,764 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 27 August 2026
سعر الذهب @go_pri · 123,083 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
أخبار الفوركس @ForexNews24hours · 229,044 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
أخبار الذهب والدولار @USDGoldusd · 19,999 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 September 2026
اخبار العراق + سعر صرف الدولار 🇮🇶 @IR_N0 · 23,759 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 September 2026
BORKAN FOREX @BORKANFX · 27,628 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
GXD DIAMOND Academy 💎 @GXDIAMONDorg · 34,136 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 September 2026
Qamar Alali - Richmama🌗 @QamarAlali16 · 53,417 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Forex_ab @forex_ab99 · 33,348 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
Sniper Storm || USD 👁 @addddq · 33,014 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 2 September 2026
اخبار الفوركس والاقتصاد📊 @fx_news_34 · 71,904 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
شركة القصر للصرافة @Kukh_alomlat · 35,316 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 71 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“متداول يومي - Daily trading” (@tradaying), 36,380 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradaying.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.